Posted on 07/09/2012 9:45:57 AM PDT by jazusamo
"What has been the net effect? During this administration, the proportion of the working age population that has a job has fallen to the lowest level in decades."
That's what I was thinking as I listened to "Obama" spinning "jobs created" numbers in Ohio recently.
marker
Ideally/Theoretically, shouldn't that cost be negative?
>> The bottom line is that, while 5,000 jobs were saved in the American steel industry, 26,000 jobs were lost in American industries that produced products made of steel. On net balance, the country lost jobs by restricting the importation of steel.
True, but such job and economic loss is generally a consequence of manipulating competition regardless of how the results are achieved.
I’m not deeply in favor of imports, but neither do I care for the entitlement nature of big labor threatened by World competition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.