[HiTech RedNeck]

A real turd would fall apart if held out of water like that.

The history of incumbents being challenged suggests that if Obama wanted a comfortable win over Romney, he would need to be well ahead at this point. His ignorant mudballs are hilariously failing to garner him such a lead. If I were to be utterly Machiavellian, I would tell Obama to attack Romney as being too liberal.

[relictele]

I agree, but then I see ‘analysis’ (read: Obama’s free PR agency) pieces like this and shake my head in disbelief:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-07-15/bain-romney-obama-ads/56239904/1

[Kenny Bunk]

Amazing that it is ... reportedly ... at 50-50. Amazing that 50% of American Voters are interested enough in this jive-ass teleprompter jockey to actually consider voting for him ... again.

Somethin' ain't right with this story. Either that, or you can e-mail me in Tierra del Fuego after November. Come on. We're Americans. We couldn't be this stupid. Could we?

[Da Bilge Troll]

The history of incumbents being challenged suggests that if Obama wanted a comfortable win over Romney, he would need to be well ahead at this point.

Not only that but history shows that no incumbent president has ever won reelection by a smaller margin than their first election!