Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Port security: U.S. fails to meet deadline for scanning of cargo containers
WaPo ^ | July 15, 2012 | Douglas Frantz

Posted on 07/17/2012 6:47:50 AM PDT by upchuck

The Obama administration has failed to meet a legal deadline for scanning all shipping containers for radioactive material before they reach the United States, a requirement aimed at strengthening maritime security and preventing terrorists from smuggling a nuclear device into any of the nation’s 300 sea and river ports.

The Department of Homeland Security was given until this month to ensure that 100 percent of inbound shipping containers are screened at foreign ports.

But the department’s secretary, Janet Napolitano, informed Congress in May that she was extending a two-year blanket exemption to foreign ports because the screening is proving too costly and cumbersome. She said it would cost $16 billion to implement scanning measures at the nearly 700 ports worldwide that ship to the United States.

Instead, the DHS relies on intelligence-gathering and analysis to identify “high-risk” containers, which are checked before being loaded onto ships. Under this system, fewer than half a percent of the roughly 10 million containers arriving at U.S. ports last year were scanned before departure. The DHS says that those checks turned up narcotics and other contraband but that there have been no public reports of smuggled nuclear material.

In response to the 9/11 Commission, Congress passed a law in 2007 specifying that no cargo container may enter the United States before being scanned with imaging equipment and a radiation-detection device.

The administration’s failure to meet the deadline has left some members of Congress and outside experts concerned about whether the threat is being taken seriously enough.

“I personally do not believe they intend to comply with the law,” Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), co-author of the 2007 law, said in an interview. “This is a real terrorist threat, and it has a solution. We can’t afford to wait until a catastrophic attack.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cargocontainers; containers; dhs; edmarkey; janetnapolitano; markey; napolitano; ports; radioactivematerial; shippingcontainers; terrorism; usports
Markey has seen the movie, "The Sum of All Fears," Big Sis has not.

The law was passed in 2007. Five years later, DHS is still screwing around. I wonder by what authority Sis extended the exemption?

1 posted on 07/17/2012 6:47:56 AM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

They have no problem scanning me at an airport and being very invasive about it. So what gives here?


2 posted on 07/17/2012 7:42:12 AM PDT by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Combine this with his muzzie buddies camping out in the WH and closing border patrol offices and what have you got? Mmmmmm mmmmm.


3 posted on 07/17/2012 8:09:23 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

That much money for 700 units of something? What does she need, full radar units that are put into carriers, plus all the dishes?

In a just country, she’d be thrown into jail and forgotten about.


4 posted on 07/17/2012 11:07:16 AM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Brings to my memory the interview I watched some years ago, regarding the chief of port security at some CA port. The local TV station interviewed him about some _event_ at the port that day. He stated that this kind of _event_ has occurred many times in other USA ports. As he was describing this, the DHS agent standing off to the side began making hand motions to discontinue/limit this info. The chief appeared to notice but still spilled some of the beans. Seemed like a real USAian, worried for USA and gave us some of the facts.
5 posted on 07/17/2012 11:40:17 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veracious
they got plenty of funding to unnecessarily harrass every airline passenger but the idiots cant find the funding to check the most likely delivery system for a nuclear attack ?

our government is an Idiocracy

6 posted on 07/17/2012 3:01:27 PM PDT by KTM rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson