Posted on 07/21/2012 10:40:03 AM PDT by scottjewell
“Thousands of kids who might have otherwise worked through their pubescent sexual identity issues will be inspired to accept the wrong choice based upon this unscientific, emotionally charged born this way propaganda,” the FFA writes, “What’s brave or kind about telling thousands of sexually frustrated teens that they were born this way when a high percentage of them would have ended up taking the straight heterosexual path for life?”
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingwatch.org ...
I know you do not support her/them. I appreciate your candor, but I really do believe you (and others) may take for granted your robust heterosexual constitution, not realizing that there is a minority (but a significant one) who really do pass through a phase of confusion, and do not need it made worse. Thanks for reading and commenting. :-)
Do you mean the same money train that J.C. Penney got on?
Their stock fell 50% and their business went in the toilet after Degenerate signed on.
Offict Depot has seen me for the last time and I gave up Oreo’s and started eating at Chick Fil-et.
Thanks for these remarks and I think this is why Freud himself has now been put in a closet:
He emphasized just how important parenting and guidance from the culture really are.
People do not just spring up spontaneously as healthy men and women, able to marry and to raise families. They must be NURTURED and GUIDED to become so. We are far more complex than animals; hence, many things can and do go awry with us.
It is no accident that after households guided by single mothers became all the rage in the late ‘60s and early ‘70s, the number of gay bars began to spring up all over the nation. Young males had become confused and they were acting out. “Born that way” is another way of saying, “for god’s sake, do not blame divorce, single motherhood, destruction of fatherhood, religion or culture. No, just say they were born gay, so we are all off the hook. “
Not once in my life did I ever think of myself as other than a man , and not being handsome or particluarly a jock,never stopped me from looking at the attributes of the beautiful females, whether I had a shot at them or not.
Well, time will tell here. JCP is in trouble, but there may be other reasons for this. Other companies who have gone “pro-gay” are still doing well.
The FFA continue to run circles around the bloated, multi-million dollar national groups Focus on the Family and FRC. Love them.
Your welcome.
It is just common sense. Raising four healthy boys was hard in this sexualized culture which is getting worse by the minute. You need to pick a dedicated, emotionally healthy man to help raise your children if you are a woman. Choices matter for the mental health of children.
We have allowed the perverts to design the curricula in the schools to corrupt our children to the worldview of Afghanis.
We allowed the perverts to overthrow reason and truth by their corruption of the APA and silencing and demeaning of all Christian perspectives which formed the greatest—healthiest—freest cultures in the history of man.
We are allowing the Age of Reason to be destroyed by the irrational Postmodernism of Marx and the atheists who want to return us to the Sandusky culture of the Ancient Greeks. All homosexual literature adores the Ancient Greeks when women were breeders and boys were the prizes and slavery was good as was child sacrifice. It is such a sick worldview these atheists are forcing on children in the schools.
My pleasure. Thanks for your comments as well. Sometimes discussions like these lead to less than civil behavior.
whoops—You’re
I don’t think that homosexuality is 100% divorced from environment. Sexually abused children can certainly have serious mental issues throughout their lives. I just think there are people who grow up “normal, healthy” lives that are gay. I don’t think they choose it.
Why teaching children about sex is evil, is because of their natural sexual formation and the latency period. Even Rousseau recognized this universal formation of children—the need from non-sexual focus on others. It is necessary for boys and girls to identify with the same sex (6-12) at this age so that at puberty they have a strong natural identity of self-—so then they can mature into a focus on the other—opposite sex which should happen at puberty—not before. Boys should prefer being with boys as girls, with girls during a healthy normal childhood.
Introducing homosexuality will confuse the worldview of children. They do not have the experience or understanding to realize that they are NOT homosexual—because nature designed them to prefer the same sex during the latency period—sexuality is naturally suppressed during this age for normal sexual development.
For civil society, we need children to see human beings with dignity and respect—apart from making them a sexual object which demeans human beings and always confuses children too immature to understand the sexual emotions. It always corrupts the worldview of children and forces them to look at others in a sexual way, even their parents.
Sex Ed in schools removes morality and meaning from the sexual act and reduces it to a base urge and encourages children to “just do it for fun!” It is a very dangerous concept to all civil societies which is why the Cultural Marxists devised Sex Ed to corrupt children and destroy Western Civ.
" long winded rants against Howard Stern"
That makes a loon? C'mon you gotta do better than that.
Just because one is a bit passionate about a subject does not make them a loon.
This article was very short, with no over hype.
I can understand if you disagree with someone.
You just appear childish if you call people names.
I agree with just about all of your post. The only thing that I somewhat disagree with is only hanging with same sex from 6-12. I grew up and always had a really good female friend as well as male friends. I think it made me understand girls better than most boys.
I agree. This is ridiculous.
Always wondered why people don’t ask (themselves and others who are influenced) what does gay “Pride” means and what is there to be “proud” of which the gay activists are pushing, along with “pretty” rainbows.
I understand that “pride” is a recruiting and cultivating tool - to make the otherwise mostly miserable and unhappy “real life” lifestile seem glamorous and happy (the original meaning of the word “gay”) when preying mostly on the young and sexually or spiritually confused...
But why is there no natural curiousity about what the meaning and the source of the gay “pride” is and what the minority of the population (by most research accounts, 2%-3%, including bisexuals and “college experience”) may find there to be “proud” of?
It’s a good question to ask those who are confused and/or have been brainwashed by the deliberate propaganda in the media, that devotes inordinate time and effort to the issue in an attempt to glamorize it or make the lifestyle seem “normal” and natural. Does “proud” only mean “different” and it is exactly that and/or the “attention” they are really looking for or attracted to?
Maybe the light bulbs will light up in their heads and many will start to question the currently “politically correct conventional wisdom” about what pride really means and why it is used to promote unnatural and unhealthy lifestyle. Being a “freak” is not the kind of “attention” or being “different” that most of the youth are seeking.
How it it doing that? Is it telling the kids that it is o.k. if a boy to smokes another boy’s bone or it if a girl eats another girl’s hole.
Erm. . . what is your point, exactly?
Well, the idea is, that she could confuse young people who were merely going through a phase of being curious or confused, into thinking they were “born that way”. By endorsing it, she is giving the green light on something they should be guided out of.
A friend of mine knew a woman who was a separatist lesbian for 10 years, only to wake up one day and realized she had been tricked by the movement. She really liked men, and felt she had wasted her youth thinking she was a lesbian.
Well, that may be so. So in your opinion Lady Gaga’s endorsement is harmless, and the AFA guy is a nut for thinking she could lead anyone astray? By the way: It is young girls, and not young guys, who are the really vulnerable ones here. It is easier to trick a girl into being a lesbian than to trick a guy into thinking he is gay. So girls should be protected form going “ga ga”. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.