Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36; Fred Garvin-MP

“He could consider himself to be a Leprechaun.
There is no “racial category” for Leprechaun either.’

The 1964 report you posted up thread says this:

“Also beginning with 1964 ill-defined or not clearly identifiable races are assigned to “race not stated. ” This includes such reports as “oriental” and “yellow, ” which in previous years were assigned to a specific category such as other nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese.”

So according to the NIHS, they sometimes saw “yellow” reported as a race. Is that one of the race categories?

And before 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be forced into one of the specific categories like “nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese” But after 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be coded as “race not stated.”


150 posted on 07/24/2012 12:40:39 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan
So what has 1964 info got to do with 1961?
And it still doesn't explain how "African" got on there.

And before 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be forced into one of the specific categories like “nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese”

And even now, whether you realize it or not, you're admitting that there was no "specific category" of "African" for anything to be forced into.

Here ya go...what "specific category" would Caucasian go in?

153 posted on 07/24/2012 1:18:13 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson