[marktwain]

The MSM is actually pleased with and arrogant about their ignorance of guns and weapons in general.

[MNJohnnie]

Yep he really demonstrated himself absolutely factually clueless on this issue. In addition, he is so arrogantly emotionally hysteric he refused to listen to his guest when the guest tried to correct his rabid hysteric ignorance. Why anyone watches this blowhard egomaniac moron is beyond me.

[LibLieSlayer]

I flushed the turd formally known as o’reilly a few years ago. I no longer smell him.

LLS

[smokingfrog]

[MileHi]

I watched the end tonight for the letters. One asked what a “heavy duty weapon” was. He said that was up to congress to decide.

So I guess congress are idiots because they haven't passed a law to track a term he made up and he doesn't know the meaning of?

Just watching out for the folks...

[publius911]

When seconds count, the police are just minutes away.
And they will treat your remains restpectfully, and make sure they are delivered to the coroner or medical examiner. And they will do that for about $100k a year and 80% of final salary and full health benefits on retirement.

What's the problem?

Why are more civilians killed each year than LEOs?

[Kickass Conservative]

RE: #10. People think Cops carry guns to protect the Public.

Cops carry guns to protect themselves, just as every Free Citizen has a God Given Right to do.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

“Did you watch O’Reilly last night?”

O’Reilley has drunk deeply of the Josh Suggarman kool aide.

Josh Sugarmann
Violence Policy Center Director

“Assault weapons... are a new topic. The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

-Josh Sugarmann, “Assault Weapons: Analysis, New Research and Legislation”, March 1989

“The NRA is right...handgun controls do little to stop criminals from obtaining handguns.”

-Josh Sugarman, former communications director for the Coalition Against Gun Violence

[Bob]

From the article:

Remember, cops carry guns to protect themselves as do the majority of Americans.

Sadly, that's not the case. I think what he meant was:

...as do the majority of Americans who carry guns.

[bigbob]

If people want to send a message to O’Bloviator in Chief Bill O’Reilly it is very simple: Don’t buy his books.

Hollering at him won’t help because he doesn’t care what you think and he went to Harvard. Besides he’d never hear you over his own hollering. And he won’t read your e-mail because he’s got people for that, and besides, email is for pinheads...

[imardmd1]

11. Because I carry a gun does not mean that I am obligated to protect you — that’s your concern, protect yourself.

[familyop]

If some crazy individual were to ever indiscriminately spray rounds in my vicinity, I’d rather they were firing full auto. More likely to miss my central nervous parts and give me a chance to get away. ;-)