Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Average Americans don't need assault weapons
CNN ^ | Sun July 29, 2012 | By Roland Martin, CNN Contributor

Posted on 07/29/2012 8:40:38 PM PDT by redreno

CNN) -- To all of you gun lovers, feel free to go buy your Glock, shotgun, hunting rifle, .22 pistol, .357 Magnum or any of the other guns at your disposal.

But you do not need an AK-47.

For some, it's too soon to discuss gun reform, a little more than one week after the mass killings in Aurora, Colorado. I disagree. Too many Americans are being killed by guns every day; this most recent heinous tragedy should not keep us from having a rational debate.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2012; banglist; democrats; fastandfurious; govtabuse; gunrunner; guns; liberalfascism; semiautomaticrifle; shallnotbeinfringed; tyranny; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: redreno
My buddy had a very good counter-argument: The COPS don't need them either. IF they ever encounter someone with a military-grade semi-automatic rifle, they do NOT need to match him, round-for-round, in a spray-and-pray contest. ONE bullet from a .45 service revolver... or, even if he has body armor, ONE round from any decent deer rifle... and the encounter is over. And yet, dozens, if not HUNDREDS, of police stations across the country have even 50 cal BMGs ($10,000 monsters that I'd give my cousins away in trade for), and yet have never once been used in an appropriate police action. If the police get rid of THEIR big toys, then MAYBE we can talk about getting rid of ours.

But my counter-point to my buddy is that someday we will need to encounter at least some part of our own military head-to-head... and having a few matching personal arms would be very important at that time.

121 posted on 07/30/2012 7:22:55 AM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMCinSC

I’m of two minds where it comes to explosives, personally. There are a LOT of people I wouldn’t trust to have tanks, mines, bombs, etc. But I haven’t reasoned out yet whether it makes sense to restrict them, constitutionally.

As far as firearms, I believe that ownership and safe use should be free - but unsafe use (including criminal use) should carry restriction. If I were to have an automatic weapon, and don’t put any other person in danger when I use it (excluding self defense use), then it should be legal, IMO. (And FUN!)


122 posted on 07/30/2012 9:24:40 AM PDT by MortMan (Laughter is the best medicine, especially when ridiculing your enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Just what I need -- some ignorant, arrogant city-slicker telling me what I 'need' and 'what I can do'.

ESAD, Roland Martin. And everyone else who thinks like you.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

123 posted on 07/30/2012 10:02:57 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
"And so you know, the shooter at the theater used an AR-15, not an AK-47. Lucky for the rest of the people there. It jammed. An AK-47 wouldn’t have.

Cite a source to the AR jamming please.

124 posted on 07/30/2012 10:19:39 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Average Americans don't need assault weapons

It's The Bill of RIGHTS, not the bill of needs.

125 posted on 07/30/2012 10:29:45 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; Cobra64; panaxanax

Guess I shoulda used my sarcasm tag ;)


126 posted on 07/30/2012 10:30:33 AM PDT by West Texas Chuck (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Durus

“Cite a source to the AR jamming please.”

Me. One year of Vietnam service using the M-16 which is just the full-automatic version of the AR. That ought to count for something.

Maybe the the jamming problems are fixed now, I can’t say. On the other hand, you could drag an AK through mud and cow dung, bake it in the oven, and chances are it’ll still fire. /s


127 posted on 07/30/2012 10:38:47 AM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“...And it’s great that I can still buy one, when I do think it will be necessary...”

Certainly it is your personal choice. But remember, by the time you think it’s necessary, it may be too late. When they’re kicking in your front door, it’s not the time to be reaching for the yellow pages.


128 posted on 07/30/2012 10:53:51 AM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Bingo. Odd how few notice this.

The scenario is in-home defense. If a stranger is coming up the stairs at oh-dark-thirty, all questions are answered about why he’s there and what should be done.
I’ve decided on an AR15 SBR.
Why wouldn’t I want more rounds in-mag than I’d need? Running out in a firefight is a Bad Thing(TM).
Why wouldn’t I want powerful rounds? The goal is assured incapacitation, not annoyance.
Why wouldn’t I want a compact platform? Not a lot of room to move indoors; the longer the harder & slower.
Why wouldn’t I want a suppressor? Can’t put muffs on everyone before proceeding.
Why wouldn’t I want fragmenting rounds? Punching thru something is vital; punching thru the next layer of sheetrock must be minimized.
Why wouldn’t I want rapid fire? Think about what the target is trying to do.

I realize “AK47” is a generic, albeit improper, term.
His declaration that I don’t need one comes with no explanation why, nor even with a suggestion that something less capable would be enough, nor even a hint of his consideration of the scenarios involved.

And that’s what’s wonderful about a free country: the whims of the ignorant do not obviate the rights of the informed.


129 posted on 07/30/2012 11:12:04 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

The Constitution’s “Letters of Marque and Reprisal” clause presumes the private possession of battleships and cannons.


130 posted on 07/30/2012 11:15:42 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Durus

https://www.google.com/search?q=jammed&tbm=nws


131 posted on 07/30/2012 11:18:05 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Fareed Zakaria? WTF would you know about what is or isn’t American, you piece of camel dung!


132 posted on 07/30/2012 12:06:33 PM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Sorry, I think I misunderstood your request. I got the info about the jamming during the crime from one of the news reports. I thought you were asking about the jamming history of the weapon itself.


133 posted on 07/30/2012 12:45:27 PM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
Thanks for your service. The military PTBs, in their infinite wisdom, decided to change the powder that the stoner design was tested and validated on, to a power that the caused serious issues. The military PTB's blamed the soldiers then the design but when the powder problem got figured out so did the jamming problems.

Of course none of this is going to make one of those jam-o-matic drum contraptions work...and they don't magically work because they are plugged into AKs either.

134 posted on 07/30/2012 1:04:58 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I’m liking your logic so far...what caliber have you chosen for this?


135 posted on 07/30/2012 1:13:53 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: redreno
“To all of you gun lovers, feel free to go buy your Glock, shotgun, hunting rifle, .22 pistol, .357 Magnum or any of the other guns at your disposal.”

For now, just until they get THIS piece bitten off the Second Amendment. Next time they will take bites off your Glock!

In point of fact, AK-47s and AR-15s are too large and too expensive for criminal use and maniacs are never deterred by laws anyway.

Further, the Second Amendment is all about MILITARY style weaponry, NOT hunting. Fully automatic weapons are currently HIGHLY regulated and unavailable to the average user.

These jackasses are so transparent. Do anything you can to get one type of weapon out of citizen hands, then proceed to the NEXT subject. And on, and on, and on, until you create a society of helpless unarmed sheep as, for instance, in England and Norway.

Its ESSENTIAL to fight this battle in the Congress, the Courts and anywhere else we need to. Scalia’s comments are indicative of the fact that even our friends can be swayed by maniac who kill with guns, and maniacs in the news media.

Chris (Are you a flake?) Wallace's interview and Scalia’s chilling response indicates that all the logic initially thrown out after the Colorado massacre by Lott and others on the realities of gun control’s failures, just evaporated in the wake of Michael Bloomberg’s comments and those who think emote like him.

136 posted on 07/30/2012 1:54:45 PM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Heavy cannelured (crimped) 5.56 rounds from an 11.5” barrel. Seems it has lowest wall penetration while retaining the still-effective incapacitation rate prior to hitting that wall; fragments upon first penetration (sheetrock or perp), minimal effect upon hitting second layer of sheetrock. Best option short of reinforcing/armoring key walls.

Yeah, 5.56 doesn’t have a good reputation, but given the scenario there’s an important tradeoff between doing the job and not doing it “too well”.

To the point of the thread: given a viable application and cold analysis of the problem, average Americans DO need AWs.


137 posted on 07/30/2012 1:57:24 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: tet68

The FAL is a nice rifle reliable & real hard hitting. 8*)


138 posted on 07/30/2012 2:38:41 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nebr FAL owner

Glad I bought one when I did, couldn’t afford one now.


139 posted on 07/30/2012 2:52:46 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

“Certainly it is your personal choice. But remember, by the time you think it’s necessary, it may be too late. When they’re kicking in your front door, it’s not the time to be reaching for the yellow pages.”

I know what you’re saying...I’m just making the point regarding that it isn’t just gun-owning whackos (in the eyes of the media) that benefit from a gun-owning society.


140 posted on 07/30/2012 3:11:11 PM PDT by BobL ( It's easy to be a saint when you have nothing on the line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson