Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim group blasts judge over "sea monster" comparison (Judge tosses CAIR and ACLU lawsuit)
Yahoo ^ | 8/15/12 | Dan Whitcomb - Reuters

Posted on 08/15/2012 10:14:49 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A Muslim rights group criticized a federal judge on Wednesday, complaining he had compared the civil liberties of Muslim Americans to a "hideous sea monster" while tossing out a lawsuit over the infiltration of California mosques by an FBI informant.

U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney dismissed the lawsuit on Tuesday, which charged that the undercover FBI informant had violated civil liberties of U.S. Muslims by spying on them, ruling that allowing the case to proceed could risk disclosure of government secrets.

In his 36-page order, Carney invoked the fictional Greek hero Odysseus, who was forced to sail his ship between a six-headed sea monster and a dangerous whirlpool during an epic voyage home from the Trojan War.

"Odysseus opted to pass by the monster and risk a few of his individual sailors, rather than hazard the loss of his entire ship to the sucking whirlpool," Carney wrote. "Similarly, the proper application of the state secrets privilege may unfortunately mean the sacrifice of individual liberties for the sake of national security."

Carney allowed the case to go forward only against five current or former agents named as individual defendants, who the plaintiffs claim violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Plaintiffs attorneys have said they will appeal.

"Our civil liberties are not a hideous sea monster, but they are instead the most stalwart defense against the real threats of tyranny and oppression," Ameena Mirza Qazi, deputy executive director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said in a written statement.

The lawsuit, jointly filed by CAIR and the American Civil Liberties Union last year in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, said the FBI sent undercover informant Craig Monteilh into Orange County mosques to collect personal information on hundreds, or possibly thousands, of Muslims.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cair; comparison; fbi; fisa; muslim; seamonster; wot

1 posted on 08/15/2012 10:14:58 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
hey CAIR...go back to the 8th century hellhole you call home.

2 posted on 08/15/2012 11:06:04 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I hope Romney puts this judge on a short list for the SCOTUS after he is elected.


3 posted on 08/15/2012 11:16:21 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
When the next Attorney General is vetted, it must be with the understanding that he will exercise every legal means to eradicate the virus of islam from America.
4 posted on 08/16/2012 2:16:34 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Obamacare - Constitutional Despotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
compared the civil liberties of Muslim Americans to a "hideous sea monster"

Seems spot on to me.

5 posted on 08/16/2012 3:06:22 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Seems far too kind to me.

Totalitarian political systems inimical to everything the US stands for should not be tolerated.


6 posted on 08/16/2012 3:19:35 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Similarly, the proper application of the state secrets privilege may unfortunately mean the sacrifice of individual liberties for the sake of national security."

That's an Orwellian statement. I understand about Muslims, though, and think their pseudo-religion is really a political cult, which is plotting against us, but the nature of the statement makes me wonder what is the point of liberty if it can be so easily sacrificed? In other words, who gets to decide when government gets to invoke "the sake of national security"?

7 posted on 08/16/2012 4:27:50 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Okay, Muzzies. You’re the whirlpool then. Happy?


8 posted on 08/16/2012 6:31:15 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
I understand about Muslims, though, and think their pseudo-religion is really a political cult, which is plotting against us, but the nature of the statement makes me wonder what is the point of liberty if it can be so easily sacrificed? In other words, who gets to decide when government gets to invoke "the sake of national security"?

Indeed. "National security" is not the root passphrase to the U.S. Constitution. The burden on the government should be fairly high if they want to keep something secret. That's not the way a police state works though.

9 posted on 08/16/2012 6:42:32 AM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Carney wrote. “Similarly, the proper application of the state secrets privilege may unfortunately mean the sacrifice of individual liberties for the sake of national security.”

“Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither. Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security.” B. Franklin

That’s all I have to say....


10 posted on 08/16/2012 6:44:21 AM PDT by mikemoose (Pray for the Unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

bmfl


11 posted on 08/16/2012 9:16:11 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikemoose

Those who grant our rights to jihadi scum who use those rights to BEHEAD US, are fools or useful infidels.

- Yehuda


12 posted on 08/16/2012 9:54:51 AM PDT by Yehuda (http://jewpoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
I hope Romney puts this judge on a short list for a complete and thorough vetting of his rulings in order to determine that he follows the Constitution. Once it's determined he does, his name can be added to the list of candidates for the SCOTUS. after he is elected.

Sorry, I had to.

13 posted on 08/16/2012 10:03:14 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks NormsRevenge.


14 posted on 08/17/2012 4:48:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson