Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Inconvenient Truthteller
Say what now? British law doesn't apply on Ecuadorian soil any more than Scottish law applies on US soil.

This law revokes an embassy's status as (for example) Ecuadorian soil if there is an abuse of diplomatic and consular premises. As much as I despise the rapist from WikiLeaks, I do not think granting him asylum should trigger this act. Still, with the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act of 1987, it is technically within the law for the UK to carry out their threat, if they define granting this person asylum as abuse.

11 posted on 08/16/2012 7:47:40 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

It might be ok under British law. (a law based on Libyans shooting a British police woman from INSIDE the Libyan embassy)
But it’s still a violation of the treaty of 1961 which they signed. As far as the British calling asylum “abuse”, is the British argument basically that nobody could ever need asylum from them? Amazing disconnect.

And Assange a rapist? This is over consensual sex when a condom broke, it isn’t rape in any sense we would recognize.


12 posted on 08/16/2012 10:27:52 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1

There are several issues with Assange. First, the way that he got into legal trouble....was having a number of liaisons with women and behaving like some dimwit “James Bond” character. Two women compared notes (Swedish women, no less) and decided that he had violated a number of rules of trust. They actually reported the events, and the Swedes want to charge him. Based on what I’ve seen.....he might get two years of prison out of this deal at the very most.

Second, throughout his entire life....he’s violated various laws and ethics. He’s been put in jeopardy of prison on number of times.....but never actually put in prison. His personal belief is that there’s always option “B”....just let him go.

Third, he never had a father figure in his entire life. His mother was the intellectual type who mostly taught her son to never trust the government. This guy, in my humble opinion.....can’t “man-up” and admit his screw-ups.

The Brits ought to march in....take him with handcuffs out of the building in full view....onto a waiting helicopter and fly him immediately to Sweden. If I were king of England, I wouldn’t hesitate....just order the guys to make it happen and rid the isle of a nutcase who shouldn’t be there. The Swedes know what to do next. Let Assange sit out two years in a Swedish prison....preferably with no internet.


18 posted on 08/17/2012 4:11:08 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson