Posted on 08/18/2012 4:09:06 PM PDT by NoLibZone
I think Paul Ryan is the perfect spec I didn't see it until Romney did it. I said -- Romney he'll make the right choice and I was right he made the right choice it's a beautiful synergy is the perfect combo platter there.
And there were many -- predicting he'd go safe there's a bold -- to this decision here's a here's my take on us. He said. We're gonna take on your economic ideas your failed policies we're gonna offer a bold alternative.
Video at link
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
You realize that doesn't make sense, don't you?
If you had discovered that Romney had in fact murdered someone in the past would you be saying "time to get over it"?
So, getting over something depends on the enormity of the offense in the eyes of each beholder.
You say to me, "That's an over-the-top example. The example is irrelevant to the rule. It depends on how the offended person views the offense.
The truth is, Norway, that a committed, pro-life voter believes that with his $50 abortions that Romney IS complicit in murdering many, tiny someones.
2007 race
Dr. John Willke Endorses Mitt Romney
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/willke-romney/2007/10/22/id/321953
Dr. Willke, helped found the National Right To Life Committee and served for 10 years as its president. Dr. Willke serves as president of the Life Issues Institute, Inc., and president of the International Right to Life Federation.
National Right To Life
04/18/12
http://www.nrlpac.org/pdf/POTUS%20Comparison.pdf
Comparison chart Romney and Obama
Apparently, meg, there are many believers who take this more seriously than does Wilke.
In 2007, Romney was still describing is position as effectively pro-choice.
As the thread in 2007 pointed out, Wilke was duped.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/08/17/new-obama-tv-ad-attacks-romney-ryans-pro-life-views/
Obama ad attacking pro life views of R and R
Romney has improved..note his views in comparison to Obamas from my previous link
I am not trying to change your mind or your vote..
Sunday Blessings.
I watched the ad, and it’s obviously targeting women, and especially liberal or social-net women.
OTOH, a majority of the population now sides with the pro-life position to the extent that abortions must be the absolute minimum.
The hotwire in the ad was “rape and incest”. There aren’t many who really care about Planned Parenthood. I’m assuming that those instances in which Ryan supported limiting rape/incest abortions are those in which there is evidence that there was no rape or incest. I would call that confusion. They don’t support abortion for women who for whatever reason have a confused state of mind when it comes to killing their baby.
I don’t support killing anyone with a trial and due process of law.
http://www.nrlpac.org/pdf/POTUS%20Comparison.pdf
I was interested to see the differences in the Obama/ Romney positions as one or the other will be president in 2013.
If hearing about the extremity of Romney's liberalism is "getting old" -- what bigger warning sign do you need that you're about to make a big mistake? A year, two years, into a Romney term, how "old" would it be getting then, as you watched him serenely frog-march the entire Republican party to the left as moderate Republicans and his Democrat "friends" across the aisle supported the Beloved Romney (after all, Americans voted for him in droves!) in his "progressive" quest to "fix" the health care problem, the gay discrimination problem, the global warming problem, the abortion problem, and the judicial problem, by doing all the things Democrats do.
But you are busy squeezing your eyes shut, putting your fingers in your ears, and chanting: "nanananananananana ... we couldnt' survie another four years of Obama we couldn't survive another four years of Obama nanananananan...." in order to make yourself sanction giving more power to liberals -- and that is EXACTLY and ONLY what your vote for Romney would do.
And how will you be "getting over it" when Romney's in office and using moderate Republicans along with Democrats to advance all the liberal causes you KNOW RIGHT NOW he is likely to advance?
As for admonishing me for copying and pasting the same thing over, and over, and over, and over -- you blind, stupid moron -- go into my in-forum posts and find where I have done that with my own posts EVEN ONCE. You are both an idiot and a liar, and obviously you DON'T ACTUALLY READ what people write.
You perfectly reflect the shallow, fuzzy-seeing mindset that being a Romney supporter requires.
And you have Path C, the only constructive, conservative path: vote to weaken the mandate of whichever statist government tyrant wins.
If hearing about the extremity of Romney’s liberalism is “getting old” — what bigger warning sign do you need that you’re about to make a big mistake? A year, two years, into a Romney term, how “old” would it be getting then, as you watched him serenely frog-march the entire Republican party to the left as moderate Republicans and his Democrat “friends” across the aisle supported the Beloved Romney (after all, Americans voted for him in droves!) in his “progressive” quest to “fix” the health care problem, the gay discrimination problem, the global warming problem, the abortion problem, and the judicial problem, by doing all the things Democrats do.
But you are busy squeezing your eyes shut, putting your fingers in your ears, and chanting: “nanananananananana ... we couldnt’ survie another four years of Obama we couldn’t survive another four years of Obama nanananananan....” in order to make yourself sanction giving more power to liberals — and that is EXACTLY and ONLY what your vote for Romney would do.
If C means turmoil, upheaval at the convention then that remains to be seen.
If C means some hyperbole, imagined scenario in your mind that does not yet exist, then you’re dreaming.
Otherwise, what you posted is sheer nonsense. We don’t have time to play around.
Too many here opt for expressing their hate rather than restoring our Republic by tossing obomo from the People’s house.
There’s a reason I didn’t contribute this time. Perhaps after the election if sanity returns to the forum.
Unfortunately, Meg, that should have been a comparison of the positions supported by each candidate when they’ve been in office. It is good to see the official positions of their campaign, and I know you’ve heard all about Mitt’s flip-flops.
It’s because of those that he is not trustworthy to those of us who think he merely adapted his position when he decided to run for president. And that would have been the 2008 primary season.
And do you also believe in the tooth fairy? Because I'm here to tell you that the tooth fairy is as much a figment of your imagination as the idea that voting third party is "the same as voting for Obama."
You're quite right, we don't have time to play games like handing the Republican party over to wholesale liberal statists like Romney and expecting a minority of conservative Republicans to "hold his feet to the fire." Time has run out. It's now time to face the music and FIGHT BACK, and the only way to fight back is to hold fast.
Please consider Tom Hoefling for President.
You don't have to be ashamed if you vote for Tom.
“Wow. SOMEBODY’S got a hate on for Ann Coulter. This probably goes back for her early and earnest support fo Mitt Romney,”
Nope. Started with her support for GOProud, and her support for Myth Romney was merely the last straw.
Pardon me for calling you a shitheel leech, pal. You're the one recommending insanity by urging folks to vote FOR the original author of Obamacare and gay marriage. That you didn't contribute "this time" to the FReepathon but are still here posting, illustrates how the behavior of Romney's supporters, even (perhaps especially) their reluctant ones, speaks VOLUMES about their candidate.
We don’t have time to play around.
Please consider Tom Hoefling for President.
You don’t have to be ashamed if you vote for Tom.
1992 Perot.
I thought I was smarter than my parents.
Tell me, what percent vote will Tom receive?
Tell me how many states he won’t be on the ballot?
Tell me which party will he pull votes from?
You know the answers; that results in 0bama killing off our country.
I can’t even believe there are some so hell bent on principles that they’re willing to lose their country just to be right. Do you realize after 2012 if Romney doesn’t win your pipe dream of the perfect candidate won’t have a chance to be noticed now or 2016????
If you suggest C being Perot, then you are voting for 0bama.
And do you also believe in the tooth fairy? Because I’m here to tell you that the tooth fairy is as much a figment of your imagination as the idea that voting third party is “the same as voting for Obama.”
You’re quite right, we don’t have time to play games like handing the Republican party over to wholesale liberal statists like Romney and expecting a minority of conservative Republicans to “hold his feet to the fire.” Time has run out. It’s now time to face the music and FIGHT BACK, and the only way to fight back is to hold fast.
1992 Perot.
I thought I was smarter than my parents.
Tell me, what percent vote will Tom receive?
Tell me how many states he won’t be on the ballot?
Tell me which party will he pull votes from?
You know the answers; that results in 0bama killing off our country.
I can’t even believe there are some so hell bent on principles that they’re willing to lose their country just to be right. Do you realize after 2012 if Romney doesn’t win your pipe dream of the perfect candidate won’t have a chance to be noticed now or 2016????
If? If Romney doesn't win???
I'm hoping that when Romney doesn't win, conservatives will unite behind a suitable candidate in 2016.
And, it isn't impossible that the GOP could nominate an appropriate candidate this year. If it is made clear enough to Romney that his candidacy is doomed, maybe he'll do the right thing and withdraw or agree to run for vice-president, as in Ryan-Romney, for example.
I’m hoping that when Romney doesn’t win, conservatives will unite behind a suitable candidate in 2016.
There won’t be a country.
Why isn’t that clear to you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.