Fourty-one consecutive hands the dealer didn't get a clue? I don't feel real bad for the house.
Posted on 08/21/2012 5:05:53 AM PDT by grundle
So the casino gambled that the cards would be
pre-shuffled.......and lost?
Irony is cool.
There are such swindlers in casinos.....CNBC's "American Greed" series ran the story about a Vietnamese group that swindled casinos out of millions.
They were very sophisticated, using electronics, and hordes of accomplices in the scheme, traveling from one casino to another ........was going great except for one huge boo-boo.
They hired people to participate---but one of them was an undercover agent who caught the ringleader on tape.
This is a little like Kamikaze pilots suiting Mitsubishi.
In one notorious casino swindling case-——the dealer was the swindler.
At first, casino security could not figure out how he was stealing.
They studied videotapes over and over-—then noticed the dealer was wearing a large watch——he would slip $100 chips under the face of the watch and walk out with them.
Accomplices would cash them in.
Yep, the cards were shuffled back into order,,,
thats how good they are.
Um, doesn’t this casino have those card shuffling machines, or doesn’t the dealer shuffle the cards? Did they open a new pack of cards with each hand or something? Sounds to me like the procedures of the casino are to blame here.
If you read the article (I know, a FR tradition encourages commenting without reading), you’ll see the casino buys the cards from the manufacturer pre-shuffled. The card manufacturer delivered unshuffled decks of cards.
-PJ
Anybody can win blackjack by using memorized Monte Carlo non-successive damped sequence algorithms. I did this in Reno for 3 months- Then they blackballed me at all the casinos. So I taught my friends how to do it and they all cleaned up.
Indeed. Being a professional nerd, I'm amazed at the fact that anyone could trust an online casino. Even if the casino is entirely legitimate, and tries its best to run an honest house, the chances of them having decent random number generators with a true source of randomness (like, say radioactive decay), is vanishingly small.
However, the article also stated that the dealer dealt the same sequence of cards over and over again. Not sure how that would have happened unless they didn't shuffle between games or, instead, used a new deck each time (all of which were unshuffled).
I'm not an expert on how casinos operate, so maybe it is common practice to open a new deck of cards for each game.
Pre-shuffled cards? Is that really that much of a time-saver? Plus I’ve never seen a game that doesn’t have a time out for shuffling by hand. The only exception was the Bellagio that had these toilet seat looking gizmos attached to the 6 deck shoe where the old cards are deposited, shuffled and put back. No game stoppage.
If the contract says cards are supposed to be delivered pre-shuffled and the weren’t that’s a valid suit. Of course the dealer should have caught this before the gamers did and shut down the table. The players definitely didn’t do anything wrong.
Usually casinos only go part way through a deck, helps keep counters at bay since the second half of the deck is predictable by the first half. Depending on the game and the shoe (some shoes get loaded with one deck some with lots) it could 1 deck 1 game. Probably not with baccarat since there’s no strategy, probably closer to 1 deck 5 or 6 games, but then if the next deck runs the exact same pattern (again it’s a no strategy game, all games deal the exact same number of cards in the same order, easy to spot a pattern develop). And in casinos you never reshuffle, used cards are trash, they usually actually nick them in some way so they’re easily identifiable as used.
Fourty-one consecutive hands the dealer didn't get a clue? I don't feel real bad for the house.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.