First he said conception, not miscarriage. And secondly, you know how subjective studies of that type are? What stress factors were involved? What levels did they manifest themselves at? Were there extraneous factors such as genetics or environment? The list goes on and on. Yes, lets split hairs to defend another lethal brain-farter just because he supports our pet cause. Whats next from him, an SBD?
You’re misquoting him. Where in this text do you find the word, or even the idea, of conception?
Akin: “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down. But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something: I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the child”
Second, I know of no studies on anything that are perfect? Why? Humans are involved. We all bring our own pair of glasses to everything we look at. Even you. That’s why there is peer review. And that’s why there’s free speech. We sort it out by talking it out. If you want to find flaws in the studies I presented, fine. Present them, so the entire class will know how bad those studies are. I wait with bated breath.