Posted on 08/24/2012 2:33:43 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll
Whittaker Chambers said that "the great failing of American conservatives is they do not retrieve their wounded."
He had it right, as Todd Akin can testify.
In an interview that aired last Sunday, Akin, the Republican candidate for Senate in Missouri, was asked whether he opposed abortions for women who had been raped. Akin's reply:
"From what I understand from doctors, that's really rare. ... If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down ... .
"But let's assume that maybe that didn't work or something. I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child."
As no rape is "legitimate," this was a colossal gaffe.
Yet anyone reading his statement knows what Akin meant. He was saying that in an actual rape – from what doctors have told him – the likelihood of pregnancy is rare. But if a pregnancy did occur, the punishment should be imposed on the rapist not the unborn child.
This was the moral position of those extremists John Paul II and Ronald Reagan. Of more interest, then, was the Republican reaction.
Howls for Akin to get out of the race came from pundits, talk show hosts, members of the Senate and the GOP's monied elite that is raising hundreds of millions in hope of a sweep of both houses of Congress and the White House in November. Akin is henceforth not to get a dime.
Even Paul Ryan, whose position on abortion appears identical to that of Akin, called and urged him to drop out.
Who came to Akin's defense? The Family Research Council. As President Nixon once told me, "Count your friends when you're down."
What does this hysteria over one egregious gaffe reveal?
A deep-seated fear, a gnawing anxiety among Republicans that the positions they have held and hold on social and moral issues, and even on economics and foreign policy, no longer command the support of a majority of their countrymen.
Consider. While the three amigos – John McCain, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham – are all for intervention in Syria, the Republican Party has fallen largely silent.
Where are the Republican and neocon hawks of yesteryear now that Barack Obama is pulling out of Afghanistan, when the expected result of a U.S. withdrawal is a Taliban takeover and massacre of many of those Afghans foolish enough to have cast their lot with the Americans?
Any Republicans demanding we stay the course in Afghanistan?
Rather than hearing the old paeans to free trade we used to get from Bush I and II, Republicans now talk about getting tough with China and fighting the "unfair" trade practices of foreign regimes.
Milton Friedman, whose writings Republicans once read as gospel, said we should throw America's markets open to the world, no matter the protectionist policies of others, because cheaper imports benefit all of America's consumers.
No Republican talks like that anymore. Yet none seems to have a solution to these endless trade deficits debilitating our economy other than to ignore them or accuse the Chinese of "currency manipulation."
With homosexual marriage gaining converts among the young, the party of the Moral Majority declines to stand with Chick-fil-A.
On right-to-life, see the Republicans flee from Todd Akin, who committed a gaffe while restating his support for what has been a plank of the Republican platform since 1980.
Bewailing deficits, Republicans demand a balanced budget. And the Ryan budget does that – in 28 years.
Why so long? Because real budget cuts entail real pain.
Where is Mitt Romney going to slash a budget that consumes a fourth of the U.S. economy?
Not defense. Mitt promises to increase that. He cannot cut interest on the debt, which must rise as interest rates climb from today's near-zero levels. He says he will not cut Medicare.
Is he going to cut Social Security? How about taking an ax to Medicaid, food stamps, student loans, school lunches, Head Start, aid to education, Pell Grants, EPA, the FBI and the earned income tax credit?
What the reactions to Akin's gaffe and the congressional skinny-dipper in the Sea of Galilee expose is a fear in the soul of the GOP that history is passing it by and the end may be near.
For decades, the GOP has been the party that cuts marginal tax rates, opposes abortion, defends traditional marriage, sends troops to fight for our values abroad and slashes government spending.
Today's GOP establishment is queasy even talking about social issues and recognizes that the new America has had it with the Afghanistans and Iraqs, wants to raise taxes on the wealthiest 1 percent and contains scores of millions who will punish any politician who threatens their benefits.
The GOP's insoluble problem is that the multicultural, multiethnic and multilingual country they created with their open borders appears not to like the brand of dog food the party sells.
Beating up on Todd Akin is not going to change that.
Oh boy, now it’s time to attack Buchanan instead of reading the article.
What Pat said.
Wow...Pat nails it
The over-reaction to the Akin comments from the Liberal wing of the GOP have been incessant. You think the Dem. Underground had a GOP branch.
Of course, the PhonyCon Pro-Aborts should be on here attacking Buchanan in 3...2...1...
Good news Pat sayin’ and Akin stayin’
Word.
I guess we have some conservatives who, if they had been captain instead of John Paul Jones, wouldn’t have said “I have not yet begun to fight”, but would’ve peed their pants and run up a white flag. Maybe they could wave coulter’s underwear.
Thank you Patrick. it is about time someone brought this into focus.
I don’t always agree with with Pat - but he nailed this one.
IMO - any “principled-purists” calling for Akin to step down have shown themselves to be neither.
” The GOP’s insoluble problem is that the multicultural, multiethnic and multilingual country they created with their open borders appears not to like the brand of dog food the party sells.
Beating up on Todd Akin is not going to change that.”
Bingo
Were I a Missourian, I'd vote for Akin as opposed to McCaskill. But I wouldn't confuse Todd Akin with John Paul Jones. More like a George Armstrong Custer...
“Maybe they could wave coulter’s underwear.”
They would have to get it from Mitt...he controls Ann’s underwear. She is a future “Sister Wife” for the Magic Mormon.
.....IMO - any “principled-purists” calling for Akin to step down have shown themselves to be neither....
Exactly. well Stated. Thank You
IIRC Buchanan has been an enemy of the Neocons who got us unto Iraq and Afghanistan and now he’s bemoaning the GOP’s lack of testicles for not speaking up for further interventionist policies? Oh, the irony.
By “Liberal wing” I suppose you mean anyone who disagrees with you.
But if a Republican is caught littering, there is hell to pay.
So Republicans have to be more careful, more finessed. Until schools of journalism become more balanced, a Republican who yells “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” is simply going to get torpedoed.
Write it backwards. What ending do you want? Start with that and pursue a logical progression thatt leads to it.
Pat, you hit the target ...
Crap. Wrong thread!
Chuckles.
Hopefully, unlike Custer, this one mistake by Akin is a footnote - rather than the definition - of an otherwise exemplary life & career.
I was just about to try once again to find that quote.. I had it wrong with something more like "kill their own."
I believe that Chambers predicted that the commies would win based upon what he experienced and witnessed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.