Former Rep. Virgil Goode hands in 20,000 signatures to make Virginia presidential ballot

http://washingtonexaminer.com ^ | August 23, 2012 | Steve Contorno

[bert]

Goode is pretending to be a candidate so the misguided can pretend to vote

[freedomfiter2]

You really need to put down that crack pipe. There is no way in Hell that Romney is as bad as 0bama.

You’re right. He’s only half as much of a big government kind of guy. It would have taken him twice as long to accomplish what Obama did.

[GlockThe Vote]

Obama = 100% proven disaster and traitor

Romney = 50% - 100% chance of being a disaster.

Easy choice to make when the current ship is sinking. Time to change the captain at the helm.

[Sirius Lee]

Again - those who failed to unify behind someone to beat Mittens have no basis to complain whatsoever.

I have a candidate. You obamney voters are the ones complaining because Conservatives are voting for a Conservative rather than obamney.

BTW - I'm not voting for mitt because he's not "pure". I'm not voting for him because he's not even close to being Conservative. He's not even a Republican even by Olympia Snowe standards. He's a flat out liberal. I'm not going to vote for someone who is to the left of Bill Clinton. Deal with it.

[GlockThe Vote]

Did you get your 2012 sticker yet?

[GlockThe Vote]

So you think you are more pure than us who will vote for r&R while you enable and assist an even GREATER evil of having Obama for four more years?

[mkjessup]

You really need to put down that crack pipe. There is no way in Hell that Romney is as bad as 0bama.
You’re right. He’s only half as much of a big government kind of guy. It would have taken him twice as long to accomplish what Obama did.

The most important task before us is to defeat 0bama. Only a fool, an idiot or a stealth-0bama supporter would argue otherwise. Do I like Romney? Hell NO I don't like him! But as our esteemed Founder stated last week, we'll deal with the RINOs later, for now we have to get that Marxist out of the White House.

Roll back your calendar to a hypothetical day in say, 1964 and let us presume that instead of Barry Goldwater, the GOP had nominated Nelson Rockefeller. And just to make the contrast a bit more chilling, let us say that the 'Rat candidate that year was not LBJ but someone like Eugene McCarthy, who would you vote for?

Ponder that. As Donald Rumsfeld said "you got to war with the army (or the candidate) you got, not the army you wish you had".

[Sirius Lee]

0bama-Biden thank you for your support.

LOL! You can always tell when a liberal loses the argument. Liberals can't so it might take up to a week for you to realize what just transpired, but it just happened.

[GlockThe Vote]

Your actions aid and assist obama - A COMMUNIST -for four more years.

You are not fooling anyone.

[freedomfiter2]

There is no doubt that Romney is better than Obama and one of the two will be elected. The problem is that ever since 1984 we have always had to choose between two new world order candidates. At some point we have to break the cycle and with Romney, we’ll have to wait 8 more years to even get another chance.

The other issue is that Congressional Republicans can be counted on to oppose a Democrat President at least some of the time. Most GOP Congressmen will not oppose a GOP President. The cumulative effect is that more damage is done by moderate Republican Presidents.

[JPII Be Not Afraid]

I would rather be called a liberal with Romney as president than a conservative with Obama as president.

[mkjessup]

LOL! You can always tell when a liberal loses the argument. Liberals can't so it might take up to a week for you to realize what just transpired, but it just happened.

I've got a little more time in on this forum as compared to you n00b, so I know more about dealing with liberals (LIKE YOU) then you think.

To paraphrase George W. Bush, "you are either with us, or you are with the 0bamunists."

[JPII Be Not Afraid]

"The other issue is that Congressional Republicans can be counted on to oppose a Democrat President at least some of the time. Most GOP Congressmen will not oppose a GOP President. The cumulative effect is that more damage is done by moderate Republican Presidents."

That logic works if you have a president who actually follows the constitution. When you have a dictator who does what he wants no Congress will stop him. That's the point. Where you believe the constitution saves us with another 4 years of Obama, we ABO's believe there will not be any stopping him once he is re-elected. I guess that's our difference. We have proof of Obama's coming dictatorship. Like Romney or not, he followed the law, which Obama doesn't.

[mkjessup]

The problem is that ever since 1984 we have always had to choose between two new world order candidates. At some point we have to break the cycle and with Romney, we’ll have to wait 8 more years to even get another chance.

1984?!? I know you are not suggesting that voting for the re-election of Ronald Reagan was voting for the NWO?

I'm no fan of Poppy Bush, Bob Dole, John McCain OR Mitt Romney. But this election is different in that our survival as a Nation may well depend on whether or not our 'domestic enemy' (0bama) gets another 4 years to continue wrecking America. Nobody will argue (least of all me) that we all wish we had a more conservative candidate on the GOP ticket, however this November 6th isn't just another primary, this is the BIG GAME, this is do-or-die time, and I will vote for the ticket that has the only chance of defeating 0bama, and that is Romney & Ryan.

[Sirius Lee]

So you think you are more pure than us who will vote for r&R while you enable and assist an even GREATER evil of having Obama for four more years?

You seem to keep falling into the same mental trap, so let me help you out. Now Santorum and Gingrich weren't "pure" candidates, but they were recognizably Republican and Conservative on balance. A Conservative could vote for either despite some issues of disagreement. mitt is not and has never been either - not even close. As a matter of fact he's still out there on the campaign trail defending the abomination known as Romneycare for God's sake. He's a liberal. If that's what you believe in, go for it, but he's not my cup o' tea.

I don't know why you're worried about Goode. It's good to have an actual Conservative like Goode in the race since mitt is splitting the liberal vote. Vote with your fellow travelers.

I'm voting Conservative.

[Charles Henrickson]

Goode and his running mate, Pennsylvania native James Clymer. . . .

So it's the Goode-Clymer ticket. Appropriate.

[Sirius Lee]

To paraphrase George W. Bush,

LOL! Now you're reduced to stealing thoughts from RINOs? Just quit while you're a behind.

I've got a little more time in on this forum as compared to you n00b,

Makes your abandonment of Conservatism all the more tragic. I'll take a young Conservative over an old CINO any day.

[JRandomFreeper]

The only marketing i need is that lethal threat in the WH to our survival

Every single election, the GOP trots out that fear thing. It's old. I remember when Clinton was going to put us all in FEMA camps if he won re-election. We're still here.

I expect we'll survive, regardless of which liberal wins.

/johnny

[Sirius Lee]

I would rather be called a liberal

I think the GOPe has already pretty much established that.

[newnhdad]

The ABRs remind me of that Soviet sub commander in “The Hunt for Red October”.. They get too cute and get killed by their own torpedo.. “you arrogant ass, you killed us”..