Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP Akin Problem Is Worse than They Think
Dianawest.net ^ | 8/24/2012 | Diana West

Posted on 08/25/2012 12:09:20 PM PDT by kreitzer

Prediction: If the GOP establishment doesn’t follow Republican Rep. Todd Akin’s example with a big, fat apology – to Akin – the whole party goes down in flames come November.

I don’t mean every Republican will lose, but there is great political peril in not sealing the hole in Republican armor that has opened in Missouri and instead permitting it to remain a Democratic pressure point. Further, “for the good of the country” (the mantra accompanying the party-wide chorus of pleas to Akin to drop out of his U.S. Senate race), Republicans must resume funding Akin’s viable campaign ASAP, after cutting it off in a mad fit of political pique. Finally, every one of them – the party standard-bearer, party bosses, congressional delegations, allied pundits – should come together for a group smack on the head, as in, “What were we thinking?”

I can’t recall anything in public life more widely craven and uncalled for than the open panic and bullying set off across the Republican Party by the first replay of Akin’s perplexingly ignorant interview comments on rape and pregnancy. The veteran conservative lawmaker, former engineer, former businessman and grandfather of eight recanted these remarks. He apologized for them.

But as the left began to bay for blood over a Republican and, by preposterous extension, Republican Party it hopes to smear as “anti-woman,” Republicans across the board, incredibly, joined in. Rather than jouncing Democrats back into some semblance of decent behavior with a firm, party-wide reality check – comparing a dumb comment about rape from one among their ranks with, say, accusations of actual rape against Democrats’ two-term hero, Bill Clinton – Republicans obligingly cut off their own noses and handed them to their political opponents.

The headline in the New York Times this week said it all: “GOP is pressing candidate to quit over rape remark.” Funny how we never, ever saw anything similar in the 1990s, when bombshells about Bill Clinton’s serial sexual harassment and assault of women were a common occurrence. Something like: “Dems pressing president to quit over rape.”

Didn’t happen. In fact, far from “pressuring” the former president into a quiet post-presidency retirement, the Democrats are spotlighting the overexposed sexual reprobate with a center-stage role at their upcoming convention. There, Clinton will officially re-nominate Barack Obama for president.

What else can we expect from the party that still lionizes Ted Kennedy, the late Massachusetts politician who notoriously left a young female campaign worker to drown in a sinking car rather than get help? Just as serial sexual improprieties perpetrated by Bill Clinton don’t count in Democrat-land as “anti-woman,” neither does Kennedy’s unconscionable behavior at Chappaquiddick. Both men not only remained in office, they remain the Democrats’ ideal.

A muddled, recanted remark about reproductive biology, however, puts a Republican one or two steps away from Hitler. He must be shunned by “decent” society, his whole career destroyed, the primary votes he won nullified, to expiate his “sin.”

Worst of all is the Republican Party’s unified acquiescence to this illogical, unjust and amoral equivalence. In fact, without the GOP’s lockstep, take-me-to-your-leader obedience to the Democrats’ rigged rules, the pitch of this controversy would have died down already. Without the Republicans’ vigorous enforcement of the left’s double standards, Akin would probably still be facing favorable odds of winning the Missouri Senate seat.

But no, which is what deeply concerns me. Indulging ginned-up, hack hysterics is not the behavior of a leader or a winner. Worse, accommodating unjust attacks on a solid citizen in the name of practicality or the “greater good” is a very dangerous precedent, as totalitarian history tells us. That’s why the GOP needs to rethink Missouri and make amends with Akin before “moving on.” Otherwise, I fear that in its vital quest to prevent Barack Obama from winning a second term, it won’t be moving anywhere.

---


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: akin; akin4mccaskill; akin4obama; naralgop; taitorakin; teaparty; thestupidparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-243 next last
To: Uncle Chip
Unfortunately sheeple want to talk about Huckabee's character and not what he said. They won't touch the subject of his word's veracity with a ten foot pole.

On a related note; Akin can't fight McCaskill or reshape his image if the GOP continues to deny him funds and threaten those who help him. I'm not so sure now that the GOP-E wanted McCaskill to lose her seat in the first place. Is she a reliable cross-over vote for RINOs like McLame?

81 posted on 08/25/2012 1:51:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

>>The fact that the GOP chose to “legitimize” the left’s findings on the matter is absolutely reprehensible.<<

I tend to agree, although it’s helpful to remember that Scott Brown of Massachusetts was the first on what quickly became a bandwagon. Brown, defending his seat in liberal Massachusetts, had some justification for disassociating himself from Akin’s comment quickly.

The rest of the GOP-e, not so much, and Senator Brown was probably surprised himself at how many joined him, and so rapidly too. Might have even helped him in his race? (lemons, lemonade, always remember that)


82 posted on 08/25/2012 1:52:26 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

So, everyone raise your hand if you’re voting for McCaskill over Akin when you get to the voting booth.

anyone?


83 posted on 08/25/2012 2:03:48 PM PDT by Big Giant Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sporke
Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still evil.

That is so damn wrong. That thinking is why we have King Obama. Life is made up of these choices but most of us grow up and realize that if we want to live in this element we have to make sure we select the lesser. Evil is a crock of shit in this perfect life and sometimes we have to be adult enough to accept it and make it better with what we have.

84 posted on 08/25/2012 2:04:36 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Akin hurts the pro life movement.

His ill informed epically stupid comment would disqualify him to serve on a jury, much less the Senate.

All he had to say was I’m against abortion in all cases, because in every case the child is innocent.

Instead he decided to elaborate in a manner that hurts the pro-life movement today by giving planned parenthood propaganda that demonstrates our side can’t empathize with women... all while denying that thousands of women have heroically given birth to children conceived in rapes.

He’s stupid... If he cared about the pro life movement more than himself he would drop out.


85 posted on 08/25/2012 2:05:34 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Is she a reliable cross-over vote for RINOs like McLame?

There was a move in Missouri by the retired and never heard from until election time Senator John Danforth et al to slip their favored beholden to them candidate into the Senate race as late as March of this year despite the money and time that all the other three had spent on the campaign. Steelman, Akin, and Brunner were unacceptable to him and them.

And now we have this hystrionic contrivance.

It is highly possible that no matter who would have won the primary, this would be happening to them as well.

86 posted on 08/25/2012 2:11:32 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Not yet, but hopeful.

If there is no write-in, I will vote for Akin under duress. But I have lost respect for the man because I don’t think he has the nation’s best interest at heart.

I know Missouri can do better.


87 posted on 08/25/2012 2:12:53 PM PDT by chronicles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

Yea makes sense, Senator Brown the faux tea party candidate, a wolf draped in tea bags to get elected.

A liberal in reality, perfect fit for the new Gop-e


88 posted on 08/25/2012 2:14:15 PM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99
All he had to say was I’m against abortion in all cases, because in every case the child is innocent.

At best,his response was a classic case of too smart by half.

89 posted on 08/25/2012 2:23:19 PM PDT by pilipo (GOP=Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Thank you.
Well stated.


90 posted on 08/25/2012 2:23:24 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

As I said before, call me what you want.

I’m not playing your game.


91 posted on 08/25/2012 2:23:58 PM PDT by chronicles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Brown...”A liberal in reality, perfect fit for the new Gop-e”

Let’s not look the gift horse too closely in the mouth. He’s a perfect fit for the GOP-Massachusetts, and that might be the only way we hold the seat.

Politics, strange bedfellows, all of that...


92 posted on 08/25/2012 2:24:07 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: chronicles
It is my choice to make. The seat is probably lost anyway if Akin does not withdraw.

It will only be lost if folks don't vote for him, whatever the issues.

93 posted on 08/25/2012 2:29:27 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: chronicles

In Missouri, a write-in candidate has until 2 Fridays before the election (Oct.26) to file. They seldom win anywhere...IMO it is too late for such an effort to be mounted anyway. Other than as a “protest vote.”


94 posted on 08/25/2012 2:38:13 PM PDT by donozark (PLEASE SEE: WWW.AKIN.ORG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I'm surprised to see how many so-called conservatives behave like true liberals by engaging in attribution games, and consider anyone who disagree with them a sheep who couldn't think with their own brain. Calls for withdrawal come from every corner of the Republican Party, from liberal corner like Brown and Romney, to conservative figures like Palin, West, and Walker. It is not liberal media who calls for his withdrawal, rather, the conservative media: Limbaugh, Hannity, etc. If anything, it is liberal media (and Akin's early supporter, McCaskill) who want him to stay until Sep 25. Whenever someone points this out, the reaction they got from Akin supporters usually a litany of things those people did (Brown did this, Palin did that, etc, so they're not to be trusted).

Akin shifted the election discourse from the economy into the definition of rape. I understand that some Akin supporters are more than happy to see the election is about abortion, rape, etc., rather than the economy, but that's not what the voters' most immediate priority now.

95 posted on 08/25/2012 2:42:50 PM PDT by paudio (Post-racial society: When we can legitimately hire and fire a Black man without feeling guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: andyk
I have been really surprised at how quickly a large number of FReepers turned on Akin, a true pro life candidate who has genuine concern for the unborn.i> Much the same was done to Santorum, who said "he had taken one for the team" on some votes in the Senate. But Newton Gingrich was given a "free pass" on the holes in his record. People here have been unforgiving of human error, but if it was a Democrat, the MO people would flock to back him.
96 posted on 08/25/2012 2:45:38 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people have again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paudio

the economy, but that’s not what the voters’ most immediate priority now.

Howard Baker said practically these same words in 1981, and we got Sandra Day O’Connor a few months later.


97 posted on 08/25/2012 2:47:42 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people have again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Ma won in 2006 over Jim Talent by less than 50K votes. Every vote counts. Over 2 million voted in that election and it was a VERY bad year for Bush. Fallujah (Third), IEDs. Exploding muslims. Stem Cell issue in MO (M.J. Fox) and J. Talent just lost his wind before election night.

Again people, we're trying to win an election here. Not climbing Hill 881s...

98 posted on 08/25/2012 2:54:48 PM PDT by donozark (PLEASE SEE: WWW.AKIN.ORG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Calls for withdrawal come from every corner of the Republican Party, from liberal corner like Brown and Romney, to conservative figures like Palin, West, and Walker. It is not liberal media who calls for his withdrawal, rather, the conservative media: Limbaugh, Hannity, etc.

That's a very good description of herd mentality in action. Regardless of their individual views they follow each other in unthinking lockstep.

99 posted on 08/25/2012 2:57:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Thanks for the information.

I am aware that it might be a losing proposition...I will re-evaluate the situation on 26th of October.

It is possible that Sarah Palin may come up with a write-in candidate. I value her judgement.

I appreciate your courtesy.


100 posted on 08/25/2012 2:59:34 PM PDT by chronicles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson