Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Natural Gas for Cars (The key to ending OPEC’s control over the U.S. transportation industry)
National Review ^ | 08/26/2012 | T. Boone Pickens & R. James Woolsey

Posted on 08/27/2012 4:21:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2012 4:21:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“(The key to ending OPEC’s control over the U.S. transportation industry)” How about DRILL BABY DRILL and America could end OPEC’s control over the U.S. within five (5) years!

As long as there is a Muslim in the WH, OPEC will continue to control the U.S. transportation industry with the Unions controlling the TSA stopping and searching Americans and their vehicles.

Americans will never be free of Middle East oil until Obama is out of the WH period. Natural gas, crude oil, Nuclear power, and any other form of natural power that Americans can invent or develop without government control, and NAZI boots on the neck of refineries and oil pipelines will end OPEC’s control over the US!

2 posted on 08/27/2012 4:29:55 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (We are kicking Ass in Afghanistan, soon we will be home to kick some more Asses in Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have seen T Boone on Cavuto make the case that we could become independent pretty much by fueling the heavy commercial fleet with natural gas.

He is basically a good ol’ boy, but a smart good ol’ boy. T Boone has spent a good bit of time as an elder good ol’ boy studying the problem. Being old and free from the restraints of those not retired frees one’s mind to think beyond the limits of day to day. He has done just that.

The problem now boils down to devising and implementing the transistion.


3 posted on 08/27/2012 4:33:17 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let me know when they develop the impact-proof fuel system first.


4 posted on 08/27/2012 4:33:26 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Seriously? No. We already tried natural gas as a widespread fuel back in the 70s and again in the 2000s (though the second time it was used as a fleet-only fuel). It doesn’t work out at all the way this writer thinks, and there were many homeowners who could tell you about how bad an idea it was when their neighbor’s natural gas compressor for his car went on fire/exploded/leaked and blew up half the block back in the 70s.


5 posted on 08/27/2012 4:35:52 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BUMP


6 posted on 08/27/2012 4:35:52 AM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Boon Pickens wants to recoup the money he lost on his wind farms by driving up the price of his natural gas holdings. We have enough oil to fill all our domestic needs and to become an exporter. We just need to drill it.


7 posted on 08/27/2012 4:39:17 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Used all the time in racing cars and aircraft, they are called fuel cells. Added with the current technology on the road for collision avoidance, and we have what you desire.


8 posted on 08/27/2012 4:39:56 AM PDT by mazda77 ("Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" By: Hilmar von Campe. Everybody should read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

It should also be pointed out that natural gas is only this cheap because demand for it is relatively low. Throw the vehicle population of the US in there and watch prices skyrocket. Remember, the natural gas vehicles would then be competing with powerplants for the natural gas that’s out there. Then you can have expensive vehicle fuel and ridiculous electric bills at the same time.


9 posted on 08/27/2012 4:39:56 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paratrooper82
I agree. There is a potential energy revolution coming that could take out nation to new, greater heights. The only thing that will stop or slow it is those that want to kill our nation.

The natural gas potential with the fracking of our shale deposits is hugh - and that's not including new oil production, coal, and nuclear. Look at what is going on in North Dakota and apply it to other shale trend formations. At least fifty good years of solid production if not 159 years in states that include Ohio.

10 posted on 08/27/2012 4:41:01 AM PDT by 103198
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So who's going to line up to buy the new GM "Combustible"?

* crickets chirping *

Maybe if Toyota or Honda jump on board. Anything non-union's a candidate.

11 posted on 08/27/2012 4:42:23 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Those are intended to contain liquid fuels, not gaseous ones under pressure. If you want an impact-proof gas cylinder, you will find they weigh more than the engine of the car does, empty.

To give you some idea of how long this has been promoted, watch this very early 80s video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irvktfQvu4M

Those lightweight tanks? Yeah, turned out they delaminated and ruptured after a while, which is why they never went anywhere in the marketplace.

For a given volume tank, you will get far less range on natural gas, as well.


12 posted on 08/27/2012 4:44:17 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

With capturing all of it instead of burning it off will also raise production and lower the cost. So why is it that your glass is twice the size it has to be? Dealing with a problem that is either a glass half full or half empty is not the way one should be looking at efficiency when it comes to dealing with engineering problems.


13 posted on 08/27/2012 4:44:34 AM PDT by mazda77 ("Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" By: Hilmar von Campe. Everybody should read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Honda already sells a $25K natural gas powered Civic variant, the Civic GX.

Nobody except government agencies buys them.


14 posted on 08/27/2012 4:45:17 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paratrooper82
...How about DRILL BABY DRILL...

Agree! My question is Why are we putting our oil on the OPEC commodities board and purchasing it back? This makes no sense to me.
15 posted on 08/27/2012 4:45:41 AM PDT by vet7279
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

NatGas folks have been dreaming of transportation demand for 30 years at least. And, with the 100% backing of enviro’s - at least throughout the 90’s and the early aughts. You’re right - the explosion risk is too scary and until that’s solved Boone should save his articles and get in the lab.


16 posted on 08/27/2012 4:47:13 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

People have been trying to attack these “engineering problems” with NGVs for at least the past fifty years. Nobody’s solved them all and they’re still not very good.

Capturing it all isn’t even an option with the infrastructure we have now. We would need literally an order of magnitude more pipelines, etc., to even begin to feed the vehicle fleet.


17 posted on 08/27/2012 4:47:13 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Perhaps some will now understand why the environmental movement is trying to kill natural gas now.

Once natural gas becomes used for transportation fuel, it will be insane to reverse course and pursue subsidized electric, ethanol or algae.

Clean, domestic natural gas, produced by American workers earning above-average wages will become part of our culture in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York.

Turning the traditionally blue states of Pennsylvania and New York into energy proucers will also change the politics of those states......something liberals cannot allow.


18 posted on 08/27/2012 4:50:52 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Power plants would then revert to coal and nuclear fuel. The reason for coal and nuclear not being used is political, not economic or scientific


19 posted on 08/27/2012 4:50:52 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Natural Gas for Cars (The key to ending OPEC’s control over the U.S. transportation industry)

Geez, what dopey crap. Sounds as though it's written by someone heavily invested in natural gas. More than half of U.S. petroleum does not come from OPEC nations. 60% of world petroleum is non-OPEC petroleum. And since the beginning of oil production (1859), the world has used about 1 trillion barrels. The United States, in oil shale alone, has about 2 trillion barrels. This doesn't include what is out there on the continental shelf or in Alaska and other places. North America (U.S., Canada, and Mexico) dwarfs the petroleum reserves of the rest of the world.
20 posted on 08/27/2012 4:51:53 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson