Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rules to double U.S. fuel economy to 54.5 mpg by 2024
http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/28/autos/fuel-economy-rules/index.html?iid=HP_LN&hpt=hp_t3 ^

Posted on 08/28/2012 8:15:42 PM PDT by TigerClaws

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The Obama administration finalized new fuel economy rules Tuesday that within 12 years will almost double today's standard for cars and light trucks to 54.5 miles per gallon. The rules, which have been in the works for several years, will add thousands of dollars to the cost of new cars. But in the long run, regulators say, drivers will spend less on gas, outweighing the additional cost at the dealership. They say the rules will also help reduce the nation's oil imports from OPEC by about half.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cafe; fuel; sourcetitlenoturl; standards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
More Chevy Volts?
1 posted on 08/28/2012 8:15:44 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

54.5 CAFE is about 26mpg EPA for a light truck and 44mpg EPA for a compact car. In between for different sized cars.

CAFE numbers are different than the EPA numbers.


2 posted on 08/28/2012 8:18:18 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

The rules, which have been in the works for several years, will add thousands of dollars to the cost of new cars.....>>

Well that oughtta get this sluggish economy rolling...


3 posted on 08/28/2012 8:20:33 PM PDT by JPJones (Frodo Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

http://therealrevo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flintstone-mobile1.jpg


4 posted on 08/28/2012 8:21:06 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
I had a 62 VW bug back in the 60’s that got 30 mpg. Sixty years later the technology is only able to go to 44 mpg..kinda sad really
5 posted on 08/28/2012 8:23:15 PM PDT by montanajoe (Blame Flame Shame or Beg I won't vote for R/R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

The BS is, of course, that the Dems will have gas at $20.00/gallon by then. So, your 2024 model 50K strippo truck WILL be economical, at that price. How convenient.

Romney’s website claims that every single regulation will be tested against how it will hurt the economy and the taxpayer.

We shall see. Clearly, these types of rules need to be among the first casualties.


6 posted on 08/28/2012 8:24:07 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I just figured out if I want my new Dodge Challenger to come in a 300+ hp V6 or a Hemi.

If I can get it for the right number, Hemi. Obummer can bite me.


7 posted on 08/28/2012 8:24:21 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

The new CAFE standards passed into law has one critical flaw — it ignores physics.

We’ll be driving around in smaller and lighter vehicles, which statistically equates to increased death in the event of an accident.

No thanks, I’ll keep my wife and kids rolling in my HUMMER for as along as I can!

And I pray no SMART car accidents come my way!


8 posted on 08/28/2012 8:24:50 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

According to Government Motors and EeeeeeePA, the Volt does better than that now.

http://www.plugincars.com/epa-rates-chevy-volt-93-mpg-or-60-mpg-or-35-mpg-depending-106498.html
“General Motors announced the Chevy Volt will carry a rating of 93 mpg while running purely on electricity, and 37 mpg in so-called “charge-sustaining” mode.”

“While the EPA tries to pin 60 mpg as a single composite number for the Volt’s efficiency, ... “

“And with the optional Volt belly-mount mower attachment ... “


9 posted on 08/28/2012 8:25:19 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

This is akin to legislating that Pi = 3

CAFE needs to die.


10 posted on 08/28/2012 8:28:10 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Rules to double U.S. fuel economy to 54.5 mpg by 2024

Gee, if "rules" can double fuel economy, why not make it 500 mpg?

Yes we can!

11 posted on 08/28/2012 8:29:02 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

There’s only so much energy you can squeeze out of an energy source. There comes a point when you can’t squeeze a lemon any more.


12 posted on 08/28/2012 8:32:06 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“This is akin to legislating that Pi = 3”

BINGO! The effect of these rules will be to effectively outlaw new cars. We’ll all be putting around in fifty year old derelicts like they do in Cuba.


13 posted on 08/28/2012 8:36:10 PM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
The rules, which have been in the works for several years, will add thousands of dollars to the cost of new cars. But in the long run, regulators say, drivers will spend less on gas, outweighing the additional cost at the dealership.

And then will come the vehicle miles traveled tax. Better milage means less tax revenue from gasoline sales. Driver will not see a reduction in the cost of owning an automobile.

14 posted on 08/28/2012 8:36:32 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Gee, if "rules" can double fuel economy, why not make it 500 mpg?

Same with that unreasonably stubborn global warming, it is not following the EPA "rules."

Communist agenda donks declare the rules are a tax...

.

15 posted on 08/28/2012 8:36:35 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

A billboard along Rt. 30 in York, PA states, “YOU CAN’T SOLVE THE ENERGY CRISIS WITH SOLAR BICYCLES!” I agree.


16 posted on 08/28/2012 8:36:42 PM PDT by Tucker39 ( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
You just need a very light car.

But seriously, this kind of thing is a good example of the death by 1000 cuts that is killing or country. 4 more years of Obama, and we'll bleed out..

17 posted on 08/28/2012 8:37:42 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

“General Motors announced the Chevy Volt will carry a rating of 93 mpg while running purely on electricity...”
Electricity comes in gallons now?


18 posted on 08/28/2012 8:42:46 PM PDT by running_dog_lackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Direct-injection turbo-Diesel sedans already meet this requirement.

Then why is the EPA making it so difficult to produce these vehicles?


19 posted on 08/28/2012 8:46:16 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
“There’s only so much energy you can squeeze out of an energy source”

I agree but what really bugs me is our dependence on middle east oil is effectively a huge tax on the American consumer that is being used to fund the Islamist war against this country.

We needed to end our dependence on middle east oil in the 70’s through energy self sufficiency and innovation

20 posted on 08/28/2012 8:46:20 PM PDT by montanajoe (Blame Flame Shame or Beg I won't vote for R/R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson