Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Netanyahu Goes Nuclear on Obama
.breitbart.com ^ | 9/2/12 | Awr Hawkins

Posted on 09/02/2012 9:37:59 AM PDT by Justaham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: 353FMG

I disagree. Obama needs to carry a certain amount of the Jewish vote, so if he doesn’t help or appears to actively hinder Israel, in the event Israel attacks Iran, Obama would lose a chunk of voters, which he can’t afford in a tight race.

As for the cry that you can’t change presidents during a war, Romney/Ryan/Republicans could easily counter that by saying something like, “Israel was forced to act militarily, because policies of Obama had failed to stop Iran from moving forward on their plans for nuclear weapons and the illimination of Israel.”


81 posted on 09/02/2012 4:37:25 PM PDT by ScubieNuc (When there is no justice in the laws, justice is left to the outlaws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
I disagree. Obama needs to carry a certain amount of the Jewish vote, so if he doesn't help or appears to actively hinder Israel, in the event Israel attacks Iran, Obama would lose a chunk of voters, which he can't afford in a tight race.

As for the cry that you can't change presidents during a war, Romney/Ryan/Republicans could easily counter that by saying something like, “Israel was forced to act militarily, because policies of Obama had failed to stop Iran from moving forward on their plans for nuclear weapons and the elimination of Israel.”

82 posted on 09/02/2012 4:37:50 PM PDT by ScubieNuc (When there is no justice in the laws, justice is left to the outlaws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No need to take them out, simply collapse the entrances and exits and repeat when necessary.If they can’t get in or out their facilities are basically useless.

I say this under the premise that any attack will likely start a war which will eventually require troops on the ground and if/when it comes to that, the ground troops can take care of the facilities.


83 posted on 09/02/2012 4:52:26 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Perhaps, but there comes a time when the puppet throws off its chains and proceeds down its own path, and Israel may be forced onto that path by the inaction of its supposed ally.


84 posted on 09/02/2012 4:56:14 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I disagree from the viewpoint that a unilateral course is always the last choice in modern times, and that’s not too difficult to understand.

So, if it comes down to it, they will have to go it alone, and that is much more difficult than having support from others.


85 posted on 09/02/2012 5:01:03 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You have trouble telling the difference between a nation that is not sovereign and one that is sovereign but trying to avoid as much trouble as possible for its people.


86 posted on 09/02/2012 6:39:34 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

Well a general war in the middle east will end badly for everyone, so I tend to agree with you. The USA has really messed up the entire region. But it is too late to switch sides so we are stuck with Israel, which is fine with me since I like Israel a lot more then I like Islamests.


87 posted on 09/02/2012 7:59:32 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Think about it. If Country A feels threatened by Country B, and its leadership calls on Country C to "do something about it," then Country A isn't really a sovereign nation at all -- but rather (perhaps) a stunted puppet of Country C.

Country A = Iran. Country B = Israel. Country C = USA.

Kinda works better.

88 posted on 09/02/2012 8:32:19 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: SUSSA
For the life of me I’ve not figured out why Netanyahu hasn’t tasked the Mossad with leaking the dirt they have

The question of the ages, one that I have pondered since the zero came upon the political scene.

91 posted on 09/03/2012 12:16:30 AM PDT by itsahoot (Write in Palin in 2012, That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jyro

We lost almost 100,000 KIA in WW3. It was NOT cold.


92 posted on 09/03/2012 10:34:59 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Jewbacca; KC_Lion; GOPJ
Unum correctly states:
A bunker-buster might not be able to take out their nuclear-enrichment facilities, but a nuke could.

E. Pluribus Unum, Jewbacca; GOP J, and KC Lion, I'd like to have your thoughts on my posts #27 and #29 from the article below if you have a moment please:

"John Bolton Confirms: Israel Is Alone"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2926110/posts?page=24

93 posted on 09/03/2012 4:18:40 PM PDT by Mr Apple ( http://www.israelnewsagency.com/iranisraelnuclearariel3890624.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple
In a Nuclear Exchange No one wins, which is why preventing the Iranians from having one is so crucial.

The Stuxnet virus is just one of many ways the Israeli's are trying to prevent this.

You also have to take into account the supply of the Iranian Nuclear site, if Israel does decide to strike it could cut the arteries or hit the facility in such a way the prevents anything from leaving/entering.

One does not need to destroy the facilities per say, simply prevent their use.

94 posted on 09/03/2012 4:27:56 PM PDT by KC_Lion ( Wherever I find myself standing, I forever stand with Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Well, I don’t know.

I do know Iran is on the bleeding edge of Israeli range, making an “all-in” conventional attack difficult.

I would suggest a long, drawn-out, many tiered attack (months of cruise missles) before a nuclear attack, although I, too, am afraid a nuke attack may be the only possible method because I suspect Obama would order interception of Israeli craft.


95 posted on 09/04/2012 11:46:12 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Sigh. Does Bibi not know that cockroaches can survive a nuclear blast?


96 posted on 09/04/2012 11:51:56 AM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
One does not need to destroy the facilities per say, simply prevent their use.

Excellent reply. Thank you.

97 posted on 09/04/2012 9:04:33 PM PDT by Mr Apple ( http://www.israelnewsagency.com/iranisraelnuclearariel3890624.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Your reply also very astute, thank you.


98 posted on 09/04/2012 9:07:02 PM PDT by Mr Apple ( http://www.israelnewsagency.com/iranisraelnuclearariel3890624.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

“Just hope that any war between Iran and Israel takes place AFTER the November elections or Obama will be re-elected for sure.”

I have said all along that Bibi hates Obama’s guts and knows that Israel will not survive if he is re-elected. He will do everything he can, at the right time, to make sure Obama loses the election. I have confidence in him!


99 posted on 09/04/2012 9:12:30 PM PDT by Batman11 (We came for the chicken sandwiches and a Sweet Tea Party broke out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson