Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats to adopt historic stance on marriage
San Antonio Express News ^ | 2 September 2012 | Joe Garofoli

Posted on 09/03/2012 9:02:52 PM PDT by Racehorse

Eight years after California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the push for legalizing same-sex marriage was “too much, too fast, too soon,” the Democratic Party will make history Tuesday when it is expected to be the first major party to endorse same-sex marriage in its platform.

While the plank packs no legal power, it marks a cultural milestone.

“Another important societal cue that things are shifting,” said Amy Simon, an Oakland pollster who is working for advocates who want to legalize gay marriage in Maine and Washington. “As people are working through their conflicting feelings on this, they're looking for cues and this is another one.”

The platform declaration could spark political blowback, and one of the nation's leading opponents of same-sex marriage already is trying to make it an issue in pivotal swing states that have passed laws codifying marriage as a union of one man and one woman.

“By doing this, the Democratic Party is basically telling voters in places like North Carolina and Florida that they're a bunch of bigots,” said consultant Frank Schubert, the strategist behind California's Proposition 8 and similar campaigns to bar gay unions in four states where marriage is on the ballot in November.

The National Organization for Marriage began airing radio ads last week in North Carolina, targeting religious African Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at mysanantonio.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012dncconvention; 2012dncplatform; democrats; gaymarriage; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; lavendermafia; marriage; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: what's up; Psalm 144
It is true that their gay marriage plank flies in the face of every single referendum that has been held up to now. Obviously the people don't want this.

Of course not -- this is all the doing of a very small, supremely selfish and evil little grievance-group determined to "push it 'til it breaks" in the belief that it'll never break.

Gays have tons of money, Obama needs tons of money. This is a straight-up tradeoff, money for a perverted platform. The movement gays are relying on their moles in Media -- no telling what the proportion of homosexuals in media is these days, but it's no doubt high enough to have set Fred Friendly's head spinning back in the day -- to bash their marks, us, into submission.

41 posted on 09/04/2012 1:33:58 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
Eight years after California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the push for legalizing same-sex marriage was “too much, too fast, too soon,” the Democratic Party will make history Tuesday when it is expected to be the first major party to endorse same-sex marriage in its platform.

This action is consistent with the premise that leftists, liberals, and Democrats have disordered minds. It is also consistent with the foundational thesis that men and women are 100% interchangeable. That is also what feminism is all about. That is what same sex marriage is all about.

We are experiencing biblical times.

42 posted on 09/04/2012 2:29:45 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

““By doing this, the Democratic Party is basically telling voters in places like North Carolina and Florida that they’re a bunch of bigots,” said consultant Frank Schubert”

Right, not exactly a smart move...


43 posted on 09/04/2012 3:52:52 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

It’s so historic, North Carolinians rejected it.


44 posted on 09/04/2012 4:08:52 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Look at all the dictionaries of law foe the last 800 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.
Look at all the ecclesiastical writings of the last 1000 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.
Look at the samples of the best poetry and prose for the last 2000 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.

So call it whatever they want. Call it “queerage”. Call it whatever.

But trying to change language will never change whether or not it is “a social norm”.
And it will never be a social norm because it is not a biological, God given, scientific norm.

So much of the homosexual agenda makes me think that they are actually deep;y ashamed by their behavior.


45 posted on 09/04/2012 4:14:12 AM PDT by djf (The barbarian hordes will ALWAYS outnumber the clean-shaven. And they vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Not really history. For much of the 6000 years of recored human history homosexuality was condoned by most culutures, ie greeks, romans, babylonians, persians, egyptians... It was Jews in the ancient world who condemned it (one reason they were hated so much) and then Christians. All we are doing is going back 2000 years when we accept this behavior.


46 posted on 09/04/2012 4:45:13 AM PDT by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

47 posted on 09/04/2012 4:47:56 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I don’t think their “throwing the election,” which would imply willful disregard. They actually, stupidly think that the majority of people in the country are in favor of trashing marriage.

The DemocRat Party is simply lobotomized.


48 posted on 09/04/2012 5:23:21 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

It’ll be nothing short of sin to vote for that platform and any of those candidates that endorse it!

HF


49 posted on 09/04/2012 6:30:14 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

The war on Christian values continues. They are not “throwing” the election they are waging total war on Judeo/Christian values. And they might just win, given the success of the Marxist indoctrination centers (public schools) in this country.


50 posted on 09/04/2012 6:38:10 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
The Left dares not let the meme of their upcoming defeat be borne on Soetero's anti-capitalism or union-friendly cronyism.

As they go down in flames, they feel they need to keep their ragtag coalition solid enough to fight with a relatively untainted communist banner in subsequent elections.

Don't let the Log Cabin Republicans persuade all the queers in their camp that this will have been about Barry's tax hikes for all us "rich" Americans , lack of effective job stimulation and fiscal-indebtedness nonsense, indenturing everyone's future!

So the Left buys their solidarity with their gays through this seppuku.

HF

51 posted on 09/04/2012 6:52:52 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
"Democrats to adopt ahistoric stance on marriage"

There. Fixed it.

52 posted on 09/04/2012 6:55:09 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (Ten years on FreeRepublic and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scbison
The Romans executed homosexuals in their military, homosexuals were not accepted by the general Roman population. Only in the decadent ruling class was homosexuality accepted, since speaking out against the ruling class was pretty much a death sentence.

Much (propaganda) has been made of our modern view of the ancients accepting homosexuality. However we ignore the context, the ancients did not believe woman to be the equal of man, women were viewed as being fit for child baring and little more, ergo, women were unworthy of a mans' love. Real love was between equals not the superior man and the inferior woman. But to them love did not equal sex. Sex was for man and woman, love was for man/man. A man could love another man and never have sex with him. At least that is my take on the ancient educated Greek view of the proper role of the sexes.

53 posted on 09/04/2012 7:00:31 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings

“Democrats to adopt ahistoric stance on marriage”

Exactly so - thank you for correcting that publicly.


54 posted on 09/04/2012 7:10:49 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

I don’t think it will matter to them, either. What’s sad is that the Dem’s keep minorities dependent (on welfare, etc.) and they either don’t see or don’t care.


55 posted on 09/04/2012 7:13:47 AM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
The hispanics I know do NOT want amnesty for illegals.

The legal immigrants and native Hispanics I know don't want amnesty for illegals either.

56 posted on 09/04/2012 8:20:15 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (RINO season is open. No limit. Make them extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
The majority of blacks don’t condone gay marriage, or queers, for that matter.

The demonicRat "elite" are betting that their plantation slaves will vote for Barry Soetoro 0dinga anyway.

It's a pretty safe bet.

57 posted on 09/04/2012 8:27:04 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Black men or women would gladly marry members of the opposite sex if obama sked them too.


58 posted on 09/04/2012 8:28:24 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

[[The Dem platform would place no limits at all on abortion, the most extreme position ever.]]

Not to mention the left is desperately tryign to make thsi a Godless country- whiny o leavbign out ‘endowed by oiur creator’ when citing hte constitution, and leavign out ‘in God we trust’ and ‘one nation uinder God’ etc etc etcv- Hell- whiny o has been lauded byt the atheist groups for ‘moving America forward’ just recently for his refusal to mention God

The left desperately want this country to become a homosexual Godless nation- We all know how well that turned out for some cities ion the past- but the left is too dimwhitted to learn from past mistakes- insisting God doesn’t view homosexuality as an ABOMINATION which He saida few times in His word- Apparently God’s own Word doesn’t even matter to the left who then turn around and insist they are ‘Christian’


59 posted on 09/04/2012 11:49:41 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
This is purely anecdotal but I have a large pocket of Aunts, Uncles, and cousins in Illinois who are every day Church goers and unfortunately union whores. On top of this they are racists as hell against minorities.. In their minds Obama has nurtured their unions and provided them all jobs. Needless to say they are proudly voting for Obama despite making hell for anyone who is homosexual, Hispanic, or black who attempts to live in their small little town in Illinois.
60 posted on 09/05/2012 10:27:18 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson