Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Why hasn't Obama released his August fundraising totals?
Crickets from the LSM ^ | 9/7/12 | Me

Posted on 09/07/2012 10:45:47 AM PDT by jimbo123

Interesting that Obama hasn't released his fundraising totals for the month of August. Must be a disaster.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailyrepublic.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fail; obamafail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2012 10:45:47 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Because they suck!


2 posted on 09/07/2012 10:46:35 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

He looked like he had just been given a ton of bad news right before his speech last night


3 posted on 09/07/2012 10:47:10 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum [of good]")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

4 posted on 09/07/2012 10:49:09 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
He looked like he had just been given a ton of bad news right before his speech last night

Was he dumped by Reggie Love, too?
5 posted on 09/07/2012 10:50:17 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Are they required to disclose this info? Now, I am curious.


6 posted on 09/07/2012 10:50:24 AM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The campaign hasnt had time to fudge the numbers yet


7 posted on 09/07/2012 10:51:07 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri
Are they required to disclose this info? Now, I am curious.

I think they have ten days to report to the FEC after the end of each month. Romney probably released his ASAP because they were good numbers. Obama will probably wait for the last day...

8 posted on 09/07/2012 10:53:43 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“He looked like he had just been given a ton of bad news right before his speech last night”

The jobs report?


9 posted on 09/07/2012 10:55:37 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The money is probably more telling than the polls.


10 posted on 09/07/2012 10:55:39 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

“”The campaign hasnt had time to fudge the numbers yet””

I’ll buy your explanation but maybe not for the same reason you may think that!!!

I don’t for a minute believe they are hard up for campaign donations. The same people who put him where he is today with their money are still around and still want to see the destruction of the country as much as he does. If anything - they need to HIDE their numbers!


11 posted on 09/07/2012 10:56:19 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Negative amount???


12 posted on 09/07/2012 10:56:43 AM PDT by DonkeyBonker (Oppose Senate Amendment S.A. 2575! I need more than 10 rounds in my magazine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Just a little contrarian opinion here. I would not be surprised if the whole “Romney is out-raising and out-spending us is false.” Why? Because it fits their narrative. Romney is only in it for the rich and Obama is the man of the people, the poor folks who just can’t find the money to donate because Romney stole it all.

Just a thought.


13 posted on 09/07/2012 10:58:26 AM PDT by newheart (At what point does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“Was he dumped by Reggie Love, too?”

Or perhaps Reggie said, “look, this is how it’s going to be from now on, or I go public -— now you get on your knees.”


14 posted on 09/07/2012 10:58:50 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I think he is waiting for the friday bad news dump


15 posted on 09/07/2012 10:59:10 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Actually most of the Wall $t money that went to Baraq in 08 is going to Romney this year.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/29/news/economy/romney-obama-wall-street/index.htm


16 posted on 09/07/2012 11:00:02 AM PDT by nascarnation (Defeat Baraq 2012. Deport Baraq 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Obama does not disclose


17 posted on 09/07/2012 11:00:56 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I do think they sense that Romney is not another McLame.


18 posted on 09/07/2012 11:02:25 AM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

Their strategy has always been to milk the low dollar donors with multiple appeals through September and to romance the big dollar donors after the convention. The low dollar donors won’t be able to do enough from now until November to make a difference other than “campaign debt retirement” and the big money (outside of Hollywood and the media) has gone to Romney. The truth is that reasonable people won’t give to candidates that hate them, which is why those CEO’s made a big deal out of deciding to “sit out” because they don’t want to piss off the regime by supporting the Republican, in case Obama wins.

Truth is, most of the big money is funneled to the unregulated superpacs who will do the lions-share of the ads from here on out.


19 posted on 09/07/2012 11:05:08 AM PDT by newnhdad (Where will you be during the Election Riots of 2012/2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I do think they sense that Romney is not another McLame.

McCain's problem was that he was more interested in being liked than actually winning. He let the media and the Obama campaign dictate the terms of the debate, and as he, a miltary man, should have know when you let the enemy choose the the time and place of the battle, you've probably already lost. Romney is much more ruthless, he will use every dirty trick in the book to win, even if it means he will be hated in the process. (Just ask Santorum, Gingrich, Bachmann, Cain. etc)

20 posted on 09/07/2012 11:13:25 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson