Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The State of the Akin-McCaskill Race (Akin out of money?)
National Review Online ^ | 09/07/12 | Ramesh Ponnuru

Posted on 09/07/2012 1:53:59 PM PDT by TonyInOhio

He’s in a money crunch:

Todd Akin’s TV ads are, reportedly, being yanked from stations across the state because his campaign isn’t paying the bills. KOMU-TV in Columbia says it received half of the payment for an ad buy, and when it didn’t get the other half, it cancelled the rest of the ads. The station says its confirmed that other stations from St. Louis to Kansas City have been put in the same position.

McCaskill, meanwhile, is running positive ads about how moderate she is. I imagine the tone of the race will change markedly if Akin stays in past the deadline for him to get out.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: akin; akin4mccaskill; akin4obama; backstabberakin; evangelicals; huckabee; mccaskill; not2late2getout; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-199 next last
To: ZULU

Why would the GOP support a one issue idiot who only won the primary because of the support he got from from the democrats?


101 posted on 09/07/2012 5:04:11 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Jim Talent. He’s deep in the Romney camp and can save us.


102 posted on 09/07/2012 5:06:25 PM PDT by gura (If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

How did you guess???


103 posted on 09/07/2012 5:06:46 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: detective
Candidates who have been outspent have won before.

But not ones who are total idiots. Especially ones who had to count on dems to win the Republican Primary.
104 posted on 09/07/2012 5:12:25 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Sarah Steelman is not nearly as "conservative" as she led many people (including Sarah Palin) to believe.

I'd be surprised if Todd drops out. I'd be infinitely-more-surprised if he chose Steelman to run in his place. He knows her, and her voting record, in Missouri; she is not a conservative.

105 posted on 09/07/2012 5:30:46 PM PDT by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: John D
Especially ones who had to count on dems to win the Republican Primary.

No, he didn't count on dems to win. Missouri has an open primary balloting system. Dems can pick up a Republican ballot and vote for who they think is the weakest candidate they're told to vote for. If you were a Missouri resident and saw the deceptive McCaskill ads she was sending out, you would know what I'm saying. That is only one of the ways the dems work to steal elections in Missouri. But, I still believe Akin will beat her come November. McCaskill is so despised by the way she gave Obama his Obamacare bill and sold her soul to him in so many more ways, she will lose. And no, Akin is not a total idiot. Obama is a total idiot and the greatest threat to this nation. All this circle firing squad by some FReepers needs to be cooled down. Party infighting will only bring defeat.

106 posted on 09/07/2012 5:35:33 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

LOL... you really believe there’s a difference between we and I in this case? Akin is used as Republican personified. As long as he’s still Republican candidate, the Dhims will always be able to generalize their attacks. And don’t try to blurr what he said about woman’s self mechanism against pregnancy with the party’s platform against abortion. It’s stretching. After all, Akin himself apologized for what he said, or at least for the way he said it. It means he acknowledged he should have said things differently.


107 posted on 09/07/2012 5:42:17 PM PDT by paudio (Post-racial society: When we can legitimately hire and fire a Black man without feeling guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

Whatever.


108 posted on 09/07/2012 5:42:57 PM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
What makes you think a RINO would take his place?

Well let's see. Why not try the first sentence of the post you just "read."

I think he knew fully who would do the "replacing": not the rank and file, but the GOP-e.

I thought that was clear enough as to 'what made me think a RINO would take his place.' Seeing as there is no time for a primary, one would rationally think the Party would simply name a replacement. It seems more than likely that the SOS in Missouri would buy it. Hence, it's up to the Party leadership as to the nominee. Hence my conclusion that it would be a RINO. Wasn't that obvious?

Is Sarah Steele a RINO?

Absolutely not. What makes you think she would be the replacement nominee?

I have suggested several times that he make a deal to withdraw if he could name his replacement. That would be a win-win.

I wanted that too. Anybody with a brain would. Nor is there any doubt that the topic cam up with Mr. Akin. He didn't do it. As the nominee, he has the power to stay in, but not to name his replacement.

But he won’t do that because, despite what he says, it is about him.

Akin had no power to make the deal we want. He would have had to go to the Party. If the GOP-e would rather lose than have a conservative nominee like Steelman win, then they'd have said "no dice" to such a deal as you propose. Akin would then have to weigh whether to let a RINO take his place and turn off the base, or take his chances that the people of Missouri would see through all this.

It may not be all about him.

109 posted on 09/07/2012 5:43:36 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: montag813

>> Amazed that there’s anyone left on FR to defend this moron. Easy Senate pickup down the drain. It is surreal.

Amazing there’s anyone on FR directly or indirectly promoting McCaskill.


110 posted on 09/07/2012 5:45:26 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

re: I wanted that too. Anybody with a brain would. Nor is there any doubt that the topic cam up with Mr. Akin. He didn’t do it. As the nominee, he has the power to stay in, but not to name his replacement.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Not having that power to name a replacement is true; but that doesn’t mean he can’t try to negotiate a deal with the Central Committee. As I’ve learned in the business world, you never make a deal until you make an offer or someone makes an offer to you. Either party could make that offer if they are serious about getting rid of McCasKILL.


111 posted on 09/07/2012 6:00:19 PM PDT by doug from upland (I don't like RINOs, but I love my country more than I hate Romney...Muslim marxist, get out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: detective

Where does he get the money? He already owes bills he cannot pay. Yes, many who have less money and been outspent have won. But he has negative money right now.


112 posted on 09/07/2012 6:03:04 PM PDT by doug from upland (I don't like RINOs, but I love my country more than I hate Romney...Muslim marxist, get out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
As I’ve learned in the business world, you never make a deal until you make an offer or someone makes an offer to you.

We do not know whether such an attempt was made. If one had, would you prefer that Mr. Akin air the fact that the Party would deny the second highest vote-getter? It would cause outright war between the factions at a time when it cannot be afforded. So I don't know what happened, but I do know that supporting Mr. Akin and sticking a thumb in the GOP-e's eye, at this point, would be a very good thing.

113 posted on 09/07/2012 6:26:23 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Then he needs money from SOMEBODY.


114 posted on 09/07/2012 8:07:36 PM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: John D

To control the vote in the Senate. Also, the majority party controls the Committees, sinking bills they don’t like and promoting those they want.

AND we would no longer need to bear the odious presence of that imbecile Harry Reid.


115 posted on 09/07/2012 8:10:08 PM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

GOP E pissed off because Akin did not vote for Bush’s Medicare D or the No Child Left Behind debacle. Read some new polls on a MO forum and one shows Akin ahead and the other which is a liberal poll has Claire one point up.
As for me...I support Akin 100%!


116 posted on 09/07/2012 8:30:16 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: super7man

God bless YOU. He is a good conservative man. More conservative than Romney or Bush. Akin is no fool..anyone and everyone can make a dumb mistake from time to time. I don’t see the gop turning their backs on Rove after the horrible comment he made about murdering Akin. I don’t see Rove being reprimanded.
Akin voted against Bush’s medicare D plan and the failed No Child Left Behind. Maybe Rove is still pissed about it.


117 posted on 09/07/2012 8:33:48 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Akin a rino? LOL that is not only a lie that is a damn lie.


118 posted on 09/07/2012 8:35:47 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ElectionInspector

KUDOS to you. It would take a total moron to vote for McCaskill who will do more damage no matter who is president over Akin who is one of the most conservative and Godly men in congress.
Rove is a fat jerk. Arrogant asshole.


119 posted on 09/07/2012 8:39:00 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

bump

Notice the GOPe cuts off the money, apparently, when he catches back up in the polls


120 posted on 09/07/2012 8:40:46 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson