Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Organic food benefits questioned in study
minnesota.publicradio.org ^ | September 4, 2012 | LAURAN NEERGAARD

Posted on 09/10/2012 12:45:18 AM PDT by neverdem

WASHINGTON (AP) — Patient after patient asked: Is eating organic food, which costs more, really better for me?

Unsure, Stanford University doctors dug through reams of research to find out -- and concluded there's little evidence that going organic is much healthier, citing only a few differences involving pesticides and antibiotics.

Eating organic fruits and vegetables can lower exposure to pesticides, including for children -- but the amount measured from conventionally grown produce was within safety limits, the researchers reported Monday.

Nor did the organic foods prove more nutritious...

(Excerpt) Read more at minnesota.publicradio.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: antitobaccoscam; followthemoney; food; health; organicfood; smokingiscool
Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?: A Systematic Review
1 posted on 09/10/2012 12:45:23 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Just more lies and propaganda from the media that helped elect the current resident of the White House.

From Natural News:

Busted! Co-author of Stanford study that bashed organics found to have deep ties to Big Tobacco’s anti-science propaganda

http://www.naturalnews.com/037108_Stanford_Ingram_Olkin_Big_Tobacco.html


2 posted on 09/10/2012 1:01:04 AM PDT by waus (FUBO UFCMF, Just in case I stuttered, FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Oh No! Big Organic’s no safer than conventional farming.
3 posted on 09/10/2012 1:28:18 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waus

A writer with a bias rejecting a researcher with “financial ties” and a bias to tabacco. Perhaps the statistician simply works for whomever hires him. Personally, minimal pestaveggies. Thankfully michele obama is pushing pestaveggies on the youngest and perhaps most at risk. Side note, ingredients in meats and fish support male & female hormones. A fully grown man converting to pestavegetarian is very different frim developing children and women of child bearing age. Btw... i am not so sure about the purity of “organic”. Its simply too expensive for me.


4 posted on 09/10/2012 2:14:22 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia. 2016 starts today! Walker, Issa, Rubio,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: waus

A writer with a bias rejecting a researcher with “financial ties” and a bias to tabacco. Perhaps the statistician simply works for whomever hires him. Personally, minimal pestaveggies. Thankfully michele obama is pushing pestaveggies on the youngest and perhaps most at risk. Side note, ingredients in meats and fish support male & female hormones. A fully grown man converting to pestavegetarian is very different frim developing children and women of child bearing age. Btw... i am not so sure about the purity of “organic”. Its simply too expensive for me.


5 posted on 09/10/2012 2:14:34 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia. 2016 starts today! Walker, Issa, Rubio,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: waus

LOL. Then every study sponsored by a government entity is biased because of its ties to Big Government!

Not thinking isn’t the same as thinking. If any entity is anti-science it is government. The nature of government is political. Science is about the pursuit of truth.


6 posted on 09/10/2012 2:51:44 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Organic is another racket of the Left. Borlaug and the Green Revolution saved lives and spared millions from misery. The Left hates that.

Primitivism at the hands of an elite group of masters is their goal. Death is their hallmark.


7 posted on 09/10/2012 2:53:29 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Stanford University doctors dug through reams of research to find out -- and concluded there's little evidence that going organic is much healthier."

Yet the bulk of the story was written to convince the reader to use organic foods, anyway. Oh, that's right, it's MPR, Minnesota Public Radio, using our money to propagandize us.

8 posted on 09/10/2012 4:07:30 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You have to admit that organic food is one of the best examples of excellent marketing and capitalism. High prices for a perceived value.


9 posted on 09/10/2012 4:52:25 AM PDT by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Her team did find a notable difference with antibiotic-resistant germs, a public health concern because they are harder to treat if they cause food poisoning.

Well then it is beneficial, despite what the rest of the article claims. News for these reporters: people don't like food posioning!

10 posted on 09/10/2012 4:56:01 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson