Romney is No Savior, and That's the Point

PJ Media ^ | September 12, 2012 | Sarah Hoyt

[muawiyah]

So far neither candidate has told the libyans or the egyptians to exterminate all these guys or we will turn their countries into rubble ~ anything short of that is just cowardice.

[muawiyah]

You do realize that we do not control all the state delegations ~ you have to have 26 of them to vote for a single candidate before january 20, 2013. That’s a lot more difficult than you imagine.

[dirtboy]

You do realize that we do not control all the state delegations ~ you have to have 26 of them to vote for a single candidate before january 20, 2013. That’s a lot more difficult than you imagine.

Try doing a simple exercise. Go check the number of Republican congresscritters versus Dem congresscritters by state. I did a quick tally and see that Dems only control sixteen state delegations and one tie - Minnesota.

So are there any other claims you wish to pull from your Hillary-sized arse?

[bmwcyle]

Was Ronald Reagan? Was Churchill? No but they did more for the world than any other men of their age.

[muawiyah]

you have to have a quorum of the states, which is 2/3 of them. That is 34 states ~ which means, ta da, by your own count you don't have a quorum unless you start making some deals!

However, this would be a quorum of the states AFTER this coming election.

Let's say this pud of an election that should have been so easy to win we'd have a Republican sweep of every contested seat ends up evenly divided ~ you could find getting a quorum VERY difficult ~ rather like the 1876 problem ~

[Boogieman]

"Is he exactly what we need? Probably not. Who is?"

President Arpaio?

[Boogieman]

[potlatch]

Thanks for the ping friend!
Not many months ago, Freepers were saying they would vote for a tin can over Obama. I believe Romney has led a decent life and will vote for him over the ‘disgrace in office’ we have now.