Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Republican party controlled by most extreme members
NBC News ^ | 9/12/12 | Andrew Rafferty

Posted on 09/12/2012 10:09:48 PM PDT by Libloather

Clinton: Republican party controlled by most extreme members
By NBC's Andrew Rafferty
4 hours ago

ORLANDO, Fla. – Former President Bill Clinton on Wednesday painted Republicans as a party controlled by its most extreme members, unwilling to compromise and too conservative for former GOP leaders like Richard Nixon and Dwight D. Eisenhower.

"Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower – Richard Nixon’s too liberal for these people. It’s amazing," Clinton told the 2,000 people packed into a hotel ballroom here. He said the most right-wing members of the GOP control the party's nominations and "political operations."

**SNIP**

"The American people have to believe me on this; I have traveled all over the world, not just when I was president, but since I left,” Clinton said. “I work everywhere. I'm telling you what works; what works is cooperation. What fails is constant conflict. You've got to vote for cooperation."

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; extreme; party; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Pontiac

Nixon believed in price controls, high taxes and tariffs.

Buddy boy, there is no kinship between Nixon and Romney.


21 posted on 09/13/2012 12:34:10 AM PDT by ChiMark (chewed up his body for a decade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Wouldn't a better headline have been: Clinton says Republicans doing this year what Democrats have done for decades?
22 posted on 09/13/2012 12:51:12 AM PDT by cashless (Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wish.


23 posted on 09/13/2012 1:14:05 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark
Buddy boy, there is no kinship between Nixon and Romney.

Romney may not believe in price controls.

Perhaps because he is not but he is not president yet. Romney does however certainly believe in growing government as did Nixon.

The next president will likely have to deal with inflation (it is already here but is being covered up for the benefit of the One) and you can bet that the suggestion of price controls will come up. Do you really believe that Romney won’t consider them?

24 posted on 09/13/2012 1:15:16 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"The American people have to believe me on this....

HA! FUBC!!!!!!

25 posted on 09/13/2012 1:16:06 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Clinton: Republican party controlled by most extreme members

If the Republican Party was controlled by its most extreme members we would not have Romney as our candidate.

26 posted on 09/13/2012 1:20:43 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

“Richard Nixon’s too liberal for these people”

Nixon? As in only Nixon can go to China? Mr. “We’re all Keynesians now”? Mr. Wage and Price Controls? Mr. Detente? Mr. EPA/OSHEA? Remind me why we’re supposed to like him. Alger Hiss?


27 posted on 09/13/2012 1:20:55 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Nixon? As in only Nixon can go to China? Mr. “We’re all Keynesians now”?

Did Nixon say that? I thought that was Time magazine.

But you forgot dropping the gold standard.

28 posted on 09/13/2012 1:25:07 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Remind me why we’re supposed to like him.

Well he did bring the Viet Nam war to a conclusion that would have been in our favor had it not been for the communist in the congress.

29 posted on 09/13/2012 1:28:25 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather


30 posted on 09/13/2012 2:09:36 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

“you forgot dropping the gold standard”

Yeah, but it was more of a technicality. 1933 was the watershed, which makes Nixon anticlamactic.


31 posted on 09/13/2012 3:02:39 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Projection. It amazes me how the libs love to project their pathologies on the right.

Nixon is the conservative extreme? My God are these people ill informed, delusional, brain dead, moonbat, libtard, ideologues.


32 posted on 09/13/2012 3:10:11 AM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

“Did Nixon say that?”

I am a bit guilty of perpetuating a media myth, here. Milton Friedman said it, as reported by Time. What he actually said was that we’re all Keynesians now in one sense, but in another sense no one is. I forget what the two senses are. Nixon explicitly said “I am now a Keynesian” when we went offthe good standard. Which isn’t the exact quote, but was bundled in people’s minds with Frirdman’s quote.

So though the quote is spiffied up, he essentially said the same thing.


33 posted on 09/13/2012 3:10:22 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So they’d all be members of the Communist-Fascist-Mohammadan-Anti-American Democrat Party instead ?


34 posted on 09/13/2012 9:45:32 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I was just browsing through the web when I thought of looking up the Clinton Foundation. Does Clinton actually benefit financially from his foundation? Anyway look at some of his contributors, seems like his has lots of friends in Muslim countries. Notice the UN agenda code words as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Criticism


35 posted on 09/15/2012 12:56:52 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
>>>Clinton: Republican party controlled by most extreme members<<<
Well, we all know that Clinton is controlled by his own extreme member.
36 posted on 09/15/2012 1:03:04 PM PDT by Shqipo (I am AttackWatch parolee #1,237. I am breaking my parole once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
Clinton: Republican party controlled by most extreme members

Yeah, since RINOs are socialist/RAT poseurs, and they control the party...I guess he's correct.

37 posted on 09/15/2012 1:13:10 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson