Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Hindu group screening anti-Islam film to make a point about tolerance
National Post ^ | September 13, 2012 | Adrian Humphreys

Posted on 09/13/2012 11:53:25 PM PDT by Squawk 8888

Saying it is a necessary part of furthering religious tolerance in Canada, a Canadian Hindu organization is organizing a public screening of the film that enflamed deadly protests and growing anger abroad over its mockery of the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

“It promotes tolerance of different ideas and different viewpoints within Canada,” said Ron Banerjee, director of the Canadian Hindu Advocacy, said Thursday. “It shows the value of tolerance to Muslims and the Islamic community and teaches them, in Canada, we do have tolerance and diversity and they are simply going to have to tolerate diverse viewpoints and opinions without rioting and without going berserk.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/13/2012 11:53:29 PM PDT by Squawk 8888
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

Canada Ping!


2 posted on 09/13/2012 11:54:30 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

The absurdity rises to a new level! Mark Steyn was proecuted for making a statement about Islam, IIRC. Canada is is a lost state, just gone over the PC edge with no returning.


3 posted on 09/13/2012 11:57:57 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

 

   

Tolerating Islamist intolerance

 
 


A great deal has been written on the 'cartoon controversy', but it is far from enough. The current storm of orchestrated violence and intimidatory protests across the world is symbolic of a deep and sustained intolerance among Muslims, and of rising levels of tolerance of Muslim intolerance, that jointly undermine the possibility of freedom in large parts of the world.

 

Crucially, it is precisely this tolerance of intolerance that has allowed vocal and violent radicalised Islamist minorities to silence Muslim majorities and to transform the global image of Islam into the grotesque parody of the faith that the Danish cartoons sought - perhaps indelicately - to reflect.

Offensive though these cartoons may have been - and they were not offensive to at least some Muslims, who saw in them, not an insult to the Prophet or the faith, but rather a critique of the unrelenting violence that has become the defining character of much of the Muslim world - the criminal incitement and calls to 'butcher/kill/behead those who insult Islam' have only reinforced the images the cartoons reflected, "allowing mass hysteria to define Islam's message".

What dishonours Islam more? A few irreverent cartoons? Or the acts of remorseless murder, of relentless violence against people of other faiths, of the intimidation and abuse of all other faiths and communities, which the Islamists - including states adhering to the Islamist ideology, such as Pakistan - routinely engage in? Why, then, does the Muslim world not rise up in rage against these fanatics and political opportunists who are bringing disgrace and disrepute to their faith? Why are the voices of criticism against extremist Islam and Islamist terrorism so muted?

Indeed, why is it that all occasional and invariably qualified criticism of these terrorists is accompanied by vague justifications of the need to 'understand root causes' and the 'hurt' caused to the 'Muslim psyche'? Is the 'Muslim psyche' uniquely susceptible to injury?

Venomous characterisations of Hindus, Jews, Christians and, generally, all kafirs, are the stock-in-trade of the discourse in some Muslim countries, often communicated through official media, such as national television channels. The ideologies of hatred against other faiths are systematically propagated in so many Muslim states - we in India are familiar with the Pakistani case, where school curricula routinely demonise non-Muslims.

And do the words or pictures or caricatures by non-Muslims do more injury to the 'Islamic world' than the hideous acts of terrorism that Islamists have been inflicting on non-Muslims - and, indeed, on so many Muslims - all over the world? Worse, after so many Muslim-majority states have simply wiped out their own minorities, or are, even today, in the process of doing so, these very states go shrieking around about 'hurting the sentiments of minorities' when something is said against Muslims or Islam.

Indeed, 'Islamic' states oppress even their own sectarian minorities - be they non-Wahabbi Sunnis in some cases, or Shia, Ismaili, Ahmadiya, or Sufi, in others - not only through systematic denial of elementary religious rights to these sects, but, as in the case of Pakistan, through state sponsored terrorist movements against such minorities - recall that the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan was set up by General Zia-ul-Haq to target Shias in the wake of the Iranian revolution, and continued to enjoy the support of the state under successor regimes, till it got mixed up with the Al Qaeda and anti-US terrorism, and lost its status as a sarkari (state supported) jihadi organisation.

Many 'Islamic' countries have institutionalised this intolerance, outlawing the public practice of any other Faith, and made the possession of any religious icon, other than Muslim, a punishable offence. Non-Muslim minorities live in abject terror of blasphemy laws in Pakistan, as in many other Muslim countries.

The truth is, the state lies behind much of the Islamist extremism and frenzy that we are witnessing today. To return to the case of the Danish cartoons, there was no 'spontaneous outburst' of popular sentiment; it was only after the Organisation of Islamic Countries decided to whip up emotions around the issue, and states like Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia began to incite the rabble through official statements and actions, or statements by religious leaders tied to the regimes there, disseminated through official media, that the violent street protests commenced.

In Pakistan, the protests and the violence have principally been led by the Jamaat-ud-Dawa - the reincarnation of the purportedly 'banned' Lashkar-e-Toiba - which has flourished under state patronage, and that was cast by the Musharraf administration into a 'leadership' role recently in the relief operations after the earthquake that devastated parts of Pakistan occupied Kashmir.

But the 'cartoon crisis' is not unique. Even while this controversy was raging across the world, Shia minorities were being attacked by Sunni terrorists in Pakistan; in the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, a case was registered against the local chapter of the Bible Society of India for the 'grievous crime' of distributing "gas cylinders, three water bottles, audio cassettes and a copy of the New Testament in Urdu" to earthquake victims in a village in Uri.

In Ladakh, riots were engineered between Muslims and Buddhists because some torn pages of the Quran were recovered, leading to allegations of sacrilege. In the Aligarh Muslim University, a young girl was being threatened with collective rape for daring to protest against a diktat against wearing jeans and a T-shirt. These are only a few current and proximate examples of a remorseless oppression over the decades.

Such thuggeries are, of course, not unique to Islam. There are extremist groups drawing dubious 'inspiration' from other faiths who ape such conduct as well, and Valentines Day this year - as in the past few years - attracted the ire and violence of Hindu extremist hooligans. But these remain - fortunately - aberrations in the larger context of conduct among adherents of other faiths. They have increasingly become the dominant form of public articulation in the Muslim community.

There is an American Indian saying: 'it takes an entire village to raise a single child'. Similarly, it takes a very large community, often entire nations, to raise a single suicide bomber. For far too long, extremist Muslim discourse has been tolerated - to the point of incitement to murder - in the belief that acts of terrorism are distinct from such ideologies of hatred. But it is the wide acceptance within large sections of Muslim communities in many countries of these ideologies of hatred that produce the environment within which groups can mobilise, recruit motivate, train and deploy terrorists and suicide bombers.

Muslim liberals have long advocated 'understanding and tolerance' when dealing with Muslim sensibilities, but have seldom been known to aggressively argue for greater 'understanding and tolerance' for other faiths in 'Islamic' countries, where the record of intolerance towards and oppression of religious minorities is utterly revolting. There is a great 'Muslim exceptionalism' at work here.

The 'Muslim world' demands an absolute freedom without limits, but confers no freedom whatsoever, either on other faiths, or on dissent within its own faith. The 'tolerance' advocated by certain passages in the Quran is only something to parade at inter-faith conferences, and constitutes no part of the practice of most Muslim majority states - no doubt with occasional exceptions.

The demand, today, to impose a selective censorship in Europe on speech that is insulting to Muslims - when similar speech against other faiths enjoys full freedom - is an effort by Muslim minorities to impose, through mass violence and intimidation, their belief systems within the larger systems they have come to inhabit.

Europe would be, not only foolish, but suicidal, if it succumbs to this terrorism and coercion to invent new curbs on the media and on the freedom of speech. The democratic world must remain committed to its enlightenment values and ideals, and to the rough-and-tumble of free discourse in the 'marketplace of ideas'. All communal thuggeries, whatever faith they may claim to 'represent', must be brought to an end, and every available means must be bent to this purpose.

Personally, I think, the more fun we make of our own religions, the better it will be for the whole world, and, indeed, for our respective Faiths. I am immensely proud of being a Sikh, and am confident that no jokes or cartoons can ever undermine the eternal verities of my religion.

 

http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/kpsgill/governance/06_Feb18Pio.htm

 

(Published in The Pioneer Newspaper, India.  February 18, 2006)





 

 

 

From Wiki:

Kanwar Pal Singh Gill

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanwar_Pal_Singh_Gill

Kanwar Pal Gill, was born in Ludhiana, Punjab, India. He began his career as a police officer in the north-eastern state of Assam, quickly earning a reputation as a tough officer. He became a household name across the country as Punjab police chief in the early 1990s, when he was credited with crushing a separatist revolt in the Sikh-majority state.

Widely given credit for addressing terrorism, Mr Gill was dubbed “Super Cop” after his success in Punjab. He publishes the Faultlines journal and runs the Institute for Conflict Management, as well as advising governments and institutions on security related issues. He was asked by the government of Sri Lanka last year for similar advice. Mr Gill has also written a book, “The Knights of Falsehood”, which explores the abuse of religious institutions by the politics of freedom struggle in Punjab.

He got involved in sports administration after retirement and is currently the IHF ( Indian Hockey Federation) president.

He has also been appointed as a consultant by the Chattisgarh government to help tackle the Naxalite movement in the state.

Quotes

“Democracy and liberalism are not a sufficient defence and this is a fact that the ideologues of ‘freedom’ need, equally, to comprehend. There is a fatal flaw in the liberal mind. Having established, in structure and form [though seldom in substance], a system of governance that corresponds to its conception of democracy, it feels that nothing more needs to be done. The ‘Truths’ of the liberal ideology are, as the American Declaration on the Rights of Man expresses it, ‘Self Evident’. They require no proof, no reiteration, and no defence - certainly no defence by force of arms. Once democracy [or even the ritual of quinquinneal elections] is established, according to liberal mythology, the mystical ‘invisible hand’ keeps everything in place; the ‘superior wisdom of the masses’ ensures order and justice...”. This is just so much rubbish. As we should know after living with falsehoods for fifty years now. Truth does not triumph; unless it has champions to propound it, unless it has armies to defend it.”

From his book, ‘Punjab: The Knights of Falsehood’

Criticism

For some critics his success is a part of the story started by predecessor Julio Francis Ribeiro who started the “Bullet for Bullet” campaign of hitting back at militants and the strong hand in dealing with militancy adopted by Chief minister Beant Singh.
 


4 posted on 09/14/2012 12:01:07 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

I seem to recall there is a law in Canada prohibiting the dissemination of material that would incite hatred of religious or ethnic groups.

Would screening this film not run afoul of this law?


5 posted on 09/14/2012 12:05:19 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
“The message seems to be: You have won because you are violent.”

You have to admit that the man has a point; an obvious point.

All over the world Canada, the US and Europe the Muslims can pretty much have their way because of two things

Oil money and

Violence

Oil money has allowed the Muslims to infiltrate the halls of power and the towers of academia.

Their propensity for violent backlash at the tiniest provocation has cowed civic leaders all over the world.

And yet political correctness prevents our leaders from limiting their emigration or even expelling those who commit violent crimes.

We need to pull our heads out of our nether regions and wake up to the fact that the current round of Muslim immigrants are not really compatible with our free society and perhaps we need to limit the number of Muslims permitted visas.

6 posted on 09/14/2012 12:21:55 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

No guarantee it would be enforced, There is a growing anti-Islam sentiment in Canada. Michael Coren and Brian Lily are informing Canadians about the true nature of extremism.


7 posted on 09/14/2012 12:31:54 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I found information on Michael Coren but I can’t seem to find anything on Brian Lily.


8 posted on 09/14/2012 12:43:41 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I think you need to actually read the article.


9 posted on 09/14/2012 12:47:46 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

I would agree...you can look at the timing of Islamic radical growth, and it all relates to oil money falling into their hands. The minute you cut off the oil money....they’d have no real method of carrying out their agenda.


10 posted on 09/14/2012 12:52:31 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

That law is being repealed.


11 posted on 09/14/2012 12:55:49 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

http://www.torontosun.com/author/brian-lilley


12 posted on 09/14/2012 12:57:44 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The minute you cut off the oil money....they’d have no real method of carrying out their agenda.

That would probably be true twenty years ago but I am not so sure now.

The radicals now have networks set up. They have established lines of communication.

Take away the money and they may have difficulties creating as much damage but they can still recruit new followers and spread their ideology.

The oil money is not even as important today as it was because the Islamic terror groups have spread out in to organized crime to fund their activities. Things like identity theft are now sources of income.

Taking away the limitless funds of Saudi Oil may reduce the funds going to terrorism and the spread of Islamic fundamentalism but only a bit.

13 posted on 09/14/2012 1:03:54 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Glad to hear it I thought that law was a ruthless tool to suppress free speech.


14 posted on 09/14/2012 1:10:21 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Thanks

I think I like him


15 posted on 09/14/2012 1:17:16 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Ezra Levant published the Mohammed cartoons for the same reason. We must stand up for freedom of speech. And so called “hate speech” laws in Europe and Canada are ridiculous and ought to go.


16 posted on 09/14/2012 1:42:44 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Ezra Levant’s show last night (Gerry Agar filling in) had some good comparisons of culture. It’s a sad day when stating the obvious seems revolutionary.


17 posted on 09/14/2012 3:25:19 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

There may be no anti-Islamic movie at all
Some interesting and convincing points are made.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all#.UFEGxGCRdVo.twitter


18 posted on 09/14/2012 4:04:48 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
I've seen those reports, which makes me wonder if the YouTube post was a false-flag op and/or the work of an agent provocateur.
19 posted on 09/14/2012 4:13:14 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

“Ezra Levant’s show last night (Gerry Agar filling in)”

Does it get any better than that ??!!

:)


20 posted on 09/14/2012 4:28:21 PM PDT by Dartman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

“Ezra Levant’s show last night (Gerry Agar filling in)”

Does it get any better than that ??!!

:)


21 posted on 09/14/2012 4:54:33 PM PDT by Dartman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dartman

Sorry for the double post.


22 posted on 09/14/2012 4:56:17 PM PDT by Dartman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dartman

Sun News is not terribly polished, but they leave Fox in the dust when it comes to boldness. I still can’t believe the way they wouldn’t let up on the CBC and their link to the porn. Very gutsy. And that Menzoid! What a funny, brilliant bundle of information!


23 posted on 09/14/2012 6:48:41 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson