Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin judge strikes down Scott Walker’s collective-bargaining law (Again)
Hotair ^ | 09/14/2012 | AllahPundit

Posted on 09/14/2012 6:26:44 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

We've been here before, remember? A left-wing judge struck down the law on a procedural technicality in May of last year. The Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed a month later. Bet heavily that this will be reversed too, just because I suspect America's not quite ready to start throwing up constitutional roadblocks to fiscal reforms while states are already teetering on a fiscal cliff. Especially after Wisconsin held an election just three months ago where voters had a chance to effectively decide that issue.

The law remains largely in force for state workers, though a federal judge struck down part of that section of the law as well earlier this year. But for city, county, and school workers the decision by Dane County Judge Juan Colas returns the law to its status before Walker signed his law in March 2011.

Colas ruled that the law violated workers' constitutional rights by making denying to union workers certain powers available to their nonunion counterparts. The decision could still be overturned on appeal – the Supreme Court has already restored the law once in June 2011 after it was blocked by a different Dane County judge earlier that year…

School districts and local officials will have to return to the bargaining table with their workers in a much more significant way. The decision raises a host of questions about changes in pay, benefits and work rules that have taken place in the meantime while bargaining was essentially dead.

Under Walker’s law, both the state and local governments were prohibited from bargaining over anything besides a cost of living salary adjustment. Other issues such as health benefits, pensions, workplace safety and other work rules were strictly off limits.

The decision’s here. The court concedes that there’s no constitutional right to collective bargaining; the argument is that the state discriminated against union employees, which makes it an equal protection issue. Typically in equal-protection jurisprudence, governments are given wide latitude in economic matters; go figure that Wisconsin wasn’t given that latitude here. But then, the legal reasoning isn’t important. The point of the ruling is to snatch victory on collective bargaining for the left from the jaws of defeat after defeat after defeat. Maybe that’s how union rights will be handled from now on — as with abortion rights, they’ll be yanked out of the hands of voters and kept safe from the grubby hands of democracy. A savvy move. And in the spirit of fire-with-fire, I guess it’s now time for more conservative judges to start thinking seriously about revisiting Lochner. Long live rule by judiciary!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: scottwalker; union; wisconsin

1 posted on 09/14/2012 6:26:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Reverse, then recall, this judge.


2 posted on 09/14/2012 6:32:24 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While there is nothing wrong for laws to be challenged in county courts, chronic judicial activism from one location affecting the entire state has its limits. It is due time for the State of Wisconsin to tell renegade judges in Dane county to F¥CK OFF.


3 posted on 09/14/2012 6:43:29 PM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Oh , goodie is this going to be a yearly thing ,strike it down then have it over turned


4 posted on 09/14/2012 6:51:42 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This decision will be; 1) enjoined by the Wisconsin Supremes, and then 2) overturned by the Wisconsin Supremes.


5 posted on 09/14/2012 6:55:14 PM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Judges have assumed far too much power


6 posted on 09/14/2012 7:06:35 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

They like to see how clever they are in writing their opinions against what they know is right.


7 posted on 09/14/2012 7:17:10 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Judges have assumed far too much power

Who ALLOWED that to happen? One guess.

8 posted on 09/14/2012 7:22:28 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Reverse, then recall, this judge.

Recall in Dane County, home of Madistan, which votes 80% demoRAT? The rogue judge will likely be given a huge raise as part of his payoff!

9 posted on 09/14/2012 7:29:43 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Walker should simply declare that he is ignoring this ruling, since it was already upheld by the WI Supreme Court in mid-2011


10 posted on 09/14/2012 7:31:18 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A quick search reveals the judge is the first Hispanic judge in that county. An immigrant from Colombia, he was appointed by Gov. Jim Doyle, an ultra-liberal from Madison who was an early supporter of Obama. Any questions?


11 posted on 09/14/2012 7:33:29 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcrngroup

Would a recall be by Dane County voters only or would all of Wisconsin vote on it?


12 posted on 09/14/2012 7:33:32 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks SeekAndFind.
A left-wing judge struck down the law on a procedural technicality in May of last year. The Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed a month later. Bet heavily that this will be reversed too...

13 posted on 09/14/2012 7:41:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeronL
If the legislature created the lower court then it has the power to pass legislation that includes clauses removing certain legislation from the purview of that court. If that does not work the legislature can abolish the court and start anew. If that does not work then it is time to start decorating lampposts.
14 posted on 09/14/2012 8:03:55 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

bump


15 posted on 09/14/2012 8:13:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Since this ia a local Dane County court judge, it would only be Dane County voters to vote in any recall of this judge. The truth of the matter is, any proposed recall of this liberal activist judge would very likely fall way short of even gatherimg enough signatures for a recall.

Even in the recalls of last year (2011) and this year, the RATs & their union thugs were able to easily gather enough signatures for 9 recalls against Repub state senators (who lost 2 of the recalls in 2011 and 1 more in June 2012). Therefore the RATs have the majority now in the WI state senate unless the Repubs can win back at least 2 senate races while not losing any more.

Conversely the Repubs were able to gather signatures for only 3 recalls against Dems, all of which the Dems won easily. Its sad, when 14 demoRAT senators skip the state & run away from their legislative responsiblities, and yet only Repubs could only manage to gather enough petition signatures to force 3 recall elections against the demoRATs. The other 11 demoRATs didn't even have to worry about petition signatures, let alone having to defend themselves in recall elections.

The constant recalls & court challenges ALWAYS in radical liberal Madistan & Dane County will now be a standard go-to process for the dems in WI. That's why Gov Scott Walker simply needs to issue executive orders against judges who rule agains this, and to declare the judge's rulings to be null & void.

16 posted on 09/14/2012 9:18:12 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

I don’t see how a law can be created that tells me I can’t get together with fellow workers, develop a list of changes I would like to see in the work plan and then approach the boss about it.

If you live by the guide that you should go to the root of the problem, then blame must be placed on those that gave away the store, not those that organized to try and get it.

If someone tells me I can’t organize I’m going to say, oh yea, just watch me. Maybe I am just from a different generation.


17 posted on 09/14/2012 9:56:17 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The people need some sort of a power over judges which the system is not presently providing...


18 posted on 09/15/2012 3:55:37 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
http://www.wisconsinaction.com/

fight them till hell freezes over, then fight them on ice.



19 posted on 09/15/2012 7:30:59 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson