Replies

Almost none of this makes any sense.

His State charges are 15 years old, thus he would not still be on "parole" for those.

The Fed Charges in which he served time, leaves a person under what is called "Supervised Release" for X number of years as ordered by the sentencing Judge.

This period comes with "conditions" of which not using the Internet could be one of them.

However, if a person is thought to have violated the conditions of their Supervised Release, it is up to U.S. Marshals to take said person into custody, NOT any local, or state LEO's.

Then, the person gets a hearing before a Judge whereby they are represented by an attorney and evidence is introduced and can be challenged. Thereafter, the Judge will make a ruling on whether the person is thought to have violated the conditions and he/she can order him to serve the time left on his his Supervised Release, add more time thereto and let them go or a combination thereof.

Regardless, this stinks to high Heaven and appears to be politically directed in order to take the heat off from Dear Reader.

neveralib wrote: " Almost none of this makes any sense."

There's an excerpt of another article linked below plus a list of probable other reasons for the man being taken into custody.

It's simply too early to begin arguing merits of an undefined as of yet, criminal case, or a potential false arrest charge. Such discussion would only be based upon news articles which were composed of snippets of information given to local news outlets thus far.

However, you can rest assured that the man is represented by more than one attorney, as mentioned in the articles "attorneys," that said attorneys were present in the man's home most of the day, and that his attorneys were also present when their client was taken into custody.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2931385/posts?page=18#18

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2931385/posts?page=29#29

neveralib wrote: "Regardless, this stinks to high Heaven and appears to be politically directed in order to take the heat off from Dear Reader."

What does that mean? Also who or what entity were you referring to when you wrote "Dear Reader" ?