Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitchbegan cooperating with prosecutors after 2009 fraud
Smoking Gun ^ | September 14, 2012 | Smoking Gun

Posted on 09/15/2012 7:40:08 PM PDT by Fred

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Fred

Ok, i thought Fed Snitchbegan sounded like a made up name, but after reading the title again, I see that it was simply a typo.


41 posted on 09/15/2012 10:30:36 PM PDT by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitchbegan

Never ever trust a snitchbegan!

42 posted on 09/15/2012 10:59:03 PM PDT by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Can you say “false flag”?


43 posted on 09/15/2012 11:13:11 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

“Nakoula called the Coptic Bishop of Los Angeles, Bishop Serapion, and denied any involvement.”

The Bishop said a few days ago that he knew him but he didn’t attend Church.


44 posted on 09/15/2012 11:18:42 PM PDT by bronxville (Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
The Late Sir Lawrence Olivier insults Islam

LOL!

May the video be viewed in Canada, the EU, the OIC, and anywhere else it may be deemed illegal or politically incorrect!

45 posted on 09/15/2012 11:33:35 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus

“It’s looking more and more like this film was supposed to the first amendment what Fast & Furious was supposed to be to the second. F&F was about finding a pretext to ban guns, and this looks like a pretext to go after free speech.”

I agree with you. Some think it’s about the blind sheik but something tells me it’s about the UN Resolution 16/18 which both Obama and Hillary support.

When one watches these riots and gets reports there’s usually no surprises. We see the reporter interviewing one or more of the male protestors, people we’ve seen minutes before leading the parade and goading the followers. They’re usually decent looking w/ intense serious eyes, decently clad, and English speaking. And they all have a demand, shared w/ the reporters in increments, the major goal coming at the end. One can watch them write the actual story for the reporters.

Here’s an example...

[...] Standing in front of the new wall, the demonstrators’ demands were a moving target. Some said THEY WANTED the United States to APOLOGIZE for the video. Told that both Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had condemned the video earlier this week, they then said THEY WANTED an INVESTIGATION. Told that the U.S. was looking into the video, they said THEY WANTED it REMOVED from YouTube, a step outside U.S. government control. [...]Nearby, Mustafa Amin, 26, an unemployed teaching school graduate, PROPOSED AN INTERNATIONAL LAW “ that would CRIMINALIZE ANY ASSAULT ON THE PROPHET. And it should be under the supervision of the United Nations.”
http://www.stripes.com/news/vi...

Bottomline: criminalize speech.

International Law - UN Resolution 16/18:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ab...

How Obama Engineered Mideast Radicalization
http://news.investors.com/ibd-...

HILLARY CLINTON’S CLOSE TIES TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.
http://gillreport.com/2012/06/hillary-clintons-close-ties-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/

Obama vs. the First Amendment

In 2009, the Obama State Department ceremoniously joined with Muslim governments to propose a United Nations resolution that, as legal commentator Stuart Taylor observed, was “all-too-friendly to censoring speech that some religions and races find offensive.” Titled “Freedom of Opinion and Expression” — a name only an Alinskyite or a Muslim Brotherhood tactician could love — the resolution was the latest salvo in a years-long campaign by the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference (now renamed the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation”). The OIC’s explicit goal is to coerce the West into adopting sharia, particularly its “defamation” standards. [...]
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/321039/obama-vs-first-amendment-andrew-c-mccarthy#

There may be no anti-Islamic movie at all (dubbing...):
http://www.csmonitor.com/World...

Do you remember the American version of the mohammed cartoons that started the riots in Europe and the Middle East a few years ago, which was later established that some of the more inflammatory cartoons were created by the mullahs who were preaching jihad in Europe. What’s to stop them from doing the same thing to this movie. And being a Coptic it’s not out of the realm of possibility that the guy has family in Egypt and he’s been coerced. Anyway all I know is that it reeks of malfeasence.

Note: Sometimes one needs reminding that the gaols of Islam and National Socialism are basically the same. Hitler also enjoyed an alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood.


46 posted on 09/15/2012 11:59:13 PM PDT by bronxville (Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; Fred; All

I’m trying to pin down how Steve Klein is connected to this movie. Is it true he’s also anti- Catholic and anti-Mormon?

“But a Christian activist involved in the film project, Steve Klein, told the AP on Wednesday that Bacile was a pseudonym and that the man was Christian. Klein had told the AP on Tuesday that the filmmaker was an Israeli Jew who was concerned for family members who live in Egypt”

[Then there is information that Klein ran for the California Insurance Commissioner under the American Independent Party in 2000]. Knowing that, it makes it hard to connect this exclusively to the Left.....????

I can’t connect all the dots. They keep going off in different directions.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2930826/posts


47 posted on 09/16/2012 12:04:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus; All
"................Nakoula was arrested in June 2009, pleaded no contest to the bank fraud charges a year later and was released from federal prison in June 2011 after serving a 21-month prison term, according to federal records.

An initial report about the federal probation review appeared in The Wall Street Journal.

There are indications that "Innocence of Muslims" may have already been under way as a film project when Mr. Nakoula was arrested. A casting call for actors and crew for a film called "Desert Warrior" ran in Backstage magazine, based in Los Angeles and New York, in May and June 2009. The casting call described the film project as a "historical Arabian Desert adventure" and listed a "Sam Bassiel" as producer.................."

WSJ - Sept 15, 2012: Authorities Interview U.S. Filmmaker

48 posted on 09/16/2012 2:00:35 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Thanks Fred.


49 posted on 09/16/2012 6:48:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Actually Bishop Serapion said that Nakoula only attended his home parish sporadically. (Even in a close-knit community like the Coptic church in the U.S. it is very unlikely that a bishop would know one of his flock who didn’t attend church at all.)

Still, the question is, why did the not-particularly-pious Nakoula go to the trouble of calling his bishop to deny involvement?

I’m wondering whether there isn’t a convoluted money trail here — given Nakoula’s past — and Nakoula is being played as a patsy by Egyptian Salafists who wanted a provocation supposedly created by Copts and Jews. Did he produce the film, but not the dubs posted to YouTube? Is he really the “Sam Bacile” who opened the YouTube account — a question that, alas, can’t be answered without him admitting it, if he is, or access to the IP addresses from which the account was opened and the videos uploaded to prove one way or the other otherwise?


50 posted on 09/16/2012 7:13:45 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson