“Supporting him is one thing, but trying to create the myth that he is pro-life”
Then it sounds like we agree. You just don’t say that Mitt is pro-life because of his past position and he support of rape, incest exception.
OK. I was just using the term “pro-life” to mean that his position now is that he opposes the vast majority of abortions. That is all that I meant. Opposing most reasons for abortion is better than Obama and the Democrats.
At some point you need to tell the truth.
You just repeated your falsehood again, we all know that “health of mother” means abortion on demand, and that is Mitt’s position, it is not what you claimed.
Mitt now claims that he openly campaigned on being against the party platform, being pro-abortion for “health”, “rape”, and “incest”, and that the republicans voted for him knowing that position.
You guys have backed a monster of epic proportions.