Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup 7 Day Tracking Trend
Gallup ^ | 9/16/2012 | Self

Posted on 09/16/2012 10:08:57 PM PDT by Positive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Cruising For Freedom
I am a huge poll/number junkie and I sign up on FR every 4 years just to get involved in the poll discussions.

Why do you have to sign up every 4 years? Registration here is permanent, unless you earn a zot, or opus out.

41 posted on 09/17/2012 5:34:45 AM PDT by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
Why Romney’s camp would allow any of these moderators is beyond me.

The report is each side was able to reject one proposal from the other. Romney rejected MSNBC, Øbama rejected Fox. Leaving the rest of MSM as options. After getting Fox shut down Mitt should have offered Limbaugh (presuming his hearing could have made it work)) - his audience is much larger than CNNs - or perhaps a panel of Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck. Could also have thrown in some web based folks. Limiting options to TV is agreeing to lose.

42 posted on 09/17/2012 5:57:43 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Romney is good in debates.

Romney has become a good debater, but he had some bad ones with the conservatives running. I hope he doesn’t bet 10,000 to Obama or anything...I think that was the low point of the Romney debates. As long as he doesn’t do anything that stupid again, he should be ok.


43 posted on 09/17/2012 6:01:17 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Paul Ryan/Rick Santorum 2012....That would be the best scenario ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
“.. the Gallup trend for Obama is faltering.”

That’s because they are getting ready for their run to reality.

Maybe, but methodology makes a difference in many ways.

For Example: Landline and cell phone telephone numbers were randomly selected for inclusion in the survey using a probability proportionate to size method, which means that phone numbers for each state are proportional to the number of voters in each state.

California had 12,000,000 voters in 2008 and Øbama won it by 25% nearly 3,000,000 votes.

So this "probability proportionate to size method" seems to give a bias toward Øbama. With huge victorys in California and New York possibly giving Øbama the popular vote total (the national poll numbers) while having no more influence on the Electoral College than a 1 vote edge.

44 posted on 09/17/2012 8:28:55 AM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I lose interest after elections and forget usernames/passwords.


45 posted on 09/17/2012 5:48:46 PM PDT by Cruising For Freedom (Don't be the proof that MSM PsyOps works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

I told you so, I was right, Just making a point, bumping my own comment.


46 posted on 10/03/2012 10:39:00 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson