His argument was idiotic and based on ignorance.
One need not, and is idiotic, to suggest that people born of rape are so rare, while inventing a biological mechanism to prevent it, that one need not deal with the issue.
All that needs to be said is that punishing a child for the crimes of the father is an outdated and barbaric practice.
But Akin had to be an idiot. And now his wife on the campaign payroll has to talk about rape? She is a moron. As is he for hiring her.
So support him. I am not trying to stop you. Campaign donations to Akin go to pay his wife and son and they apparently need the money. So pay up!
And you have to be the avenging angel, don't you?
He wasn't making an "argument," and the only "ignorance" he showed was to not bow in homage to leftist sensibilities.
He didn't "invent" a biological mechanism, he extrapolated from one. And it's one that is NOT without merit.
Okay, so he didn't carry himself is such a way as not to commit the heinous sin of embarrassing you in front of your liberal friends. He didn't parse his statements well enough to avoid their criticism.
I say, better his mistakes than your effete duplicity
Remind me again of "how rare" (another 9.5 out of ten, maybe) he said children born of rape are.....
No, at this point the only thing that explains your antipathy is a need to "save face" and while you don't affect my ability to support Akin, you sure are good at making a waste of what I send him. And how am I to know you aren't going to sabotage any other conservative candidate that hurt your chances to eat lunch at the table with the "mean girls."