Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: One-Third Of Lowest Income Voters Support Romney
TPM ^ | September 18, 2012 | Tom Kludt

Posted on 09/18/2012 5:14:49 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo

While Mitt Romney continues to suffer the fallout from a video that shows him dismissing President Barack Obama's voters, or 47 percent of Americans, as invididuals who do not pay income taxes and depend on government entitlements, new research from Gallup released Tuesday shows that the Republican nominee claims the support from more of those individuals than his remarks seem to suggest.

According to Gallup's polling from the tracking period of Aug. 27-Sept. 16, 34 percent of voters whose household incomes are less than $24,000 a year support Romney. Obama easily wins among those voters, earning the support of 58 percent.

As Gallup points out, a significant portion of the individuals who pay no income tax are the same voters in the lowest income bracket, roughly a third of whom intend to vote for Romney, not Obama.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; 47percent; poll; poverty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Mitt HAD significant support in this group until he went Thurston Howell, linking working Americans to welfare moochers with no personal responsibility and giving them up to Obama.
1 posted on 09/18/2012 5:14:55 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The golden third who prefer the dignity of a paycheck over a welfare check. They want a job. Not a handout.


2 posted on 09/18/2012 5:17:59 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
One-Third Of Lowest Income Voters Support Romney

It's the lowest income people who actually don't want to stay the lowest income people!

3 posted on 09/18/2012 5:18:07 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Let’s hope Romney clarifies his statement and takes pains to separate low income responsible working Americans From those who take from government without taking care of themselves.


4 posted on 09/18/2012 5:22:32 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Anyoine who wants a rosey future for themselves and their children had better vote for Mitt Romney. Never thought I’d say such a thing, but, folks, this damaging swing to the left has got to come to a screeching halt!


5 posted on 09/18/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Let’s hope Romney clarifies his statement and takes pains to separate low income responsible working Americans From those who take from government without taking care of themselves.

Agreed. I haven't forgotten all the good FReepers who announced the loss of a job over the last few years.
6 posted on 09/18/2012 5:32:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Mitt HAD significant support in this group until he went Thurston Howell, linking working Americans to welfare moochers with no personal responsibility and giving them up to Obama.

If you read his full quote, carefully, he made no such link. First, in response to a question about his chances to get elected he estimated (a tad too high, I'd say) that 47% of the country was definitely voting for Obama. Then he listed the SEGMENTS which are INCLUDED in this group. He clearly isn't saying that ALL members of each group favor Obama's vision of increasing dependency on government. Just that, collectively, there's enough of them to this a tight election (and hence, the need for more dollars from those in the audience). That's not linkage, that's an essentially correct analysis and effective fundraising.
7 posted on 09/18/2012 5:33:58 PM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Yea, they’re called retirees.


8 posted on 09/18/2012 5:35:04 PM PDT by Bogey78O (Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

It’s too bad Romney didn’t mention that among other would-be voters, Obama is favored by more than 90% of the country’s murders, rapists and gang-bangers. Maybe those who don’t favor coddling criminals would wake up and see the other divergent positions of this poseur and become repulsed.


9 posted on 09/18/2012 5:36:30 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Titles a little backward. Lmao


10 posted on 09/18/2012 5:38:18 PM PDT by linn37 (Newt supporter here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zencycler

He needs to take pains to clarify his statement.


11 posted on 09/18/2012 5:38:25 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
I live in a very well-to-do town in Mass. Now, let's be serious: there is no chance that former MA Gov Romney will carry the state. Everyone knows that. Any way, as I drive through my town, I see a great many Obama/Biden signs in front of some very pricey real estate. The rich Liberals sure do love Obama.

If you want to see any Romney signs, you have to go to the poor part of town. The workers around here seem to undertand what's happening to the country. The corporate lawyers and mergers & acquisitions guys, on the other hand, don't seem to mind the current regime.

12 posted on 09/18/2012 5:39:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

He said on Cavuto that he respects the good our safety net does for those who need it. A good ad would reach out to people who have been disenfranchised by Obama’s economy, and point out those collecting the same benefits for the wrong reasons. There are many clips of Obama’s supporters yelling, “I don’t need to pay for my food! Obama’s gonna do that for me, gee!”

Such people annoy everyone.


13 posted on 09/18/2012 5:41:42 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I have a number of employees who make from 24-37K and all do not like Obama..not one.

I know white liberals in urban Nashville who adore the guy and all are technically millionaires

Out here in rural middle TN it is divided not by poor or rich but by race or where folks are from

Whites from Detroit, Indiana, upper Midwest or the South naturally...conservative

Whites from the northeast or California here...much less likely to vote GOP...

that’s how it breaks...money has little to do with it really

though a few welfare whites might vote Obama but quietly


14 posted on 09/18/2012 5:42:51 PM PDT by wardaddy (this is a perfect window for Netanyahu to bomb Iran..I hereby give my go ahead..thanks Muzzie idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

BS. These are people who understand Mitt’s goal is to get them out of poverty. Oh and your little Thurston Howell coronet is pure Dem Underground crap.


15 posted on 09/18/2012 5:43:08 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Please realize that Romney did not say that everyone that doesn’t have a job and can’t pay taxes is a Zer0 supporter. He said that those that don’t pay taxes, don’t have a job, and are choosing to mooch of the government are Zer0 supports.


16 posted on 09/18/2012 5:43:22 PM PDT by PJBankard (I told my friends I was heading to Octermocty for the weekend. They replied... "Wear the fox hat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Nobody could call Reagan a Thurston Howell. I wish Romney would have studied Reagan more.


17 posted on 09/18/2012 5:47:57 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

You’re quite the anti Romney poster, aren’t you!!!!

I find it almost laughable. With some of you, Romney wasn’t hitting the entitlement crowd hard enough. When he did just that, you claim he was too harsh.

Don’t you worry, we have his back.

Romney/Ryan2012.


18 posted on 09/18/2012 5:49:04 PM PDT by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

Nobody knows what the idiot means.

Half of FR responds to him as if he is saying “the” 47% who draw a check from the government.

Half of FR responds to him as if he is saying “the” 47% who do not owe income tax in a given year.

He didn’t simply mean 47% of the total electorate.

The $200,000 and above earners voted for Obama by 52% to 46% for McCain.

Social security Americans age 65 and older – were the ONLY age group to support the losing candidate, Sen. John McCann. And, it was by a sizable margin – 53% for McCain and only 45% for the winner, Sen. Barack Obama.


19 posted on 09/18/2012 5:54:54 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

A lot of folks in the one percent are quite willing to support the ten percent while Romney seems to have some problems understanding the whole 47 percent.


20 posted on 09/18/2012 5:57:23 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson