Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; NFHale
RE:”Polls can be used as a weapon. The result is a de facto means of voter suppression. Those that may be hoping for a Romney victory may see poll after poll with President Obama supposedly in the lead, and believe that it’s not worth voting. Even if it were to peel off 1% or 2%, it could end up having an effect on the election. If you don't believe so, ask Al Gore if a scant few votes can make a difference.

I keep hearing and reading this assertion but what is the basis for it? (besides Rush said it.)

There is also a theory that if a candidate peaks too soon that the voters can get buyers remorse and the other candidate becomes the underdog, demotivating the first's base voters and motivating the second’s base voters. In addition the media gets bored and starts going after the one on top to keep the story going, no story without a race.

Why bother voting if you are not enthused and you think your side will win easily anyway?

I am always suspicious of these grand conspiracy theories.

5 posted on 09/25/2012 5:39:47 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

How did the exit polls do in 2010? Garbage in Garbage out, they are only used to defeat us.

Pray for America


6 posted on 09/25/2012 5:42:24 AM PDT by bray (If you vote for a communist what does that make you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson