Posted on 09/26/2012 6:28:14 AM PDT by chessplayer
Via the Standard, a fine idea that I would take more seriously if he had mentioned it before the movie was condemned by the Cairo embassy, blamed for the Benghazi attack by Susan Rice, apologized for by the State Department via TV ads in Pakistan, and then discussed at length by The One himself in his UN speech today. Scrambling to denounce the film the way the administration did made it that much more lucrative a pretext for Islamists to exploit; the U.S. government can’t ban the film, but attack an embassy or two and by golly they’ll fall all over themselves to reassure you that it’s a wicked, awful, evil piece of expression.
They have..............You’re the only one who keeps bringing it up, moron........
Pretty tough to do when 0BAMA is TALKING about it every d@mn 5 minutes!!
Like minds....
;^)..........
Yup. Thats ALL he’s been talking about. Apologizing to Pakistan for it. And Egypt. And the UN.
The very way they are trying to set this up in a way to actually ban free speech (even when saying they are not) is the same kind of strategy they will use to ban guns. Their playbook is about the only thing transparent about the liberals and socialists.
If the United States is anything other than the most powerful nation on Earth, we will ban free speech, eventually. There's no two ways about it. It doesn't matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican as president.
Want your constitutional rights? America has to be the world's superpower.
Yeah, that movie that no one knew about until I started talking about it.
That was a ridiculous movie by the way. I mean it was off the charts ridiculous.
There is a pending Executive Order that would give Obama the right to switch off the internet in times of a security crisis. Similar legislation, introduced by Joe Lieberman, was defeated earlier this year.
There is a recent report that shows Obama KNEW that the Libyan embassy attacks were linked to AlQueda within 24 hours. But he sent a lackey to all the Sunday news programs to blame it on the video anyway.
Why would he do that? Why would he continue to put the spotlight on the video?
A: because he wants to be able to link the internet video with violence that is considered to be a crisis-level event. He wants another embassy to suffer another murder, but to have it happen BECAUSE of the video. Then he could justify his extremist Executive Order and control the one area of free speech that liberals do not control: the internet.
-effectively disarmed our troops with rules of engagement
-abandoned Iraq to a power vacuum
-supported/ assisted in deposing strong leaders in Egypt and Libya to a power vaccuum
-extolled the virtues of the Arab Spring
-sent a clear message to the Arabs/ Muslims that he does NOT have Israel’s back
-refuses to be tough with Iran
THEN OBAMA
-spiked the ball many times recently on the bin Laden raid/ killing, to the outrage of Muslims
-floated the line immediately that the raid on the embassy was spontaneous based on a film trailer the nobody even heard of in this country, inflaming Muslims
-continues to bring the film short up, despite obvious facts that prove the film had nothing to do with it and that the embassy attack was pre-planned by terrorists
No, mister obama is intentionally fanning the flames of Muslim unrest. I predict, before the election, obama will somehow use the unrest to stage some kind of attack that will make some think it unwise to vote a sitting President out of office.
If so, once again the Leftist Rats will be pi$$ing on our heads and telling us it is raining.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.