Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Noted Economist Says You Should be Worried About Latest Durable Goods Report: Here’s Why
The Blaze ^ | 09/29/2012 | Becket Adams

Posted on 09/29/2012 1:05:50 PM PDT by nhwingut

Demand for durable goods (i.e. items that are expected to last for at least three years) is on the decline and a report released on Thursday shows that it has sunken to levels not seen since 2009 — the height of the Great Recession.

“The Commerce Department said Thursday that total durable goods orders fell 13.2 percent in August. That’s the biggest drop since January 2009 when the country was in recession. Aircraft orders fell by nearly 102 percent, pulling down the headline figure,” the Associated Press reports.

Economists had originally predicted a decline of maybe 5 percent. Obviously, they were off by just a little.

“U.S. manufacturing has weakened since the spring. Factories have been hurt by weaker consumer spending and slower global growth that has cut demand for U.S. exports,” the AP adds.

Okay, so what’s the big deal? Maybe we shouldn’t read too much into the data, right?

Well, according to economist David Rosenberg, there’s a part of the report that should raise some red flags. If you look at the three-month moving average* of non-defense capital goods orders (or “core capex [capital expenditures] orders”) excluding aircraft in Thursday’s durable goods report, you’ll note that it was -4.1 percent in August.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: economy; jobs; offbyjustalittle
Zero and the media just need 38 more days to trick the voters.
1 posted on 09/29/2012 1:06:01 PM PDT by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

It’s official, we have entered the Obayma depression.


2 posted on 09/29/2012 1:15:54 PM PDT by exnavy (The time is upon us, fish or cut bait, may God guide your heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Aircraft orders fell by nearly 102 percent

Now THAT is BAD! How does that work?

3 posted on 09/29/2012 1:21:50 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
I think the new recession "formally" started in June. Retail sales around here are off 15-20% from last year, and 2011 was hardly a boom time.

If we can't keep borrowing enough money from China to keep the EBT cards working and mask the existence of the Greater Depression, we're going to have to send the Navy out to conquer some countries so we can confiscate and sell off their gold to raise cash. I guess Libya didn't have enough left in their vaults, except for the debased tungsten-core stuff. Maybe some "Cubans" will try to take over the Cayman Islands, and give Obama the pretext he needs. :)

People are scared to spend on anything right now, if you know what I mean - and I think you do. Thus, November 7th might mark a short-term rally start date.

4 posted on 09/29/2012 1:27:25 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

bump

Welcome to the Depression


5 posted on 09/29/2012 1:28:27 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
People are scared to spend on anything right now, if you know what I mean - and I think you do.

While that may be true, the news reports I hear, claim consumer confidence is up and retail sales projections are also..........go figure.

Romney can't beat Obama on the economy, he needs to destroy him personally by revealing all the fraud and corruption!!!

6 posted on 09/29/2012 1:52:06 PM PDT by varon (I remember when America was American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Aircraft orders fell by nearly 102 percent

Now THAT is BAD! How does that work?

I'm not sure how it works in that case, but it could work that way if more orders were cancelled than were made.

7 posted on 09/29/2012 2:08:41 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: varon

I always thought one of the best lines of attack on Obama would be going after his administration’s grotesque record of crony-corruption and sleaze. It’s one of the only subjects that even makes libs themselves squirm, when it is courtesy of one of their own. And it appeals to independents too. But the GOP-E types avoided it like the plague, seemingly giving Obama a free pass (and making me doubt any interest Romney and his team might actually have in these matters).


8 posted on 09/29/2012 2:17:41 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Cancellations of existing orders.


9 posted on 09/29/2012 2:48:18 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Why would they need to conquer other nations to get gold when all obama has to do is order everyone to turn over their personal gold.

I don’t feel good about this election. Can anyone explain why the GOP stuffed Romney down our throats other than they either

A) are in cahoots with the dems and want to this country

or

B) they know a collapse is coming and they don’t want to be in charge

or

C) they’re just plain incompetent

Any other ideas?


10 posted on 09/29/2012 3:12:51 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Good. Starve the regulation-obsessed B. It doesn’t need more stinkin’ revenues. Let’s see how far she can go on debt alone.


11 posted on 09/29/2012 3:14:49 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

One party is socialist and leans a little more toward shoveling more of the debt to federal incomes (more regulation/monitoring against large, government-linked businesses). The other party is socialist and leans a little more toward shoveling more of the debt to local government incomes (more local regulation/monitoring against private sector individuals).

Local governments receive much from federal funding to watch and prosecute local individuals and families to prevent them from rising to compete in business. One solution to that problem is that of falling residential real estate prices (shrinking property taxes). The other is general default.

Most individuals with higher incomes are quite dependent on government for those incomes. Even service businesses depend on customers with government incomes.

Both parties are fascist on issues of political correctness (trying to shove their social pathologies into the brains and habits of the more common, realistic majority of the population). See comment #11, just after yours, and get ready. Both political parties have destroyed most of the private sector and most of its families.

Without a large and truly domestic manufacturing base (i.e., not only “US-based”) and the common morality of yesteryear, we deserve what we are about to receive.


12 posted on 09/29/2012 3:41:32 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: varon
the news reports I hear, claim consumer confidence is up and retail sales projections are also

And they're not lying. The part they don't understand is that consumer spending does not drive the economy. Business-to-business spending is a larger percentage of the GDP and it's business investment that creates economic growth. The Keynesians [and our nation is infested with them] don't care about business.

After all, you can't be a consumer until you produce something to sell [or until the government compels someone to produce for you.]

They've been wrong, of course, for 80 years since FDR was president. But, hey, who's counting?

13 posted on 09/29/2012 3:47:20 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Without economic freedom, no other form of freedom can have material meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

And I’m afraid that “what we are about to receive” ain’t gonna’ be pretty. The only question is how long before it gets very bad? I think it’ll be no longer than two years. What say you?


14 posted on 09/29/2012 9:22:19 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
"And I’m afraid that 'what we are about to receive' ain’t gonna’ be pretty."

See the following old news. I've seen quite a few bits and pieces of related news from recent years. Notice the demographic. Very political and connected to bureaucratic interests and fund flows. Their neighborhood was bristling only with Democrat campaign signs four years ago. Some of them denied it through the Internet here. [Howdy neighbors.]

Intelligent Investing Panel
Going Great Guns
Forbes
David Serchuk, 04.23.09
"Thomas:...But, you know, you could always find another job that would pay all right, and pay slightly above minimum wage, could allow you to at least live and have a home in most communities. And I think that's slowly changed."
[...]
"Forbes: I was in Colorado, and I knew people who had 200, 300 guns. And they'd stash them in various hidden places around their compound. This wasn't all that uncommon out west."
[...]
"Sonders:...we have gone from a couple decades ago being a manufacturing economy to more of a service-oriented, information economy. That has just displaced permanently a lot of workers,..."

The regulatory/"education" bureaucrats dream of a genocide to wipe out those they see as useless eaters competing for funds, but that won't materialize. The most downscale folks have seen poverty before and will survive in enormous numbers (see similar historical situations).

What they might see, though, is a serious of violent incidents between their own subgroups over funding. Occurrences in Wisconsin and a few other locales are only a peek at a gesture of things possibly to come. Who'd have thought that the most evil "preppers" are government employees and the contractors and service folks who depend on the ongoing (so far) pork?

Also see the incidents in Greece, etc. Nope--no impoverished rednecks or slum residents there. But more than enough political/regulator class ex- and current teachers, pensioners, police, inspectors, social workers, all.

"The only question is how long before it gets very bad? I think it’ll be no longer than two years. What say you?"

The Fed recently moved their projected early date for rate hikes from 2014 to sometime in 2015. That would be a guess about a most positive scenario with no events to cause any great market fluctuations. We've already come too far with the debt regime.

The interest rate hikes will be the beginning of "the end," so to speak, with bond collapse (investor "haircuts"), interest rate hikes spreading throughout the system, unprecedented business closings and job losses, extreme cuts of government spending, various deals to repudiate various portions of debt, "haircuts" against pensions, etc.

Small governments without adequate funds for regulating against new competition (environmental, etc.), brainwashing children (public education), and the like, can run on agriculture and commodities. Big governments need big manufacturing for "sustainable" revenues. The current situation is running too much on debt to survive.

So how will our government (all levels) of the future regulate and break up families to keep peasants from staying with their own clans and making useful things? It won't. To use yet another cliche, history does tend to repeat itself.

Funny, you know. So many individuals in my generation (Baby Boomers) loved Monty Python, and many of them might resemble characters from it in the near future. They won't like that so much. But I'm going to laugh my ___ off. [See fathers'/family rights, 1980s, 1990s. We of the more conservative, traditional contingent saw it coming.]


15 posted on 09/30/2012 12:26:40 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson