Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists

When it comes to the film Innocence of Muslims, our government and the media uses a narrative mired in contradictions and false statements provided by the filmmaker, who himself is an untrustworthy source.

If we stick to what can be proven we might obtain the possibility that terror supporters produced the film. Muhammad Al Dura and Pallywood are two cases in point showing the type of stunts used by Palestinian terrorists.

Court documents reveal that Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin.

I was wondering why the filmmaker would try to hide what the movie was about from his actors, and just dub in the anti-Muhammed stuff later. Why treat the project as a “secret plan” like that? And if the guy was truly an enthusiastic member of the Arab Christian community, would it have been that hard to find likeminded people willing to openly participate in the film? Especially since he wasn’t exactly using top-flight actors to begin with.

This is the reason I thought it sounded like a propaganda film especially when I learned about his criminal background and his ties to terrorist networks and his forging of false identification on a professional level. It smacks of someone acting in a covert / operative capacity.

This film was never intended to be released for commercial purposes. No one would pay to see it.

It was made for propaganda purposes only. This is a "false flag" operation. A classic.

So, the question of who these guys are, and who they are working for is of utmost importance. Find out who they are working for and you will discover who is using this film.

Obviously AQ is behind this operation. But why is Obama still sticking to the "big lie" that this film had anything to do with the riots? Very strange, and somewhat damning.

There is, withhout a doubt, back-channel contact with the Muslim Brotherhood. William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, plus SEIU representatives, were in Cairo prior to the Arab Spring uprising -- schooling MB leadership in the use of social media to motivate and organize their rabble.

I watched those riots and remarked to my wife that those riots remarkably resemble a 1967 anti-vietnam protest right down to the flag/effigy burning and throwing back the gas canisters. Later, I read Code Pink was there and instruction booklets printed in english and kindergarten arabic were litter on the ground--"how to protest".

So, what do we have here? Clear evidence that elements of the same radical network that is running Obama are deeply involved with organizing "Arab Spring". And they are working in harness with the Muslim Brotherhood.

We can assume that they are not altruistically promoting democracy for its own sake. So, how does the Arab Spring and the Muslim Brotherhood fit into their particular agenda? What's in it for them...and their thrall, Obama?

For one thing, their actions appear designed to isolate Israel -- a target of their "foreign policy".

For another, I suspect there is a lot of Arab money involved in funding the network's activities. Certainly, the Soviet Union money that initially funded their operation in the Viet Nam days would've steadily dried-up and finally disappeared in 1989. There is some evidence that money started flowing from Saudi radicals as early as 1979. Accordingly, the Arab Spring operation may be a kind of payback.

I suspect they also view the MB as an ally in their ongoing efforts to subvert and eventually control the US of A. To which end, I wonder if the lamentable Innocence of Muslims trailer and the 9/11 embassy protests weren't the beginning of a plot to erode the First Amendment. The al-Qaeda attack and casualties in Libya, however, serving as an unexpected complication, derailing the whole operation.

I'd welcome what you can add to these ruminations -- What exactly does the radical network in Chicago expect to gain from Arab Spring and a relationship with the Muslim? Brotherhood?

The al-Qaeda attack and casualties in Libya, however, serving as an unexpected complication, derailing the whole operation.

Exactly. Obama can only speak as fast as Valerie Jarrett can think. That caught them completely off guard.

Your whole reply is spot on, but your last question What exactly does the radical network in Chicago expect to gain from Arab Spring and a relationship with the Muslim? Brotherhood?If I could answer that, then I could tell you why liberal socialists want to destroy America.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.