Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Live Under a Media Coup d’État
PJ Media ^ | 10/2/12 | Roger L Simon

Posted on 10/02/2012 6:02:47 AM PDT by Lakeshark

Coup d’états come in a variety of forms.

Some are violent with arrogant colonels pointing forty-fives at the temples of their predecessors and blowing their brains out; others are stealthy with the citizens awakening on an ordinary morning to find their whole world has changed yet not a drop of blood has been shed.

The latter is what has happened in America.

We are the victims of a media coup d’état and are currently living under it.

You will see that clearly in evidence on Wednesday night when the debates commence, each one moderated by a member of the liberal media nomenklatura. It is under the guidance of this liberalism, under their own version of sharia, if you will, that the debates will be conducted and Mitt Romney judged.
**snip**
This class, more than any, determined that Barack Obama should be president and they consequently will work more assiduously than any to assure his reelection, because a failure in that would be a serious, perhaps fatal, attack on their hegemony.

The coup would be in danger of a counter-coup. That can’t be allowed to happen. No facts, no events (Benghazi, Fast & Furious, endless unemployment, a healthcare fiasco) will get in the away or be allowed to be given serious credence.


**snip**
And the rest of us sat outside, tweeting, blogging, hoping Charles Krauthammer would say something smart on Fox News or Rush would get his revenge. But the narrative is set. The coup has taken hold. It’s too late now — or is it? We live in a Media State.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012electionbias; coup; dnctalkingpoints; mediacoup; msm; msmcoup; riggeddebates; riggedelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
It was Breitbart who said we wouldn't be able to ultimately win without retaking the culture in the media, in Hollywood, and the the Universities. IF we can take out the current Marxist stain, maybe they'll start to implode. Let's hope so, without taking these three down, we will remain in huge trouble. This article may be a bit Eeyorish in implying that it's too late. I prefer what Rush says: it's time to get more determined and take them out.
1 posted on 10/02/2012 6:02:53 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

American Pravda


2 posted on 10/02/2012 6:06:52 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

The d’état started with Nixon.


3 posted on 10/02/2012 6:08:12 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningfull to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

Actually, Truman.


4 posted on 10/02/2012 6:13:19 AM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

Correct.


5 posted on 10/02/2012 6:15:03 AM PDT by Obadiah (The corrupt MSM is the enemy of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl; Travis McGee
They MSM leaned lib from Roosevelt on, but until the Nixon take down, it hadn't become so obvious.

Now, it's just totally out of control. Starts in kindegarten, reinforced in J schools (heck, even in engineering schools), the entire Media onslaught plus Hollywood.

6 posted on 10/02/2012 6:15:53 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

They became really, really full of themselves after they claimed Nixon’s scalp. Can you imagine how they’re gonna be if they manage to drag Obozo across the finish line with his laughable joke of a record?


7 posted on 10/02/2012 6:19:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Thankfully we have conservative talkradio, Foxnews, and the internet to counterbalance.


8 posted on 10/02/2012 6:35:58 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

For it to be true that the media is truly in control of our destiny would require evidence that they have actually retained their once-powerful ability to persuade-that their credibility remains intact, in this day and time.

At least in recent times, there’s some evidence that the liberal media has little sway on elections.

The establishment media, the liberal education establishment and Hollywood shilled for each and every Democrat candidate in municipal, state, congressional, and gubernatorial elections in the run-up to the 2010 mid-terms. Did they really have an effect? The bottom line is that the electorate simply ignored them, went to the polls and handed the media-endorsed candidates a monumental defeat. Across the land. Is this not evidence that the vaunted media has perhaps lost its mojo?

The Wisconsin recall is another case in point.

Media credibility has perhaps not been lost, but clearly has been damaged. More importantly, we can now see that the lib media has come to care not a whit about credibility going forward. They are betting the farm on their relevance, and may lose that bet.

For many Americans there’s a feeling that they were sold a bill of goods in Barack Obama. Evidence? See above. With them, I believe the media is getting more and more of the blame. Nightly reports are being viewed now with a skepticism never before seen. More evidence? The massive switch of independent voters from Obama to Romney.

Polling firms have the same overwhelming need for relevance at the expense of credibility that the lib media do. To remain relevant, they must do the bidding of the liberal media.

If we continue to pay more heed to the seeds the media plants, instead of the crops they reap, then we will be in a constant state of demoralization.


9 posted on 10/02/2012 6:44:17 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright; Biggirl
I thought the article was a little on the eeyorish side, a bit too over the top.

It is true we have talk radio, plus they don't always win.

It is also true if it weren't for the MSM journolists I don't think Bambi would even get 40% of the vote. That's a lot of power.

10 posted on 10/02/2012 6:47:45 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I would say closer to 30% though and that is being very positive about it.


11 posted on 10/02/2012 6:50:44 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Be not fooled by the superficial impression that the eunuchs run the harem.


12 posted on 10/02/2012 6:53:54 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
"For it to be true that the media is truly in control of our destiny would require evidence that they have actually retained their once-powerful ability to persuade-that their credibility remains intact, in this day and time."

It's not necessary for them to persuade us.

They can influence us more by what they choose not to report - no persuasion necessary.

13 posted on 10/02/2012 6:56:18 AM PDT by eCSMaster (Indep. Payment Advisory Board = "Death Panels")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

14 posted on 10/02/2012 6:57:20 AM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Yep. When a President is ASKING companies to violate the law to enhance his re-election chances and the media doesn’t even think that is newsworthy they have become beneath contempt.


15 posted on 10/02/2012 6:57:25 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

16 posted on 10/02/2012 6:58:59 AM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: timestax

17 posted on 10/02/2012 7:01:43 AM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I think THAT is what Romney needs to do- ATTACK THE MEDIA WHORENALISTS posing as the debate moderators.

He can get a standing ovation out of the crowd, I bet


18 posted on 10/02/2012 7:01:43 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I often wonder if the Soviet-Era press was as gleefully willing as the current american media whorenalists

At least until they we TOLD what they had to write.


19 posted on 10/02/2012 7:04:32 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark


20 posted on 10/02/2012 7:08:14 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are the 53%, who pay taxes and keep this country going inspite of the 47% rat moochers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson