Posted on 10/05/2012 6:02:49 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Redefining marriage won't satisfy gay rights activists; they want to redefine reality.
Segregating genders in marriage to suit the sexual attractions of less than 2% of the population isn't enough. This woman with same-sex attraction wants scientists to "try harder" and give "priority" to making it possible for two women to procreate. Michelle Cheever says: "I want to have babies the way straight people do."
Huffington Post:
What I mean is that I want the ease, the convenience, the — dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family. I want both the simple beauty of two people loving each other so much that they'd like to see more of the other in the world, and I want that simple beauty to be translated into scientific terms of fairness: chromosomes and DNA given in equal amounts from two parents.
The attitude I have always taken to having a baby with another woman has been this: "It's not fair! It's so hard! Why me?"
I am a total brat about what I consider a biological injustice. . .
Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority.
Instead of urging scientists to "try harder," Cheever might as well demand that science try harder.
"Biological injustice"? What's next — are they going to sue their bodies for justice?
The problem with same-sex marriage is not that so-called anti-gay bigots oppose it. The challenge that gender segregationists face is their own biology, not hatred. SSM activists battle nature, not just culture. The problem is reality, not politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
Your children would be the epitomy of oldest high school taunt ever:
“Your children would always be known as butt hole babies”
Complete, utter self-centeredness - the antithesis of Judeo-Christian belief . . . yes, homosexuality IS an abomination in the eyes of God. . . but they can repent, just like the rest of us sinners.
Mental illness
“What I find particularly bizarre is that a person with low testosterone and high estrogen should be attracted to the reverse - a straight man or a lesbian woman - yet they end up with like people. If gay men like men, then why do they choose extremely effeminate partners? Similarly, why do lesbian couples usually look like a pair of hockey players?”
I agree. I guess it’s because probably the one they want(whether it’s a feminine woman or a masculine man) would never want them. So they have to settle for second(or third or last) choice instead. Which only adds to their psychological disorder and frustration.
A man will be a man and will always be a man... because of his genes..
No matter how much surgery or gender acting he does he will always be a man..
Because thats WHO HE IS.. and will be..
Anything other than that is just an “ACT”..
Like a monkey wearing a hat or smoking a cigarette..
He’s a dude, and a chick is a chick..
Anything else is pure Broadway.. a Dramatic mimic..
-OR- in some cases gender dysfuction in others just Sodomy..
Gays are always willing to answer polls about their sexual proclivities. Being a desperately small minority they know ADVERTISING WORKS, so they tell all. Used to be "the love that dare not say it's name" and now it's "the love that can't shut up".
Straight folks are different. 91% of them simply won't or don't participate in polls. They use their CALLER ID and their MISSED CALL information to avoid people they don't want to talk to, to say nothing of telling them about their sexual inclinations.
So, you got gays answering all the polls at a rate at a minimum of 10 times what straights do. That turns that 2% into .2% at most, and probably more like .1%
“Most things do to a nit-wit.”
Exactly. As a former research chemist at a large multinational chemical company, it never cease to amaze us that the managers in charge had no clue as to how thing were reacted and therefore, they thought it must be easy...
Take it up with God, honey. He's the one who decreed that humans would procreate the way they do. He's the one you have a problem with. Good luck.
Awesome! You found the script!
It was so absurd when I saw this the first time, but laughed over the years thinking how some liberals are almost like Stan, er, I mean Loretta.
Yet here we now are, with this news story.
Okeydokey - shoot to kill!!
“In other words, Miss Cheever would like a world where men never came into existence.”
Well, she can go f herself and keep on living in her current fantasyland...
“Like a monkey wearing a hat or smoking a cigarette..”
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Angry, tormented souls. All they want is to be like us, and they’re not, and never will be, and can’t get over it.
And I want to have wings and soar like an eagle.
Its just not fair that eagles can fly and I can’t.
Someday soon medical technology will make it possible for wealthy homos and lesbians to purchase human organs and body parts from poor people. They will have the parts surgically implanted to allow them to emulate the way regular people have sex, procreate, nurse babies, etc.
They will spend millions to buy the organs they need and to have themselves surgically altered to be almost the way normal people are mad by nature.
It will become a big business in countries where human life and body parts are for sale cheap and the money wealthy queers and lesbians are willing to spend is welcome.
"...Well I vana toilet made out of solid gold, but it's just not in the cards now is it?..."
The natural law will win in the end, no matter how delusional these people are and no matter how much they legislate and brainwash people to believe their contra-biological ideologies.
Biological reality is unfair. It would be hard to find a neurosis deeper than that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.