They used a breed of rats prone to breast cancer, and their statistical methods left much to be desired. The effect was not dose related, and one of the authors is a homeopath.
I too have had breast cancer, you want to eat that sh#t...feel free.
By the way all Californians who are still there... vote for GMO labelling please..
Prop 37.
The problem with a study like this is it is so bad it discredits any that come after that find a link. It poisons the well.
The study has been totally discredited, not by GMO advocates but by scientists. It is the kind of study that starts with a conclusion and then makes sure it finds it. Advocacy science is bad science.
I have a Masters in Chemistry.