Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Destroyed the Economy? The Case Against the Baby Boomers
The Atlantic ^ | 10/08/2012 | Jim Tankersley

Posted on 10/08/2012 8:11:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Retirees and near-retirees are leaving behind a devastated economy for their children ... but are we doing anything to fix it? Here, two generations debate who's really to blame for the wreckage.

*****

CRESCENT LAKE, Ore.--My father taught me how to throw a baseball and divide big numbers in my head and build a life where I'd be home in time to eat dinner with my kid most nights. He and my mother put me through college and urged me to follow my dreams. He never complained when I entered a field even less respected than his. He lives across the country and still calls just to check in and say he loves me.

His name is Tom. He is 63, tall and lean, a contracts lawyer in a small Oregon town. A few wisps of hair still reach across his scalp. The moustache I have never seen him without has faded from deep brown to silver. The puns he tormented my younger brother and me with throughout our childhood have evolved, improbably, into the funniest jokes my 6-year-old son has ever heard. I love my dad fiercely, even though he's beaten me in every argument we've ever had except two, and even though he is, statistically and generationally speaking, a parasite.

This is the charge I've leveled against him on a summer day in our Pacific Northwest vision of paradise. I have asked my favorite attorney to represent a very troublesome client, the entire baby-boom generation, in what should be a slam-dunk trial--for me. On behalf of future generations, I am accusing him and all the other parasites his age of breaking the sacred bargain that every American generation will pass a better country on to its children than the one it inherited.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; economy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: TruthWillWin

“The economy was destroyed by the Dems attempt to make home ownership an entitlement.”

The concept of home ownership for all dates back to the settlement of the colonies and frontier; there was land for all, and subsequent homesteading laws would transfer ownership to people who would settle and work land.

Without home ownership, you end up with too many people with no stake in an area/town/state; it is a noble goal, though it has been applied in bad ways.

As for blaming generations, I think if the boomers’ children preferred new babies over new cars we’d be in better shape; we are importing whole cultures to replace the “Americans” that will never be born.


21 posted on 10/08/2012 8:42:56 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
(eyeroll)

Boomers didn't give us the "Great Society." None of them could even vote for LBJ. Only the oldest boomers voted for Bobby Kennedy in 68 or McGovern in 72. It wasn't until the 82 midterms when all of the boomers could even vote.

Not every boomer was a hippie. Boomers gave us Reagan, and also Clinton. Some of them gave us Osama (although that's more split), but the older millennials (Younger ones haven't voted yet) are the most guilty of giving us that clown.

22 posted on 10/08/2012 8:44:04 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Holding my nose one more time to get rid of Eric Holder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I went to this guys Urban center website, and took a look at his info...

Based upon income data, most will take out more than they put in...

However, there is 1 category, what they call high wage ( couple making more than 75K ) that in 2020 retirement, will have paid in more than they will get out..

I fall into this category...

So, I am not a parasite, but I get to call the ones that say I am a parasite, a greedy leech that wants something for nothing, and willing to take away from the payers to give to the non payers...

Ha!!!!


23 posted on 10/08/2012 8:46:47 AM PDT by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is a deeper truth behind these charts.

What happened to the boomers? To varying degrees they were subjected to an educational system, purposely corrupted by Cultural Marxism. The political class was subjected to it much earlier than the rest.

There is no recognition of the hundreds of billions illegals cost NET each year.
There is no recognition of the $20,000 NET per each immigrant household who works at low wages cost each year.
There is no recognition of $~71,000 million blown annually on foreign aid to those who hate us regardless.
There is no recognition of $~25,000 million blown annually on the DOE.
There is no recognition of $~46,000 million blown annually on the HUD.
There is not mention of the $~10,000 million blown annually on the EPA.
There is no mention of the $900 Billion in easily identified medicare/medicaid fraud that IBM offered to fix for free. The offer was rejected more than once.
yada, yada, yada

Nor any recognition of the damage done to our economy and job opportunities by the so-called ‘Free Trade’ agreements that up to recently were somewhat hidden by enhanced government statistics and access to cheap credit.
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc_22_4/tsc_22_4_fletcher.shtml


24 posted on 10/08/2012 8:48:38 AM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sox; chargers fan
... the "Silent Generation" which sits between the Greatest and the Boomers. Folks born between 1925 and 1945 were the kids during WWII and the Great Depression, and their childhoods were greatly influenced by huge government. This generation was largely influential during the '60's, and most of the liberal radicals that are identified in these threads are from this generation. The "Silents" were the Beat generation, the folk singers, the Berkley campus radicals and the parents of the majority of the boomers.

Ding ding ding ding! We have a winner.

For more information read:


(click)

25 posted on 10/08/2012 8:49:21 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Romney vs Obama, Round One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyNxHOZiQPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

After reading the article, I have a strong desire to take a tire iron to both these pricks.


26 posted on 10/08/2012 8:50:22 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The author of this story is so full of crap on so many levals it’s unbelievable.There are many reasons the economy of this country has been destroyed and being a baby boomer has nothing to do with it.

I,a baby boomer have worked all of my life and have gotten ZIP from the Federal Government as have a large portion of the other FReepers here.

What destroyed this country is the uncontrolled immigration from the third world.People who can barely add one plus one together coming here and immediately requiring social services and creating huge families that required new schools to support them.

Then there’s all of the welfare going to these third world cess pools in the billions of dollars that we’re borrowing from the Chinese.

I could continue on and on but I’d be here all day.

The boomers had nothing to do with this disaster.Their Government did.Though the boomers will be the ones who will be paying for it in the end thanks to Obama.


27 posted on 10/08/2012 8:53:55 AM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri

bkmk


28 posted on 10/08/2012 9:01:41 AM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Let’s get ready to rumble ping....


29 posted on 10/08/2012 9:03:18 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (No tagline until JR gets the snail out of this site....as he promised moons ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

BTTT. You beat me to it.


30 posted on 10/08/2012 9:03:46 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The lies, spin, and errors of omission here are too numerous to point out and refute individually. But you don’t have to get very far into the column for the clues to emerge that the author is a Democrat “blame-America-first” scumbag who, mainly, thinks taxes should be (much) higher and that people who worked all their lives and dumped half their paychecks down the government toilet - - rather than the welfare bums, deadbeats, and parasites who comprise his party’s “base” - - are the “parasites”.

The author’s father is apparently a liberal Democrat scumbag, too, and he essentially agrees that yeah, his generation, the “baby boomers”, is a bunch of parasites but, hey, so was the previous generation, the so-called “greatest generation”.

You can bet the author is just another Democrat punk who pushes the false dichotomy that Americans are confused schizophrenics who want lots of government “services” but “don’t want to pay for them”. It’s a con job. A lie.

The people who demand all the “services” and “free” money from government are NOT the hard-working, traditional American families who pay all the taxes. And the hard-working, traditional American families who pay all the taxes are NOT the bums, deadbeats, and parasites who exchange their votes for “free” stuff from Democrat politicians. These are two separate and distinct groups of people. One group is the Republican “base” and the other is the Democrat “base”.


31 posted on 10/08/2012 9:04:27 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“The Greatest Generation was all for the too-good-to-be-true transfer of wealth that was the SS/Medicare Ponzi scheme.”

Social security is fully funded for the next twenty years or so. It has paid hundreds of billions in excess for the last twenty years, since Reagan raised the contributions to “save” the program. It is not a Ponzi scheme. Medicare is a problem because medical costs have risen far faster than anyone could reasonably have anticipated. Still, if you eliminated both programs, and the payroll taxes that fund them, the government would continue to run a massive deficit. The problem is not that SS/Medicare is a Ponzi scheme—it’s the the whole of government is a Ponzi scheme. We’ve been promised we can have what we want (most recently, two wars in the Middle East and free prescription drugs for seniors) without having to pay for them. And who keeps voting for the politicians that promise us that we can have more from the government and cut our taxes as well? We do. No one wants to do the math.


32 posted on 10/08/2012 9:09:28 AM PDT by juno67 (Gua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Who Destroyed the Economy? The Case Against the Baby Boomers

Purpose of article appears to be making the case for Generations X, Y, Z that Baby Boomers "owe" them and hence should pay for their health insurance till age 37.


33 posted on 10/08/2012 9:10:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Credit is just a concept. It people’s misuse of credit that is the problem.


34 posted on 10/08/2012 9:12:39 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lovely Alinsky tactics here. Divide and conquer works.


35 posted on 10/08/2012 9:14:40 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juno67

The biggest federal budget problem by far is Medicare, and SS is only fine for the next 20 years because it is handing out today donations that are supposed to be funding retirements 40 to 60 years into the future. That is exactly how a Ponzi scheme works.

Also, medical costs have risen so fast precisely because half of our system is socialized without even the watchdog capabilities of private sector third- or fourth-party payers.


36 posted on 10/08/2012 9:17:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

The money the Boomers paid in to SS over the past 40 years was used for their parents while the Boomers will probably see the money in SS run out in their own lifetime. At least we got something for the money we paid in and our parents were able to benefit from it.


37 posted on 10/08/2012 9:19:57 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Don't worry dear ..none of that will stop the under 40 crowd here from whining anyhow

freepers are so daft as a rule...God love them

do most even know the ages of the folks who really voted in the entitlements in the 1960s in Congress?

a fair amount were actually born in the very late 1800s or pre WWI and many were pre WWII generation...possibly a majority

there is blame to spread everywhere to be honest

what we have now are the first coming on line who actually have paid Medicare premiums their whole life and would-should-could get the benefit of that

one stat that the yutes here never like to self examine is that that under 35 kids today are markedly even more liberal than the same group in that detested hippie era

anyone can look up voting by age in 1972 and compare to 2008

that bodes even worse down the road

any generation tends to get more conservative with age overall..we can cross out fingers

38 posted on 10/08/2012 9:22:11 AM PDT by wardaddy (my wife prays in the tanning bed....guess what region i live in...ya'll?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who destroyed the economy. Stupid question. Simple answer: liberals.


39 posted on 10/08/2012 9:23:05 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Orwell in the throes of a demonic possession could not have come up with the "tuck rule".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
My parents, in their 80’s, have raked in many, many times what they put into Medicare. Now early Baby Boomers are doing the same.

I've seen this up close and personal with my parents and in-laws. I don't begrudge them, it's the system. But longevity has also added extra costs. My FIL immigrated here (legally) worked from the age of 50-65, while paying into SS and Medicare, retired at 65 and lived to be 93, all the while collecting SS and using Medicare (he was a pretty healthy guy, so his Medicare usage was minimal until the end.) The outpay compared to the inpay must have been huge. The system was/is broken.

40 posted on 10/08/2012 9:23:24 AM PDT by memyselfandi59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson