Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan unions fight to enshrine bargaining rights in constitution
The Washington TImes ^ | 10/8/2012 | Andrea Billups

Posted on 10/08/2012 7:10:12 PM PDT by markomalley

They have been playing defense elsewhere across the Midwest, but labor unions in Michigan have gone on the attack with a proposed first-in-the-nation amendment to the state constitution that would enshrine a right to collective bargaining for public — and private-sector workers — and invalidate any past or future laws to the contrary.

Proposal 2, backed by Michigan’s teachers and other public-employee unions, is being closely watched by labor and management groups across the country after a string of setbacks for the union movement in states such as Wisconsin and Indiana. Other states are likely to follow Michigan’s lead if voters approve the measure Nov. 6, analysts here say.

But Gov. Rick Snyder, who has a business background, generally has shunned the more confrontational approach toward labor adopted by fellow Republican governors such as Wisconsin’s Scott Walker. Much of the state’s business establishment also strongly opposes the measure, saying it will hurt competitiveness and take a big bite out of the state’s ability to control spending.

“It turns government unions into a superlegislature,” said F. Vincent Vernuccio, labor policy director of the pro-market Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, Mich., which calls the measure costly and overreaching. “If passed, it will give government unions an effective veto over legislation passed by elected representatives.”

(Excerpt) Read more at times247.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: michigan; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: SatinDoll
Truth hurts, doesn’t it. Maybe next time you should think before spouting communist talking points.

Collective bargaining is a matter of free association, once considered an unalienable right in this country. The real problem is not the existence of unions, it is union monopoly. If unions had to compete for business, they would behave far differently.

41 posted on 10/08/2012 11:08:20 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

My greatgrandfather was a union organizer for the International Workers of the World - the Wobblies. You don’t have to instruct me about unions and why they exist.

What I’m talking about is the proposition’s bullet #3: Override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.

This is blatantly anti-American, as it strips the voting public of law-making ability and elevates union power above those of the citizenry.


42 posted on 10/08/2012 11:38:52 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Thank you for the clarification of your post.

This is blatantly anti-American, as it strips the voting public of law-making ability and elevates union power above those of the citizenry.

Of course it is. I prefer to look toward real solutions to get people talking about them. It's long past time to revisit the NRLA.

43 posted on 10/09/2012 12:04:02 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Public employees should not be allowed to collectively negotiate wages and benefits.


44 posted on 10/09/2012 2:15:33 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“It’s long past time to revisit the NRLA.”

Agreed!


45 posted on 10/09/2012 2:26:43 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
Are unions legal in China?

Yes, but the law works differently in Communist China.

In Communist China, unions are legal, and often membership is required, but the "union" is not operated for the benefit of the union members, nor for the benefit of (and here's the real difference) the local, national and international Union Bosses. The union is operated for the benefit of the few highly placed members of the Communist Party inner circle.

These "Communists" are very rich elites that collect shakedown "partnership" profits from the people who actually built and run the factories (often foreigners).

The unions are operated to ensure smooth, high productivity operations at minimum cost for labor and benefits.

Unions in Communist China protect the state (which is one of the partners in the business that employs the workers), from the workers, and they do a very good job of it, as the workers in China generally perform highly productive, skilled work for very low wages, and very long hours.

Unions in the United States, and Communist China are highly similar in that they are both based on the same Marxist philosophy and Communist principles of organization and operation.

The important difference is that in China the elite don't allow the fat cat local and regional thug union bosses any riches or power, nor do they fund any international union activities anymore (why pay when ya don't have to and the useful idiots will keep on workin' for ya for free?).

In short, everybody in the union (including the bosses) gets screwed (and executed when necessary), for the benefit of the Communist insider elite who are oligarchs in reality, the 1% ultra rich (pretty much like the DemoRat elite in the US).

The important difference is the Commies have learned not to take too much from the factory owners (that would put them out of business and kill the golden goose), while the US DemoRat union thug bosses have not learned that lesson yet.

As far as your worry over collective bargaining rights, there are only two things you need to remember:

Required union membership=Communist tyranny

Required Right To Work, free from union intimidation=Free Market Liberty

Choose one.

My post was a sarcastic reference to US Communists (reference my tagline), not Chinese ones, however, Chinese Communists do operate within the law.

46 posted on 10/09/2012 2:28:11 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
This is blatantly anti-American, as it strips the voting public of law-making ability and elevates union power above those of the citizenry.

Exactly. Tyranny.

47 posted on 10/09/2012 2:44:26 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Good, let it pass. That’s federalism - the ability of each individual state to succeed or fail, thus providing a laboratory of proof of concept.

Imagine if all the liberal states had to stand on their own without the fedgov passing the same inane laws across the nation. They’d have to remain competitive. Federal overreach has covered their errors.

Here in IL our Gov. Pat Quinn’s solution to more than a half century of overspending is a federal bailout of our state. How’s that for thinking outside the box?


48 posted on 10/09/2012 3:20:35 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Public employees should not be allowed to collectively negotiate wages and benefits.

I agree and the police attempt to blackmail the city of Detroit is a perfect example of why. The Detroit Tigers are actually bringing money into the city and the police are in front of the park trying to scare people away.

And then there are other threats.

Cop Union Boss Boasts of Beating Lawmakers With Flashlights: If Soldiers Don’t Have Unions, Why Do Police and Teachers?

"We intend to walk into Lansing after the summer break and ask the Republicans who have been so eagerly screwing us, 'who's next?' If we cannot earn their respect we will do what we have always done; hit it with a flashlight until we gain compliance."
49 posted on 10/09/2012 4:53:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Yet they are selling it with claims that it will allow for firefighters to get equipment and will ensure that schools don’t hire child molesters.

The unions are sick, yet I fear they are fooling a lot of the populace. If this proposal passes, I will need to consider leaving this state.


50 posted on 10/09/2012 6:13:34 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Completely agree


51 posted on 10/09/2012 8:06:35 AM PDT by Crucial (Tolerance at the expense of equal treatment is the path to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gasshog
“It will never pass - After the SEIU goons held a “vote” to “unionize” home caregivers and started to grab dues from these people trying to take care of their families with State aid they fought back and won.”

Guess what? That is on the ballot again this time, and if it passes it be in the constitution and never go away.

52 posted on 10/09/2012 8:28:51 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

“Question: In Michigan, is a simple majority on a ballot enough to cause an amendment, or is a super-majority needed either by public or State Legislature vote?”

Simple majority! It is scary indeed.


53 posted on 10/09/2012 8:42:43 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958

If it passes in MI, and I fear that it will, then it will be brought to many more states. This is the first state in a long line of Dominos!


54 posted on 10/09/2012 8:44:38 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The truth is the union leadership knows the majority of people don’t want/need a union. They know that means a end to their six-figure salaries for doing nothing. They need to protect that.


55 posted on 10/09/2012 9:48:44 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I doubt it... or they could of done it ages ago.


56 posted on 10/09/2012 11:22:43 AM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Truth hurts, doesn’t it. Maybe next time you should think before spouting communist talking points.

Actually, I'm enjoying the discussion and the thoughtful points made by others. You should join in the discussion. I would think being alone in the school yard would be, well, lonely for you.

Let's start. I view the right to organize as a basic freedom and a conservative view. I don't look at the results of the process as cause to curtail rights. In my conservative mind, you find out where the process has broken down and fix it. I view the process as having broken down by the corrupt politicians that accepted campaign contributions and then compromised the best interest of the public.

Again, please, join the discussion. FR is about conservative friends discussing positions. I've taken a contrarian view, I realize that and I certainly dont' expect everyone to agree with it. It is just a little difficult to deal with "nan na nah na na na" as a rebuttal.

57 posted on 10/09/2012 3:23:50 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson