I'm looking forward to seeing how Professor Jim Hill and Dr. Barry Cox manage to integrate a faster-than-light particle into Einstein's theory (assuming they're able to do that, of course).
Here's another example to think about, namely knot theory and the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.
The above quoted from your link! I just loved the idea of mathematics as the "torch" that scientists use to light their way forward, the "active effectiveness" aspect.
An example of "passive effectiveness" might be Reimannian geometry a species of non-Euclidean geometry developed by Hermann Reimann in the nineteenth century without any particular practical application in view. But then later on, Einstein picked it up "off the shelf," as it were, and employed it in the development of his theories of relativity.
Also at your link is a link to another interesting article on the Fibonnaci series a numerical series that appears to be firmly embedded in the natural world; e.g., the branching points on stems, the "packing" plan of seeds on a sunflower seed head, et al.
Truly the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" is amazing!
Thank you so very much dearest sister in Christ for the link, for your deep interest in this subject, and for your kind words of support!