Posted on 10/10/2012 4:55:11 PM PDT by markomalley
Pressed at the White House press briefing to explain why the Obama administration initially connected the Libya terrorist attack to an anti-Islam video on YouTube, White House press secretary Jay Carney called the situation a “moving picture” and pointed fingers at the intelligence community.
“President Obama shortly after the attacks told ’60 Minutes’ that regarding [Mitt] Romney’s response to the attack, specifically in Egypt, the president said that Romney has a tendency to shoot first and aim later,” ABC’s Jake Tapper said to Carney on Wednesday at the White House about the attack that led to the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other staff members.
“Given the fact that so much was made out of the video that apparently had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on Benghazi, that there wasn’t even a protest outside the Benghazi post, didn’t President Obama shoot first and aim later?”
“First of all, Jake, I think your assessment about what we know now is not complete,” Carney responded.
“There is no question that in the region, including in Cairo, there were demonstrations reacting to the release of that video,” Carney said before Tapper interrupted and asked specifically about Benghazi.
“I will leave it to those who are testifying on the Hill to talk about,” Carney said.
“I’m not disputing that there was a protest. But what we said at the time is our intelligence community assessed that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. Okay? Again, this is a moving picture, and people who on the night of an attack or the day after claim they know all the facts without making clear that what we know is based on preliminary information aren’t being straight, and they’re in some cases trying to politicize a situation that should not be politicized.”
Carney said this was the point “the president was getting at” and “many other people felt the same way.”
“This president’s focus has been from day one on going after those who killed four Americans, on protecting the thousands of diplomatic personnel we have around the world and those facilities that they work in, and on making sure that a thorough investigation is conducted to find out what happened and look — that looks into our security posture both in Benghazi and elsewhere,” Carney added.
In his speech before the United Nations on Sept. 25, Obama mentioned the anti-Islam YouTube video.
“That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity,” Obama said.
“It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well — for as the city outside these walls makes clear, we are a country that has welcomed people of every race and religion. We are home to Muslims who worship across our country. We not only respect the freedom of religion — we have laws that protect individuals from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe. We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them.”
Carney also had no comment on the U.S. Embassy in Libya requesting more security on Sept. 11 but being denied.
“Lieutenant Colonel Wood and Eric Nordstrom, the former regional security officer, have both suggested that there were efforts from the U.S. embassy in Libya to have more security, and the State Department officials wouldn’t let it happen,” Tapper said to Carney.
“Why didn’t the State Department listen to these men on the ground in Libya who wanted there to be more security?”
Carney said, “There is no question that the result of what happened in Benghazi is not acceptable. Four Americans killed is not an acceptable situation, and that is why the president moved so quickly to ensure that an investigation was launched to bring the perpetrators to justice, the killers to justice, and a review was launched at the State Department to look at our security posture at the Bengali — I mean, not Bengali — at the Benghazi facility and elsewhere.”
Yea, but you gotta admit that it is low-hanging fruit - getting carney to compound one lie with another and doubling-down on stupid.
Moved quickly to Las Vegas that is.
Well essentially...he did.
Get him a freakin mirror.
Carney has been using this phrase a lot in the past month -"I'll leave it those at the __________ Department to talk about that."
I thought this was the most transparent administration in history? I thought Obama said the buck stopped with him?
Why is Carney always passing the buck downward whenever he's asked a question these days?
Somebody should make a montage of Carney's chronic buck-passing.
-PJ
Honestly, Carney is making Scott McClellan, Pres. Bush lame press secretary, look like Winston Churchill.
“There is no question that in the region, including in Cairo, there were demonstrations reacting to the release of that video,” near Cairo. A video discussed near Ciaro, which is near Benghazi. No there was was no protest in Benghazi, but in a round about way, Benghazi is near Benghazi, about two of y’all have a future in the main stream media, so who will it be? You all in the press corp are dumber than crap -you know what I mean. Do you want a free hat, T-shirt...?
I read that our PINO was back in bed within 90 minutes of getting the news.
The talking points were obviously in place about the Video — they (Barry,Rice & Clinton) were going to play that tune no matter what - the question is why?
My question to Jay:
“We’re getting reports that there is a substantially higher level of Russian concern about US support for Syrian rebels. And that those rebels contain members of the MB and AQ....is the Prez determined to get us into a World War with Russia, right before the election...?”
Wildcard Question:
“Did Ambassador Stevens job ever involve transfers of weapons from Libya to Syrian Rebels..?”
It's obvious Carney got some group coaching before the press conference. I imagine it went something like this: "Say it was a 'moving picture', Jay. Can't quite see what is going on until it stops. And it isn't stopping until after our boss gets re-elected. Use 'moving picture'. Yeah, that's the ticket!"
Just for starters, with a libs knowledge of firearms, they probably don’t think there is anything wrong with shooting before aiming. They’ve never seen a gun except in movies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.