Posted on 10/15/2012 1:24:04 PM PDT by matt04
Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren raised over $4 million more than Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown in the fundraising quarter that ended Sept. 30, according to numbers announced Monday by both campaigns.
Warren’s campaign said the Harvard Law School professor raised $12.1 million between July and September. Brown’s campaign said the sitting senator raised $7.45 million.
Throughout the campaign, Warren has consistently raised more money each quarter than Brown, in a race that is the most expensive Senate election in Massachusetts history and is on track to be the most expensive Senate race in the country this year. Counting the latest fundraising totals, Brown has raised $26 million so far this election cycle, while Warren has raised $36 million, based on their filings with the Federal Election Commission.
...
“Tens of thousands of people across Massachusetts have joined this campaign because they know that Elizabeth will fight for them in the U.S. Senate,” said Warren campaign finance director Michael Pratt in a statement. “While Scott Brown has stood with billionaires, big oil and Wall Street – and supports Republican control of the Senate – Elizabeth Warren has been there for middle class families and small businesses. This strong support will help propel the campaign to victory in November.”
(Excerpt) Read more at masslive.com ...
Based in the lawn sign ratio in the parts of Western MA I frequently travel in, Brown is winning.
She will be a full blown Communist DISASTER.
Pardon me for asking: Indian givers?
$16 Million of that cannot be traced.
Since she plans on not spending half of it, it won’t matter.
Granny Warren fought against women - Dow Chemical
Granny warren fought against Asbestos victims - Traveler’s
Granny Warren fought against Miners - LTV Steel
OK, I don’t like giving to RINOs, but Warren is SO bad, I’ll make an exception in this case and give some $ to Brown.
As an aside, I have noticed that the upscale communities have lots of Warren and 0bamao signs, wile lower middle class communities have more Brown and Romney signs.
I wonder why that is.
Soros
Right. Bought and paid for.
I hope she loses.
Must be all the Indian casino money.
I wonder if that includes all the beads.
Elizabeth Warren, candidate of the 1%.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/24/Does-Elizabeth-Warren-Have-a-Law-License-Problem
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/professors-bombshell-charge-elizabeth-warren-practiced-law-in-mass-without-a-license/
http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/24/report-warren-may-have-illegally-practiced-law-in-mass-without-license/
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem/
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/328356/elizabeth-warren-unlicensed-lawyer
Hard to get elected in Mass. without the UNIONS...
Ask Myth Romney.. <<- WARNING UN-PC comment..
Wonder how he would do as president?.. <<- Don’t ask..
He would NOT sign any legislation that SLAPPED the Unions..
[ I don’t see any unions backing him, so I’m thinking that he really won’t care. ]
Sooo.. you must SEE the unions backing him?... I see..
He utters not a syllable for or against the Unions..
Doesn’t even mention them.. or make implications.. nothing..
Crony-Unionism is a big part of Americas problems..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.