I don’t think so. Hillary is falling on her sword for Obama, whose policies were the root of the disaster and who did nothing about anything the whole day as it was unfolding. He left town and went to bed. He never even met with the NSC after the event. He has been negligent since the beginning (but of course, only after arming and empowering the jihadis).
Hillary has turned out to be surprisingly weak and absolutely cowers when she’s around Obama. People thought that the Clintons had something on Obama, but I suspect that Obama has something even worse on them, because Hillary has been an absolute doormat from day one.
That said, I don’t think anybody is going to believe that this is Hillary’s doing alone; she is clearly not responsible for setting policy (that’s done by Valerie Jarrett and some other random radicals, speaking through Obama) and the idea that she is now, weeks later, “taking responsibility” is positively laughable. Nice, Bambi, but no cigar.
Brilliant post!
Could Hillary be a 100 percent Marxist and know there is something bigger than her and Obama? She has gone right along with all this Muslim stuff the past 3 years. My point is this, possibly it is not so much about political preservation as it is pushing everything along as far as she can, so that the next big worldwide transition can take place.