Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen Graham, Ayotte and McCain release statement regarding Sec Clinton's statement
Facebook ^

Posted on 10/15/2012 7:33:27 PM PDT by Perdogg

just sent out this statement with Senator Kelly Ayotte and John McCain about the attack on our Consulate in Benghazi.

"We have just learned that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed full responsibility for any failure to secure our people and our Consulate in Benghazi prior to the attack of September 11, 2012. This is a laudable gesture, especially when the White House is trying to avoid any responsibility whatsoever.

"However, we must remember that the events of September 11 were preceded by an escalating pattern of attacks this year in Benghazi, including a bomb that was thrown into our Consulate in April, another explosive device that was detonated outside of our Consulate in June, and an assassination attempt on the British Ambassador. If the President was truly not aware of this rising threat level in Benghazi, then we have lost confidence in his national security team, whose responsibility it is to keep the President informed. But if the President was aware of these earlier attacks in Benghazi prior to the events of September 11, 2012, then he bears full responsibility for any security failures that occurred. The security of Americans serving our nation everywhere in the world is ultimately the job of the Commander-in-Chief. The buck stops there.

"Furthermore, there is the separate issue of the insistence by members of the Administration, including the President himself, that the attack in Benghazi was the result of a spontaneous demonstration triggered by a hateful video, long after it had become clear that the real cause was a terrorist attack. The President also bears responsibility for this portrayal of the attack, and we continue to believe that the American people deserve to know why the Administration acted as it did."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 112th; benghazi; benghaziattack; benghazicoverup; benghazigate; chrisstevens; christopherstevens; hillary; hillaryclinton; impeachnow; libya; obama; obamasfault; soshillary; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2012 7:33:29 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Obama is not going to get off the hook that easily.


2 posted on 10/15/2012 7:35:38 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Could you give us a source on this information?


3 posted on 10/15/2012 7:35:45 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (ZERO DARK THIRTY (coming soon to an embassy near you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Okay, but what do Meghan McCain, Jay-Z, Beyonce, Fiffy Cent and Ludicrous say about it? How ‘bout all the reality show people and American Idol contestants?


4 posted on 10/15/2012 7:37:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

facebook post it looks like.....


5 posted on 10/15/2012 7:37:44 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Link was provided.


6 posted on 10/15/2012 7:38:11 PM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/senators-insist-buck-must-stop-obama_654612.html


7 posted on 10/15/2012 7:42:16 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Graham’s Facebook page.


8 posted on 10/15/2012 7:43:13 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Holy dog shi# Batman! Mccain is making sense!!¡¡!!


9 posted on 10/15/2012 7:43:34 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I don’t belong to Facebook (I prefer not to), but after I closed the invitation, I found this post near the top of Lindsay Graham’s page.

My goodness. This must be the first time Lindsay Graham and Juan McCain have said something I’ve agreed with. Of course, they both supported the war against Kaddafi—the idiots—but at least they now seem to see some serious problems here with Obama’s conduct as Commander in Chief.


10 posted on 10/15/2012 7:43:47 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Senator John McCain Website:

http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=6759be04-0aad-51c7-c3fe-46c799fcd3e9&Region_id=&Issue_id=

STATEMENT BY SENATORS McCAIN, GRAHAM AND AYOTTE ON SECRETARY CLINTON’S COMMENTS THIS EVENING ON BENGHAZI ATTACK

October 15, 2012

Washington, D.C. ­– U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) today released the following statement on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s comments this evening regarding the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012:

“We have just learned that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed full responsibility for any failure to secure our people and our Consulate in Benghazi prior to the attack of September 11, 2012. This is a laudable gesture, especially when the White House is trying to avoid any responsibility whatsoever.

“However, we must remember that the events of September 11 were preceded by an escalating pattern of attacks this year in Benghazi, including a bomb that was thrown into our Consulate in April, another explosive device that was detonated outside of our Consulate in June, and an assassination attempt on the British Ambassador. If the President was truly not aware of this rising threat level in Benghazi, then we have lost confidence in his national security team, whose responsibility it is to keep the President informed. But if the President was aware of these earlier attacks in Benghazi prior to the events of September 11, 2012, then he bears full responsibility for any security failures that occurred. The security of Americans serving our nation everywhere in the world is ultimately the job of the Commander-in-Chief. The buck stops there.

“Furthermore, there is the separate issue of the insistence by members of the Administration, including the President himself, that the attack in Benghazi was the result of a spontaneous demonstration triggered by a hateful video, long after it had become clear that the real cause was a terrorist attack. The President also bears responsibility for this portrayal of the attack, and we continue to believe that the American people deserve to know why the Administration acted as it did.”

###


11 posted on 10/15/2012 7:43:53 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Good statement

The GOP has stepped it up tonight, Greta had Gingrich and Rudy on tonight voicing a very similar position as the McCain statement.

12 posted on 10/15/2012 7:45:57 PM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

“This is a laudable gesture, especially when the White House is trying to avoid any responsibility whatsoever.”

talking point


13 posted on 10/15/2012 7:46:40 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Well Senators Graham and McCain are generally useless with their pandering to the Washington establishment media and trying to be thought statesmanlike with their contrived shows of moderation, but here they seem to actually be taking the country’s interests to heart. (Sen. Ayotte’s record I do not know.)

(Of course, the cynic might suggest that like sharks they sense blood in the water and are going in for the kill on Obama and Sec. Clinton, but predators have their place in the natural world, so why not in the political world?)


14 posted on 10/15/2012 7:46:45 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Why isn’t Sweet Lindsey and McLame calling for Hillary to resign for the deaths of 4 Americans? Why is the GOP so afraid of Hillary? Do they know she still has copies of those FBI files?


15 posted on 10/15/2012 7:47:37 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

statement worded in a way that helps Clinton

why were those “elder statesman” the first to come out with the response

Billy Boy involved in some way?


16 posted on 10/15/2012 7:49:48 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Slam! Now Bambi must respond. Either he didn’t know about the
rising threats in Benghazi (missing daily PDBs will do that to you)
or he did, and failed to act. When was he notified about the attack,
did he call a NSC meeting, and who initiated the phony video narrative?


17 posted on 10/15/2012 7:51:54 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

OK, this may be way over the top but I think that this totally makes Obama look bad and Hillary and Bill know it makes him look bad and that’s why she took the fall. Very Machiavellian. I’m sort of loving it.


18 posted on 10/15/2012 7:52:11 PM PDT by Mercat (He was playing Words with Friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

” - - - if the President was aware of these earlier attacks in Benghazi prior to the events of September 11, 2012, then he bears full responsibility for any security failures that occurred. The security of Americans serving our nation everywhere in the world is ultimately the job of the Commander-in-Chief. The buck stops there. - - - “

What did Obama know, and when did he know it?


19 posted on 10/15/2012 7:52:52 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I agree that this is laughable.

Mr. Obama, you have th eblood of four men on your hands, and all you can do is lie.

You had best start talking, and you had best start right now, buddy.


20 posted on 10/15/2012 7:53:20 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yeah I noticed that too, RC.


21 posted on 10/15/2012 7:54:24 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Weak statement.

For starters, they should have declared Hillary Clintons claim not credible, that is not how reporting protocal works.

Next, they should call for her to imediatley resign. What is the value of falling on a sword if the dutiful soldier does not actually do it. If she feels she is really responsible, then she should resign at once and if she won’t, the president should call for her resignation immediately.

That will keep the issue in the news cycle at the same time it confronts the absurdity of Hillarys claim.


22 posted on 10/15/2012 7:56:21 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

There is also issue the issue of why nothing was done at all during and after the attack.

Live coverage and nothing was done. Why?

If there were an honest screw-up (yeah right) why not ACT?

Where were Obama and Clinton? Why did Obama go to sleep and Las Vegas fundraisers. Of course they were informed. Why did they do nothing?


23 posted on 10/15/2012 7:57:37 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

McMee and Graham?

I suspect coordination with Romney probably for
Open border legislation later. Sorry all but I don’t
Trust those two to do the right thing unless it serves
Them politically.


24 posted on 10/15/2012 7:58:56 PM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

All Hitlary said was she is the Secretary of State and she will find out who screwed up and made her look bad. The Hildabeast has not fallen on a sword nor been thrown under the bus. She simply gave the Ministry of Propaganda a nudge. Now they can move-on dot org that they are.


25 posted on 10/15/2012 8:00:30 PM PDT by Snuph ("give me Liberty...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

At DU they’re crying tears of adoration over this story. The recurring theme - “What a class act Hillary is!” One says, “Truth first, ambition later.” Truly a different universe.


26 posted on 10/15/2012 8:01:13 PM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Oh yes he is.

His kind always do, and we take it up the a$$.


27 posted on 10/15/2012 8:04:46 PM PDT by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

We WANT Hillary to look good, not Obama.

This is exactly as we predicted: modified limited Clintonian hang-out on the security; and retaliation from Clinton on the cover-up.

Set up well for Mitt tomorrow night.

Must remember: appearances notwithstanding, the Clintons want Obama defeated.


28 posted on 10/15/2012 8:10:15 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; Babsig; BILL_C; bnelson44; ColdOne; DesScorp; G.Love; ...
Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."


Want on or off this ping list?
Just FReepmail me.

Linda makes sense for once? Amazing!

29 posted on 10/15/2012 8:12:25 PM PDT by upchuck (Porn, cheaper than dating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
Correct. And hey must do it in a way that appears they're still on the team.
30 posted on 10/15/2012 8:14:34 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Joe Biden, giving new meaning to the term "Fantasy Football.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Very well said. Even a damned broken clock is correct two times a day!!!!


31 posted on 10/15/2012 8:15:52 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Donate, & walk precincts, not for "Parties", but for individual, principled "Candidates" (& for FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

And while we reluctantly accept Sec Clinton’s resignation we are still waiting for answers to why the President failed to protect American territory and citizens abroad.


32 posted on 10/15/2012 8:16:11 PM PDT by Billyv (Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Obama is in a damned if you do - damned if you don’t situation ...

There will [or should] be calls for him to fire or demand Hilary’s resignation. If he does, the Left will never forgive him - and it’ll cost him votes ...

If he doesn’t, he looks like he is hiding behind Hilary’s skirts, but refuses to fire the person responsible for the death of the Ambassador - it’ll cost him votes ...


33 posted on 10/15/2012 8:16:32 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Hard to know what evil machinations have been going on with Bubba. Perhaps this was the best way out. Maybe Dick Morris has not been told his talking point yet or he has been told to stay silent.


34 posted on 10/15/2012 8:21:39 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
EXTRA, EXTRA!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!!...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

35 posted on 10/15/2012 8:21:58 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat; RummyChick

Restores my faith in Hillary. I think she is getting the reaction she was hoping for. LOL

I think Obama should have been watching his back a little better.


36 posted on 10/15/2012 8:22:14 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
It's a nice turn of the knife by the Clintons, isn't it? They get credibility with the Party that dumped them for the Golden Boy in 2008, but unlike the morons in their Party and the collaborationist press, they know full well (because they ran the Executiuve Department) that the State Department isn't firewalled from the rest of the National Security apparatus. The request for security, the denial, and the deteriorating situation in Libya (as well as clandestine operations in which the Ambassador might well have been involved) would have come to the attention of the National Security Council. At which point the President would have known. Even if he didn't attend the briefing, he should have seen a brief, in all likelihood several.

It's a brilliant move. HRC makes a statement and stays out of the country. She won't be available for follow-ups until after the 2nd debate damage is done, maybe even the 3rd. Meanwhile, the latest spaghetti noodle of damage control flops harmlessly from the wall, leaving Zero to twist slowly in the wind.

37 posted on 10/15/2012 8:22:58 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Joe Biden, giving new meaning to the term "Fantasy Football.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The libs keep saying that there’s nothing that could have been done, that they had no way way of knowing that an attack was coming.

But the facts are clear- there were two previous attacks on the Benghazi site. There were requests for more security. We were involved in trying to remove weapons from the bad guys there, and they were highly motivated to stop it.

It’s possible that the primary target of the attack wasn’t even the ambassador, but the weapons and intelligence specialists, and the classified information that was in the building- that the US didn’t even try to get. CNN was in the building before we were!

It’s one thing to say you’re taking responsibility, but until those words are backed up with action, the words are hollow. Clinton needs to resign now.


38 posted on 10/15/2012 8:25:20 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

“we continue to believe that the American people deserve to know why the Administration acted as it did”

The democrat chair during an interview on Fox News scoffed and said “the American People don’t want an answer.”


39 posted on 10/15/2012 8:32:31 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia ("Together we will unite America and get this done" - Paul Ryan - August 11, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
This is a laudable gesture, especially when the White House is trying to avoid any responsibility whatsoever.

What BS. Over a month after the attack, Clinton now claims responsibility. Why didn't she attend the Congressional hearings? Why did she cite the video at Andrews AFB?

This crapola has to do with the fact that Obama debates Romney tomorrow night. And if claiming responsibility is so laudable, why hasn't she submitted her resignation?

40 posted on 10/15/2012 8:38:01 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Wrote this in another thread...

In one of the debates Romney needs to ask these questons:

Who told Susan Rice to say what she said?

Who within the intelligence community told YOU that there was a demonstration caused by the video?

Where did they get THEIR information?

Did you, Mr. President, ask them where they got THEIR information?

Why did you and your surrogates represent to the American people with certainty that their were spontaneous demonstrations resulting from the video that contributed to the Benghazi murders when no such evidence actually existed?

If necessary talk about transparency and the need to know the answers to these questions in order to prevent a reoccurence.

If Obama doesn’t answer these questions, then ASK THEM AT LEAST TWICE MORE so that people understand that Obama is refusing to give a straight answer to a straight question.

If he asks these questions he won’t need to label the President a liar - his inability to answer them will plainly demonstrate his intentional deception.


41 posted on 10/15/2012 8:39:59 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If the President was truly not aware of this rising threat level in Benghazi, then we have lost confidence in his national security team, whose responsibility it is to keep the President informed.

No. It is the responsibility of the CiC to attend security briefings. He is the President. You can't blame the national security team if the President won't participate in the briefings

42 posted on 10/15/2012 8:43:10 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR
The State Department was in real time communication with the Consulate during the attack. They also spoke to the 25 or so people assigned there that survived the attack. It was known just two days after the attack from a local guard who was wounded during the attack that "not even an ant was moving" outside the compound before the attack.

Obama and Rice have been lying.

43 posted on 10/15/2012 8:51:10 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Good solid statement. Lays out the facts, without any hyperbole.

Balls in your court, Obama.

44 posted on 10/15/2012 8:54:06 PM PDT by dead (It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Fiffy” Cent

Bwaahahahaaaa. Fiffy.

I think it is something like “fiddy cent”, but I much prefer “Fiffy”.


45 posted on 10/15/2012 8:59:03 PM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“The State Department was in real time communication with the Consulate during the attack. They also spoke to the 25 or so people assigned there that survived the attack. It was known just two days after the attack from a local guard who was wounded during the attack that “not even an ant was moving” outside the compound before the attack.

Obama and Rice have been lying.”

Exactly, and that is why I would like to see Romney take the time during one of the debates to ask the questions I posed so he can nail Obama and expose him for the liar he is.


46 posted on 10/15/2012 8:59:03 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment
The libs keep saying that there’s nothing that could have been done, that they had no way way of knowing that an attack was coming.

The attack exceeded all expectation, yet this administration will be found woefully incompetent at reasonably mitigating the threat. Missing the intelligence briefings did not help. Cozying up to the enemy did not help. Blaming it on a video did not help. Inserting both thumbs in butt while mission burned did not help. One way or another, we WILL find out whether it was incompetence, or something more nefarious.

But whatever falsehoods spew forth from those responsible, rest assured the MSM will ignore it, and your typical liberals will label them as mere "inaccuracies."

47 posted on 10/15/2012 9:08:45 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (ABO to the core.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
Obama is in a damned if you do - damned if you don’t situation ...

Of course he is...to NORMAL Americans. But with the compliant media at his beck and call, it will be turned into a "Republicans making a bad situation into a political one all in an attempt to get Obama three weeks before the election" scenario. They will switch the blame to Romney as they did at the start for "trying to score points" over a terrorist action where Americans were killed.

It really shouldn't matter when something like this happens so much as why it happened. No doubt they will string us along for as long as they can, spinning it every which way but loose, until AFTER the election is over. And if Obama wins, it will not matter and will be swept under the rug. If Romney wins, then it will be thrown in his face that he won "unfairly" by smearing poor Obama over something HILLARY did. How I wish we could replace what calls itself "professional" journalism at the same time!

48 posted on 10/15/2012 9:08:51 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: deport
The buck stops there.

I think Hillary did a brilliant move with that statement. While appearing to try to take the blame from Obama, she instead pointed out that the buck stops at the president's desk, ala Truman, and that a real President takes responsibility. I see Willy's hand in this.
49 posted on 10/15/2012 9:24:03 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JIM O

The town hall debate today probably won’t deal as much with Benghazi as I would appreciate, but that is OK as it turns out.

The Foreign Policy debate in nine days is when Romney as well as the rest of the GOP really need to put the screws to Zero’s administration about it. The way the information mill is working, the subject is going to be pretty mature by then, and people will be listening.

I am more convinced that it may have something to do with the weapons given to the AlQ working with the “rebels”. If that proves to be true, we’re talking about the “Mother of All Gun Walking”.

Do people really want to re-elect someone who is suffering a scandal worse than Watergate? Do they want to see another two+ year period with that kind of troublesome drama in DC? I think not, and believe that some number of people will change their vote from -bama to Romney for the sole reason of avoiding that.


50 posted on 10/15/2012 9:33:54 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson