Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Companies Are Evil, So It's OK to Lie about Them
Townhall.com ^ | October 16, 2012 | Mona Charen

Posted on 10/16/2012 5:19:17 AM PDT by Kaslin

President Obama presented himself to the nation in 2008 as something new -- a change agent who would bring fresh ideas to our national challenges and solve problems in a post-partisan, unifying fashion.

In fact, as some noted at the time, his ideas were decrepit hand-me-downs, about as novel as disco or the leisure suit. He is a conventional, left-wing statist, George McGovern with a bigger smile, eager to bring ever-larger segments of American life under tight government control and direction. As for unity, his presidency has set new records for contemning the opposition -- a disdain histrionically pantomimed by Joe Biden.

Obama's deep hostility to the private sector has been evident throughout his presidency and popped up like verbal ticks during the first debate. He warned against putting seniors "like my grandmother at the mercy of the private insurance system." Those companies, he added knowingly, "are pretty clever about figuring out who are the younger and healthier seniors." He trotted out his old warhorse about companies "getting tax breaks for shipping jobs overseas," and he claimed that Obamacare protects people from "being jerked around" by insurance companies.

So hostile is the president to insurance companies that he stooped to misrepresenting the facts of his mother's illness and death the better to paint them as malevolent. In a 2008 debate with John McCain, Obama said this: "For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they're saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don't have to pay her treatment, there's something fundamentally wrong about that."

As Janny Scott, a former New York Times reporter, revealed in her biography of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, it didn't happen. Mrs. Obama's medical expenses were paid for by CIGNA. There was a dispute with the company over disability insurance, but the company never attempted to deny coverage for her cancer treatment. When the White House was questioned about the Scott account, a spokesman did not dispute it, saying that it was all a very long time ago.

Obamacare was designed by people who believe passionately that private companies must be strictly controlled and regulated by Washington bureaucrats, who will run things far more humanely and even more efficiently. Mr. Obama cited the bogus statistic that Medicare has "lower administrative costs" than the private sector. This is specious. Medicare's administrative costs are spread over several different agencies. The IRS collects the taxes that fund the program, the Social Security Administration collects some of the premiums paid by beneficiaries, and the Department of Health and Human Services handles accounting, auditing, fraud and other issues.

Additionally, Medicare's population is older and sicker than the typical insurance pool. Their medical costs are accordingly higher, so as a percentage of total spending on the patient, Medicare's per patient administrative costs will be smaller. But that isn't because Medicare is more efficient.

This is not to say that insurance companies are virtuous. They are simply businesses, doing what makes sense for their customers and shareholders. It would never occur to Barack Obama that the best way to go after insurance companies whose behavior you dislike is to provide competitors. No, his plan, now just beginning to sting, is to create 159 new bureaus and agencies, and 11,327 pages of new regulations (so far).

Any first-year economics student could have predicted what happened last week in response to one feature of the law. Obamacare requires that companies with 50 or more full-time employees provide health insurance or pay a fine. A restaurant chain that includes Olive Garden and Red Lobster (not one of the 1200 well-connected companies and unions who've received waivers) announced that it will be placing more of its 180,000 employees on part-time status -- thereby diminishing the salaries of thousands of people.

The Obama Administration will perhaps regard this utterly predictable response (and this is just the beginning) as "jerking people around," and may, if reelected, issue regulations making it illegal to change an employee's status from full-time to part-time. That's how statists operate. Try firing someone in France -- which is why jobs are so scarce in France.

And so it will go, with the federal government chasing after private industry with more and more restrictions and penalties -- never seeing that they are circling the drain.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; barackobama; bhofascism; business; corporatetaxes; democrats; medicare; obama

1 posted on 10/16/2012 5:19:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bump


2 posted on 10/16/2012 5:28:37 AM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It has always worked for Hollywood.


3 posted on 10/16/2012 5:59:55 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He is worse than George McGovern.

McGovern was just a stupid lefty who believed in big government.

Obama is a stupid lefty who WANTS TO destroy the US economy

Even McGovern (once he retired from politics and started a bed&breakfast) said “If I knew then what I know now [about running a business and govt regulations], I would not have been what I was”. Which is another stupid statement from him that essentially measn “I was wrong” but he is too stupid to publicly state it and work to reverse the damage others like him are causing.

Democraps are people who are TOO STUPID to “get it” until it is way too late. We all know someone like that- someone who always thinks they know better until some disaster happens that they themselves caused and they learn their lesson.


4 posted on 10/16/2012 6:12:24 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obamacare requires that companies with 50 or more full-time employees provide health insurance or pay a fine.

How do you define a "full-time employee"? Pretty simple, huh? Anybody working over 30 hours per week.

Nope. In September, the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services released their definition of a full-time employee. It is 18 pages long. Plus, I'm sure each company will have to file Form X34y&-Rel4 in quadruplicate to PROVE each declared full-time employ is actually indeed a full-time employee per IRS/DHS regulations.

Government is the biggest waste of human resources ever conceived and is our downfall.

5 posted on 10/16/2012 6:50:37 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They sure love doling out heaps of money to the companies they like though.


6 posted on 10/16/2012 6:56:31 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

If you own a business, bust it up into smaller units.


7 posted on 10/16/2012 7:03:31 AM PDT by steve8714 (Code pink vaginas shown actual size)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

***McGovern was just a stupid lefty who believed in big government.

Obama is a stupid lefty who WANTS TO destroy the US economy****

McGovern voters were told they would receive $1000.00 if McGovern was elected.

Obama supporters sold their votes for a cheap cell phone.


8 posted on 10/16/2012 7:15:53 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Interesting.

I know of companies with more than 50 employees who are scaling back hours to 32. Then they tell their employees that they are welcome to sign up for 8 to 10 overtime hours if they like. The employess realize that they are actually full time but cannot be called full time if the companies are to survive.


9 posted on 10/16/2012 7:22:05 AM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I always thought someone working 40 hours per week is considered a full time employee


10 posted on 10/16/2012 9:57:10 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That’s what I thought, too. I’ve always nominally worked 8 x 5 (in reality more like 50 - 60 per week). But most companies I know provide full benefits to those working 30 or more hours per week and classify them as full time.


11 posted on 10/17/2012 3:25:15 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson