Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 9/14/2012
The White House ^ | September 14, 2012 | Jay Carney, White House Press Secretary

Posted on 10/17/2012 8:20:40 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

MR. CARNEY: Jake, let’s be clear, these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region --

Q: At Benghazi? What happened at Benghazi --

MR. CARNEY: We certainly don't know. We don't know otherwise. We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive. And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy.

Q: But the group around the Benghazi post was well armed. It was a well-coordinated attack. Do you think it was a spontaneous protest against a movie?

MR. CARNEY: Look, this is obviously under investigation, and I don’t have –

Q: But your operating assumption is that that was in response to the video, in Benghazi? I just want to clear that up. That’s the framework? That’s the operating assumption?

MR. CARNEY: Look, it’s not an assumption --

Q: Because there are administration officials who don’t -- who dispute that, who say that it looks like this was something other than a protest.

MR. CARNEY: I think there has been news reports on this, Jake, even in the press, which some of it has been speculative. What I’m telling you is this is under investigation. The unrest around the region has been in response to this video...Jake, again, what we have seen is unrest around the region in response to a video that Muslims find offensive, many Muslims find offensive. We have seen incidents like this in the past, in reaction to other actions -- cartoons and other actions that have been taken, that have been -- have led to protests and violence in the region. And we have managed those situations, and we are working to ensure that our diplomatic personnel and our diplomatic facilities are secure as we deal with the response to this video, which we believe is offensive and disgusting...The cause of the unrest was a video, and that continues today, as you know, as we anticipated. And it may continue for some time. We are working with governments around the region to remind them of their responsibilities to provide security to diplomatic personnel and facilities, and we are ensuring that more resources are put in place to protect our embassies and consulates and our personnel in these parts of the world where unrest is occurring.

Q: You’ve mentioned a number of times now that this was in response to a video or a film. Would you not agree, though, that it’s moved beyond that? That some are stirring violence by focusing on U.S. policy, or targeting the U.S. in general? That it’s no longer just about the film?

MR. CARNEY: Well, the reason why there is unrest is because of the film; this is in response to the film. I don’t doubt --

Q: Well, that’s what sparked it. You think that’s what sparked it.

MR. CARNEY: We do think that’s what sparked it.

Q: Right. But it’s moved beyond that, hasn’t it?

MR. CARNEY: Well, I don’t -- we obviously are not polling protesters to find out what their motivations are. There is no question that there’s anti-American sentiment in various countries around the Middle East; that’s not a discovery I think we’ve made today. What is the case is that the protesters in these countries are not representative of the broader sentiment in those countries, at least in the sense that -- sentiment that would say that the reaction, the proper reaction to a film that is offensive is violence. As I said yesterday, that’s not in keeping with Islam, and it’s certainly something that we do not accept. And we have made clear to leaders in the region that they need to make clear that it is not an acceptable reaction to a film, however offensive it might be.

Again, this is not a film that the United States government had anything to do with. We reject its message and its contents. We find it both disgusting and reprehensible. America has a history of religious tolerance and respect for religious beliefs, and that history goes back to our nation’s founding. But there is absolutely -- as I’ve said, absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence, and we are making -- we are working, rather, to make sure that Muslims around the globe hear that message.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: actsofterror; carneylies; libya; lies; obamalies; presidentialdebate2
This is an excerpt.
1 posted on 10/17/2012 8:20:46 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I just read that Hillary watched the attack in real time. They know exactly what happened. The lies are not able to be erased. They were deliberate and real.

I have to believe that they started the story to COVER UP the "non success" of assassinating Kahadaffi in favor of this group of murderous Muslims.

Kaddahfi warned us that the "bad Muslims" were causing the problems.

Kaddahfi had it right.

2 posted on 10/17/2012 8:35:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Carny and BO

Obama: The video, stay focused on the video.

3 posted on 10/17/2012 8:38:59 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Carney is a communist liar parrot for Obama..
4 posted on 10/17/2012 8:38:59 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Whoa. The way he parses and obviously infers that Benghazi was due to the film, but always adds “under investigation” shows that this is a VERY DELIBERATE LIE and he has been told to be very careful.

He doesn’t say “yes, we believe this attack was due to the film” but he uses the English language strongly to OBFUSCATE. So even he must have been told that it was a pre planned terrorist attack, but it is important to get the media and American people to blame it all on the video.

And he lied outright in saying that it was not due to 9/11.

5 posted on 10/17/2012 8:39:58 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


6 posted on 10/17/2012 8:49:38 AM PDT by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Obama wanted to convey he called Benghazi a terror attack in the Rose Garden on 9-12-12. ...had Crowley defend him.

So Mr. President, why didn't you tell anyone in your administration?

7 posted on 10/17/2012 9:47:09 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson