Posted on 10/18/2012 5:51:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Candy Crowley, the moderator of the presidential debate at Hofstra University on October 16, interfered in this U.S. presidential race in a way no one ever has before and—let’s hope—no one ever will again. Crowley loudly validated President Barack Obama’s version of reality—and contradicted Governor Mitt Romney’s recollection of actual reality—regarding what the president said in the Rose Garden about what happened in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2011.
During the debate President Obama said he called the murder of four Americans an act of terrorism. Romney said he didn’t. Crowley said he did. And Crowley told them they had to move along.
And then the debate did, in fact, move on. And the one opportunity during this debate that voters had to understand what Obama knew, when did he know it, and what did he call it, was lost. …
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishpress.com ...
Gee, I wonder why CNN’s ratings have fallen off the map. /sarc
What about this? Is this related to Murdoch's trial?
What about this? Is this related to Murdoch's trial?
I don’t think the phone hacking thing is related.
” - - - Crowley loudly validated President Barack Obama’s version of reality – and contradicted Governor Mitt Romney’s recollection of actual reality - - - “
Candy Crowley, proud member of CLAM, Censoring Liberal Agenda Media.
Crowley proves that NO member of ANY Media should ever be a Moderator again.
Get a History Professor to be the Moderator, or have no Moderator at all.
Could you please remove the redundant post?
How many history professors are themselves not left-leaning and into “revisionism” though . . . ?
Well, you’ve got admit, hiding behind either one gives damned good cover. Him and his bus.
She did Bobo no favors, as her Benghazi bias ate up the next morning’s news cycle...
Fair point.
How about Professor Larry Sabato at NC, and appears on Fox from time to time as a political expert?
No, not at all. I was just clarifying that my comment was aimed at the popular notion and not your comment in particular.
Perhaps an economic expert for debates on economic policy and so forth. I'm drawing a blank on names myself.
And it will, without a doubt, be by the grace of Almighty God, who took great pity upon our wayward, undeserving souls.
With all the blow back from Crowley’s behavior, I think it helps Romney much more than if she kept her mouth shut.
Did you notice how fast Crowley changed the subject when Romney brought up Fast and Furious???
I found Crowley very annoying, no doubt or argument there.
But Mitt+CO agreed to these debates because they thought they needed them. If they felt they had the upper hand they would have demanded a Britt Hume, or at least Brett Baur. Now that would have been fun.
Not surprisingly yesterday a number over at the Dem channel were making fun of R whining about this debate, some the same ones who whined about the first debate. They concluded that this is an admission that Mittlost. Duhhh!
LOL - good one katana...
Lou Dobbs, John Stossel, Mary Katharine Ham or Dr. Krauthammer (a registered Democrat, after all)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.