Posted on 10/20/2012 3:44:12 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
“I guess the bad news is that McCain cares.”
George McGovern might also care, and Edmund Musky and John Kerry. A bunch of failed presidential candidates care, and that scares off all the other people that somebody might listen to.
I doubt the Zionists could dream a scenario up this good, but so long as it’s happening, why not stir the pot to keep it happening.
At some point turning it into a war where Moslems kill only Moslems might be a good idea, but that stuff spills over as well.
So far American involvement has simply ignored the existence of Christian communities in Syria.
The Sumerians are referenced at least once ~ i believe their last king made it, but there’s a lot of history before that. Adam was probably still off in the highlands of Chile at the time.
Sorry to wake you from your nap!
Sumer is just another mame for chalde, which is what Abraham was. They were the descendents of Shem at that time, which was two generations before the first Hebrew (or Hibiru, as they were first known) who was of course Jacob.
Abraham showed up quite some time after Semites (Akkadian) moved into the area and absorbed the Sumerians.
I'm of the school who thinks the kindly priests and scribes who pieced together the earliest revelations and histories failed to find the Sumerian archives ~ so they missed several thousand generations between Adam and Abraham.
The petroglyphs in the Kola have a story that's clearly that of Lot's wife ~ the stones are dated to 8000 years ~ BTW, it's all about a woman who failed in her duty to find husbands for her daughters.
The Biblically illiterate make many foolish statements.
Of the generations between Adam and Abraham, only Noah’s matters. All were killed but those aboard the ark.
Don’t worry about the dating schemes, they were run back from the desired outcome, thus are without meaning.
nobody to win is the best option yes. a continuous self-inflicted turmoil among moslems is the best options. We should covertly help whichever side is losing and turn against a side when it gets too strong.
exactly, just as in Iraq.
Chaldea was the new name given by the Semitic peoples who came to Sumer. Actually even the name Sumer is a later adaption. The original peoples were probably Dravidian and called themselves Sa-gi-ga or the “black headed people”. These were the peoples who stayed where the tower of Babel (most likely the ziggurat in Uruk) was built.
Exactly. A crate of arms is a crate of arms. No need to put travel decals on it.
Cronos, there weren’t enough generations between Noah and Abraham for any great development in Chaldea.
I suspect that you’re accepting some anti-biblical chaff to enter as ‘evidence.’
>> “We should covertly help whichever side is losing and turn against a side when it gets too strong.” <<
.
Or we should just step aside and watch the Lord’s plan prevail.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
The Sumerian developments happened in those pre-Abrahamic times. Who says development can’t be ultra quick? see the 90s here
The Lord’s plan may be for us to keep both fighting. Remember the story of the man on a roof in a flooded area? First two boats and then a helicoptor comes and he refuses it and when he drowns and goes to God to ask why, God says “I sent you two boats and a helicopter...”
The story of the man on the roof is far from biblical.
The life of Elijah would be a far better example.
Note: this topic is from 10/20/2012. A re-ping. Thanks Eleutheria5.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.